Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T15:41:06.325Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Great Enrichment: A Humanistic and Social Scientific Account

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 November 2016

Deirdre Nansen McCloskey
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

From 1800 to the present the average person on the planet has been enriched in real terms by a factor of 10, or some 900 percent. In the ever-rising share of places from Belgium to Botswana, and now in China and India, that have agreed to the Bourgeois Deal—“Let me earn profits from creative destruction in the first act, and by the third act I will make all of you rich”—the factor is 30 in conventional terms and, if allowing for improved quality of goods and services, such as in improved glass and autos, or improved medicine and higher education, a factor of 100. That is, the reward from allowing ordinary people to have a go, the rise at first in northwestern Europe and then worldwide of economic liberty and social dignity, eroding ancient hierarchy and evading modern regulation, has been anything from 2,900 to 9,900 percent. What needs to be explained in a modern social science history is not the Industrial Revolution(s) but the Great Enrichment, one or two orders of magnitude larger than any previous change in human history. The article takes seriously the lesson of comparative history that Europe was not unique until 1700 and argues that ideas—specifically Bourgeois liberal ideas—not capital or institutions, made the modern world.

Type
Articles
Information
Social Science History , Volume 40 , Issue 4 , Winter 2016 , pp. 583 - 598
Copyright
Copyright © Social Science History Association, 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arendt, Hannah (1985 [1951]) The Origins of Modern Totalitarianism. New York: Harcourt.Google Scholar
Aristotle (1968 [1946]) (ca. 330 BCE) Politics, trans. Earnest Barker. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Berman, Sheri (2006) The Primacy of Politics: Social Democracy and the Making of Europe's Twentieth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Blainey, Geoffrey (2009) A Shorter History of Australia. North Sydney, NSW: Random House Australia.Google Scholar
Brailsford, Henry Noel (1961) The Levellers and the English Revolution. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Danford, John W. (2006) “‘Riches Valuable at All Times and to All Men’: Hume and the Eighteenth-Century Debate on Commerce and Liberty,” in Womersley, David (ed.) Liberty and American Experience in the Eighteenth Century. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund: 319–47.Google Scholar
Goldstone, Jack A. (2002) “Efflorescences and economic growth in world history: Rethinking the ‘rise of the West’ and the Industrial Revolution.” Journal of World History 13 (2): 323–89.Google Scholar
Horst, Han van der (1996) The Low Sky: Understanding the Dutch. Schiedam, The Netherlands: Scriptum.Google Scholar
Hume, David (1987 [1741–42]) Essays, Moral, Political and Literary, ed. Miller, Eugene F.. Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund.Google Scholar
Ibsen, Henrik (1965 [1877]) Ibsen: The Complete Major Prose and Plays, trans. and ed. Fjelde, R.. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
Jacob, Margaret C. (2001) The Enlightenment: A Brief History. Boston: Bedford/St. Martin's.Google Scholar
Jones, Eric L. (2010) Locating the Industrial Revolution: Inducement and Response. London: World Scientific.Google Scholar
Keynes, John Maynard (1936) The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Lal, Depak (1998) Unintended Consequences: The Impact of Factor Endowments, Culture, and Politics on Long-Run Economic Performance. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Lal, Depak (2006) Reviving the Invisible Hand: The Case for Classical Liberalism in the Twentieth Century. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
LaVaque-Manty, Mika (2006) “Dueling for equality: Masculine honor and the modern politics of dignity.” Political Theory 34 (6): 715–40.Google Scholar
Le Bris, David (2013) “Customary versus civil law within old regime France.” Unpublished paper, KEDGE Business School. http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/52123/1/MPRA_paper_52123.pdf (accessed November 12, 2014).Google Scholar
MacCulloch, Diarmaid (2004) The Reformation. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
McCloskey, Deirdre Nansen (2006) The Bourgeois Virtues: Ethics for an Age of Commerce. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
McCloskey, Deirdre Nansen (2007) “Thrift as a virtue, historically criticized.” Revue de Philosophie Economique 8 (December): 3–31.Google Scholar
McCloskey, Deirdre Nansen (2010) Bourgeois Dignity: Why Economics Can't Explain the Modern World. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
McCloskey, Deirdre Nansen (2016) Bourgeois Equality: How Ideas, Not Capital or Institutions, Enriched the World. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Mencken, H. L. (1916) A Little Book in C Major. New York: John Lane.Google Scholar
Mencken, H. L. (1949) A Mencken Chrestomathy: His Own Selection of His Choicest Writing. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
Moynahan, Brian (2002) The Faith: A History of Christianity. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Mueller, John (2011) War and Ideas: Selected Essays. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Neal, Larry, and Williamson, Jeffrey G., eds. (2014) The Cambridge History of Capitalism. Vol. 1, The Rise of Capitalism from Ancient Origins to 1848. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Needham, Joseph (1954–2008) Science and Civilization in China. 27 vols. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
North, Douglass C., Wallis, John Joseph, and Weingast, Barry R. (2009) Violence and Social Orders: A Conceptual Framework for Interpreting Recorded Human History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ogilvie, Sheilagh (2007) ‘Whatever is, is right’? Economic institutions in pre-industrial Europe.” Economic History Review 60 (4): 649–84.Google Scholar
Palmer, Tom G. (2009) Realizing Freedom: Libertarian Theory, History, and Practice. Washington, DC: Cato Institute.Google Scholar
Palmer, Tom G. (2014) “The political economy of empire and war,” in Palmer, Tom (ed.) Peace, War, and Liberty. Printed for the Atlas Network. Ottawa, IL: Jameson Books: 62–82.Google Scholar
Parks, Tim (2005) Medici Money: Banking, Metaphysics, and Art in Fifteenth-Century Florence. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Pomeranz, Kenneth (2000) The Great Divergence: China, Europe, and the Making of the Modern World Economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Reckendrees, Alfred (2014) “Weimar Germany: The first open access order that failed.” Unpublished essay Copenhagen Business School, Department of Management, Politics, and Philosophy, Center for Business History. Freiburger Diskussionspapiere zur Ordnungsökonomik, no. 14/05. http://hdl.handle.net/10419/97511 (accessed December 12, 2014).Google Scholar
Ringmar, Erik (2007) Why Europe Was First: Social Change and Economic Growth in Europe and East Asia 1500–2050. London: Anthem.Google Scholar
Taylor, Charles (1989) Sources of the Self: The Making of the Modern Identity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, Charles (2007) A Secular Age. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Yeats, William Butler (1992 [1928]) The Poems, ed. Albright, Daniel. London: Everyman.Google Scholar