Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T00:37:49.587Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Howard Jarvis, Populist Entrepreneur: Reevaluating the Causes of Proposition 13

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 January 2016

Extract

During the months immediately preceding California’s June 1978 primary election, Proposition 13, the fractious property tax ballot measure, received a dizzying amount of media attention. Newspaper columnists from California and around the country swapped partisan barbs, debating ad infinitum the initiative’s merits and faults. In public forums, political scientists and economists calculated and recalculated the measure’s possible effects and unintended consequences. Heated letters to the editor and sharp-edged political cartoons saturated the editorial pages of local newspapers. Opinion polls registered the public’s sentiment toward the measure on a weekly basis. Shrill advertisements touting either the necessity or the destructiveness of the proposition interrupted regularly scheduled television and radio programs. Indefatigable Howard Jarvis, the monomaniacal, septuagenarian leader of the tax limitation movement, was seemingly everywhere. By election day, the proponents and opponents of Prop 13 had spent over $2 million each on the measure (CFPPC 1988).

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Social Science History Association 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, James Ring (1984) Secrets of the Tax Revolt. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovano-vich.Google Scholar
Anderson, Jack (1978) “Jarvis is a veteran of political ‘stings.’Washington Post, 27 July.Google Scholar
“Behr’s tax-relief bill passes Assembly test” (1978) Long Beach Independent, 18 February.Google Scholar
Brody, Richard (1979) “Who voted for Proposition 13?Taxing and Spending 2 (February): 2628.Google Scholar
Bush, Ed (1978) “Howard Jarvis.” Personality (December): 413.Google Scholar
California Commission on Campaign Financing (1992) Democracy by Initiative: Shaping California’s Fourth Branch of Government. Los Angeles: Center for Responsive Government.Google Scholar
California Fair Political Practices Commission (CFPPC) (1976a) “Committee Campaign Statement, United Organizations of Taxpayers.” Sacramento, 22 June.Google Scholar
California Fair Political Practices Commission (CFPPC) (1976b) “Committee Campaign Statement, United Organizations of Taxpayers.” Sacramento, 22 July.Google Scholar
California Fair Political Practices Commission (CFPPC) (1977a) “Committee Campaign Statement, United Organizations of Taxpayers.” Sacramento, 7 March.Google Scholar
California Fair Political Practices Commission (CFPPC) (1977b) “Committee Campaign Statement, United Organizations of Taxpayers.” Sacramento, 30 December.Google Scholar
California Fair Political Practices Commission (CFPPC) (1978a) “Campaign Contribution and Spending Report.” Sacramento, 28 September.Google Scholar
California Fair Political Practices Commission (CFPPC) (1978b) “Committee Campaign Statement, United Organizations of Taxpayers.” Sacramento, 30 June.Google Scholar
California Fair Political Practices Commission (CFPPC) (1978c) “Committee Campaign Statement, Yes on 13 Committee.” Sacramento, 23 April.Google Scholar
California Fair Political Practices Commission (CFPPC) (1978d) “Committee Campaign Statement, Yes on 13 Committee.” Sacramento, 25 May.Google Scholar
California Fair Political Practices Commission (CFPPC) (1978e) “Committee Campaign Statement, Yes on 13 Committee.” Sacramento, 30 June.Google Scholar
California Fair Political Practices Commission (CFPPC) (1978f) “Committee Campaign Statement, Yes on 13 Committee.” Sacramento, 31 December.Google Scholar
California Fair Political Practices Commission (CFPPC) (1988) “Historical overview of receipts and expenditures by ballot measure committees.” Sacramento, April.Google Scholar
California Franchise Tax Board (CFTB) (1978) “Audit Report, Yes on 13 Committee.” Sacramento, 11 September.Google Scholar
California Fair Political Practices Commission (CFPPC) (1980) “Audit Report, Yes on 13 Committee.” Sacramento, 5 February.Google Scholar
