No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Googles of the Past
Concordances and Scholarship
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 04 January 2016
Abstract
This article examines whether published keyword indexes to 22 British poets had any measurable effect on scholarly production related to those poets, mainly using quantitative output measures, since these are all that is available. It also draws on archival information about the individual concordances and their origins. The article tests whether concordances facilitated scholarship, or were a by-product/correlative of scholarship, or were unrelated to scholarship. The preponderance of the evidence leans toward the by-product hypothesis. More important, given the centrality of keyword indexing today, the evidence is mostly inconsistent with the facilitation argument. It is most likely that concordances emerged as a by-product and adjunct to scholarship and that their main use was by undergraduates, amateurs, and others below the elite level. Implications for the present are briefly discussed.
- Type
- Articles
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Social Science History Association 2013
References
Abbott, A. (2008) “The traditional future: A computational theory of library research.” College and Research Libraries 69 (6): 524–45.Google Scholar
Abbott, A. (2011) “Library research infrastructure for humanistic and social scientific scholarship in America in the twentieth century,” in Camic, C.Gross, N.Lamont, M. (eds.) Social Knowledge in the Making. Chicago: University of Chicago Press: 43–87.Google Scholar
Abbott, A. (2014) “The excellence of IT,” in Herbst, M. (ed.) The Institution of Science and the Science of Institutions. Dordrecht: Springer: 145–66.Google Scholar
Bartlett, J. (1896) A New and Complete Concordance or Verbal Index to Words, Phrases, and Passages in the Dramatic Works of Shakespeare. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Becker, R. (1978) “Materials for English historical linguistics: An annotated bibliography of concordances.” Journal of English Linguistics 12 (1): 1–11.Google Scholar
Burton, D. M. (1981a) “Automated concordances and word indexes: The fifties.” Computers and the Humanities 15 (1): 1–14.Google Scholar
Burton, D. M. (1981b) “Automated concordances and word indexes: The early sixties and the early centers.” Computers and the Humanities 15 (2): 83–100.Google Scholar
Burton, D. M. (1981c) “Automated concordances and word indexes: The process, the programs, and the products.” Computers and the Humanities 15 (3): 139–54.Google Scholar
Burton, D. M. (1982) “Automated concordances and word indexes: Machine decisions and editorial revisions.” Computers and the Humanities 16 (4): 195–218.Google Scholar
Cook, A. S., ed. (1908) A Concordance to the English Poems of Thomas Gray. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Cruden, A. (1949 [1789]) Cruden's Complete Concordance to the Old and New Testaments. Philadelphia: John Winston.Google Scholar
Howard, P., comp. and ed. (1973) Theses in American Literature, 1896-1971. Ann Arbor, MI: Pierian.Google Scholar
Hyder, C. K., comp. and ed. (1940) A Concordance to the Poems of A. E. Housman. Lawrence: University of Kansas.Google Scholar
Kennedy, A. G. (1942) “The making and use of a concordance.” American Speech 17 (4): 255–59.Google Scholar
Manly, J.Rickert, E. (1940) The Text of “The Canterbury Tales” Studied on the Basis of All Known Manuscripts. 8 vols. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
McNamee, L. F. (1968) Dissertations in English and American Literature. New York: Bowker.Google Scholar
Salganick, M. J.Watts, D. J. (2009) “Web-based experiments for the study of collective social dynamics in cultural markets.” Topics in Cognitive Science 1 (3): 439–68.Google Scholar
Tatlock, J. S. P. (1923) “The Chaucer concordance.” Modern Language Notes 38 (8): 504–6.Google Scholar
Wright, L. B. (1931) “Handbook learning of the Renaissance middle class.” Studies in Philology 28 (1): 58–86.Google Scholar