Canovan, Margaret (1981) Populism. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Carroll, Jerry (1980) “The return of Howard Jarvis.” New West, 5 May, 5966.Google Scholar
Citrin, Jack (1984) “The legacy of Proposition 13,” in Schwadron, Terry (ed.) California and the American Tax Revolt. Berkeley: University of California Press: 169.Google Scholar
Citrin, Jack (1996) “Who’s the boss?: Direct democracy and popular control,” in Craig, Stephen (ed.) Broken Contract: Changing Relationships between Americans and Their Government. Boulder, CO: Westview Press: 26893.Google Scholar
Citrin, Jack, and Levy, Frank (1981) “From 13 to 4 and beyond: The political meaning of the ongoing tax revolt in California,” in Kaufman, George and Rosen, Kenneth (eds.) The Property Tax Revolt. Cambridge, MA: Balinger Publishing Co.: 127.Google Scholar
Edsall, Thomas Byrne (1991) Chain Reaction. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Egelko, Bob (1978) “Jarvis skips dues, says didn’t call Behr senile.” Long Beach Independent, 28 February.Google Scholar
Engle, Michael (1979) “Proposition 13: Whose tax revolt?Paper presented at the annual meeting of the New England Political Science Association, April, Durham, NH.Google Scholar
Field, Mervin (1978) “Sending a message: Californians strike back.” Public Opinion 42 (July/August): 37.Google Scholar
Fischel, William (1989) “Did Serrano cause Proposition 13?National Tax Journal 38 (December): 46574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, Jack (1978) “Jarvis reveals shrewd mind and ambitions.” Newark Star Ledger, 15 October.Google Scholar
Furlong, Tom (1978) “Jarvis’ Mr. Inside has outsize job.Long Beach Independent, 19 May.Google Scholar
Gann, Paul (1988) Paul Gann, Oral History Interview. Conducted 1987 and 1988 by Gabrielle Morris, Regional Oral History Office, University of California at Berkeley. California State Archives State Government Oral History Program.Google Scholar
Glenchur, Paul (1978) “Interview: Paul Gann, ‘Downhome’ crusader for the taxpayer.” The Guide (31 August): 45.Google Scholar
Goodwyn, Lawrence (1976) Democratic Promise: The Populist Moment in America. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
“Grass roots on airwaves to push 13” (1978) Los Angeles Times, 28 May.Google Scholar
Heard, Alexander (1960) The Costs of Democracy. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Hofstadter, Richard (1955) The Age of Reform. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Jarvis, Howard (1978) “Letter to members of the Apartment Owners Association,” 3 April.Google Scholar
Jarvis, Howard (1979a)The American tax revolt.” Distinguished Lecture Series, College of Business Administration, University of Cincinnati, 1 November. Howard Jarvis Collection, California State Library, Sacramento. Box 1671, Folder 5.Google Scholar
Jarvis, Howard (1979b) I’m Mad as Hell. New York: Times Books.Google Scholar
Kazin, Michael (1995) The Populist Persuasion: An American History. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Kelley, Stanley (1956) Professional Public Relations and Political Power. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Kershner, Viae (1978) “Anti-tax crusade is losing steam.” San Francisco Chronicle, 3 June.Google Scholar
Key, V. O., and Crouch, Winston (1939) The Initiative and the Referendum in California. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Kuttner, Robert (1980) Revolt of the Haves. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Lasch, Christopher (1991) The True and Only Heaven: Progress and Its Critics. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
“Last hope for tax relief: Brown willing to back Republican bill” (1978) Long Beach Independent, 1 February.Google Scholar
Lawrence, Steve (1978) “Peter Behr.” Long Beach Independent, 13 February.Google Scholar
Laycock, David (1990) Populism and Democratic Thought in the Canadian Prairies, 1910–1945. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
“Legislative, political attacks against Jarvis plan stepped up” (1978) Long Beach Independent, 28 February. Levin, Martin (1979) “Department of unintended consequences.” Taxing and Spending 2 (February): 1215.Google Scholar
Levy, Frank, and Zamolo, Paul (1978) “The preconditions of Proposition 13.” Working paper 1105–01. Washington: Urban Institute.Google Scholar
Lewis, Anthony (1978) New York Times, 24 November.Google Scholar
Lo, Clarence (1984) “Mobilizing the tax revolt,” in Ratcliff, Richard (ed.) Research in Social Movement Conflicts and Change 6: 293328.Google Scholar
Lo, Clarence (1990) Small Property versus Big Government. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Magleby, David (1984) Direct Legislation: Voting on Ballot Propositions in the United States. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magleby, David, and Patterson, Kelly (1998) “Consultants and direct democracy.” Political Science 31 (June): 16069.Google Scholar
McDougal, Dennis (1978) “Jarvis, at 75, nurses a rebellion.” Long Beach Independent, 12 March.Google Scholar
Monroe, Bill (1978) “Interview of Howard Jarvis on Meet the Press.” Washington: Kelly Press. Google Scholar
Musgrave, Richard (1979) “The tax revolt.” Social Science Quarterly 59 (March): 697703.Google Scholar
Oakland, William (1979) “Proposition 13: Genesis and consequences.” National Tax Journal 32 (June): 387409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oakland, William (1981) “Proposition 13: Genesis and consequences,” in Kaufman, George and Rosen, Kenneth (eds.) The Property Tax Revolt. Cambridge, MA: Balinger Publishing: 3163.Google Scholar
O’Sullivan, Arthur, Sexton, Terri, and Sheffrin, Steven (1995) Property Taxes and Tax Revolts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Political Animal (1978) “Campaign ‘78: The Jarvis amendment.” Los Angeles, 27 January.Google Scholar
“Property taxes and the revolt” (1978) Los Angeles Times, 9 May.Google Scholar
Rabushka, Alvin, and Ryan, Pauline (1982) The Tax Revolt. Stanford: Hoover Institution Press.Google Scholar
Salisbury, Ann (1978) “After 15 years on sideline, Howard Jarvis man of hour.” Herald Examiner, 7 June.Google Scholar
Scheibman, Jack (1978) “Jarvis, Behr in heated exchange.” Long Beach Independent, 13 May.Google Scholar
Schmidt, Bob (1978) “Jarvis opponents map plans to beat initiative.” Long Beach Independent, 20 January.Google Scholar
Schrag, Peter (1998) Paradise Lost: California’s Experience, America’s Future. New York: New Press.Google Scholar
Sears, David, and Citrin, Jack (1982) Tax Revolt: Something for Nothing in California. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Shultz, Jim (1996) The Initiative Cookbook. San Francisco: Democracy Center Advocacy Institute West.Google Scholar
Smith, Daniel (1996) “Populist entrepreneur: Douglas Bruce and the tax and government limitation moment in Colorado, 1986–1992.” Great Plains Research 6: 26994.Google Scholar
Smith, Daniel (1998a) “The legacy of Howard Jarvis and Proposition 13?: Tax limitation initiatives in 1996.” Paper presented at the Western Political Science Association conference, March, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Smith, Daniel (1998b) Tax Crusaders and the Politics of Direct Democracy. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Smith, Daniel (1998c) “Unmasking the tax crusaders.” State Government News 41 (March): 1821.Google Scholar
Smith, Eric, and Citrin, Jack (1979) “The building of a majority for tax limitation in California, 1968–1978.” Research report no. 1, State Data Program, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Soble, Ronald (1978) “Prop. 13 backers lead foes in fund raising.” Los Angeles Times, 31 May.Google Scholar
“Sound and fury over taxes” (1978) Time, 19 June.Google Scholar
“Taxpayers rebel, take the initiative” (1978) Los Angeles Times, 7 May.Google Scholar
Tracy, Phil (1978) “The Jarvis revolt: Rallying ‘round an old man’s obsession.” New West, 22 May, 17.Google Scholar
Turk, Herman (1979) “Imageries of social control.” Urban Life 8 (October): 33558.Google Scholar
Webber, Tracy (1996) “Making politics pay: Cashing in on causes.” Los Angeles Times, 3 March.Google Scholar
Wicker, Tom (1978) “A ‘new revolution.’” New York Times, 9 June.Google Scholar