Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T15:05:18.287Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Gender in/and Social Science History

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 January 2016

Barbara Laslett
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In his presidential address to the American Statistical Association in 1931, William Fielding Ogburn, an American sociologist important particularly in the 1920s, 1930s, and 1940s, took as his theme the difference between statistics and art. His argument, articulated here and in a wide range of writings throughout his career, was that “statistics has been developed to give an exact picture of reality, while the picture that the artist draws is a distortion of reality” (Ogburn 1932: 1). He then went on to express his belief that emotion leads to distortion in our observations. “It is this distorting influence of emotion and wishes,” he said, “that is more responsible for bad thinking than any lack of logic” (ibid.: 4). But statistics, he believed, could ameliorate the distorting effects of emotion on our empirical observations. There was a problem, however, because “the artist in us wants understanding rather than statistics. But understanding is hardly knowledge. . . . The tests of knowledge are reliability and accuracy, not understanding” (ibid.: 5).

Type
President’s Address
Information
Social Science History , Volume 16 , Issue 2 , Summer 1992 , pp. 177 - 195
Copyright
Copyright © Social Science History Association 1992 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abrams, Philip (1982) Historical Sociology. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Anderson, Margo (forthcoming) “The history of women and the history of statistics.” Journal of Women’s History.Google Scholar
Antler, Joyce (1987) Lucy Sprague Mitchell: The Making of a Modern Woman. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Bannister, Robert (1987) Sociology and Scientism: The American Quest for Objectivity, 1880-1940. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Brenner, Johanna, and Laslett, Barbara (1986) “Social reproduction and the family,” in Ulf Himmelstrant (ed.) Sociology from Crisis to Science? Vol. 2, The Social Reproduction of Organization and Culture. London: Sage: 116-31.Google Scholar
Brenner, Johanna, and Laslett, Barbara (1991) “Gender, social reproduction, and women’s self-organization: Considering the U.S. welfare state.” Gender and Society 5: 311-33.Google Scholar
Brown, Victoria Bissell (1990) “The fear of feminization: Los Angeles high schools in the Progressive era.” Feminist Studies 16: 493–518.Google Scholar
Brumberg, Joan J., and Tomes, Nancy (1982) “Women in the professions: A research agency for American historians.” Reviews in American History 10: 275-96.Google Scholar
Chodorow, Nancy (1990) “The power of feelings: Personal meaning and the psychoanalytic encounter.” Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Coser, Lewis A. (1978) “American trends,” in Bottomore, Tom and Nisbet, Robert (eds.) A History of Sociological Analysis. New York: Basic Books: 287–320.Google Scholar
Cott, Nancy (1987) The Grounding of Modern Feminism. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Davidoff, Leonore (1990) “‘Adam spoke first and named the order of the world’: Masculine and feminine domains in history and sociology,” in Corr, Helen and Jamieson, Lynn (eds.) Politics of Everyday Life: Continuity and Change in Work and the Family. New York: St. Martin’s: 229-55.Google Scholar
Deacon, Desley (1988) “Elsie Clews Parsons, New York woman.” Paper presented at the meetings of the American Anthropological Association, Phoenix, AZ, November.Google Scholar
Deacon, Desley (1990) “Strenuous science: Elsie Clews Parsons’ turn to anthropology.” Paper presented at the meetings of the American Studies Association, New Orleans, LA, November.Google Scholar
Deegan, Mary Jo (1988) Jane Addams and the Men of the Chicago School, 1892-1918. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.Google Scholar
D’Emilio, John (1983) “Capitalism and gay identity,” in Snitow, Ann, Stansell, Christine, and Thompson, Sharon (eds.) Powers of Desire: The Politics of Sexuality. New York: Monthly Review: 100–116.Google Scholar
D’Emilio, John and Freedman, Estelle B. (1988) Intimate Matters: A History of Sexuality in America. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Evans, Sara (1989) Born for Liberty: A History of Women in America. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Fitzpatrick, Ellen (1990) Endless Crusade: Women Social Scientists and Progressive Reform. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Furner, Mary O. (1975) Advocacy and Objectivity: A Crisis in the Professionalization of American Social Science, 1865-1904. Lexington: University Press of Kentucky.Google Scholar
Gordon, Linda (1991) “Black and white visions of welfare: Women’s welfare activism, 1890-1945.” Journal of American History 78: 559-90.Google Scholar
Gordon, Linda (forthcoming) “Social insurance and public assistance: The influence of gender in welfare thought in the U.S., 1890-1935.” American Historical Review.Google Scholar
Gordon, Lynn D. (1990) Gender and Higher Education in the Progressive Era. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Hanawalt, Barbara A. (1991) “The voices and audiences of social history records.” Social Science History 15: 159-75.Google Scholar
Harding, Sandra (1986) The Science Question in Feminism. Ithaca, NV: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Haskell, Thomas (1984) The Emergence of Professional Social Science: The American Social Science Association and the Nineteenth-Century Crisis of Authority. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Horowitz, Helen Lefkowitz (1984) Alma Mater: Design and Experience in the Women’s Colleges from Their Nineteenth-Century Beginnings to the 1930s. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
Keller, Evelyn Fox (1985) Reflections on Gender and Science. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Kerber, Linda K. (1988) “Separate spheres, female worlds, woman’s place: The rhetoric of women’s history.” Journal of American History 75: 9–39.Google Scholar
Laslett, Barbara (1990) “Unfeeling knowledge: Emotion and objectivity in the history of sociology.” Sociological Forum 5: 413-33.Google Scholar
Laslett, Barbara (1991) “Biography as historical sociology: The case of William Fielding Ogburn.” Theory and Society 20: 511-38.Google Scholar
Laslett, Barbara and Brenner, Johanna (1989) “Gender and social reproduction: Historical perspectives.” Annual Review of Sociology 15: 381–404.Google Scholar
Leach, William (1989) True Love and Perfect Union: The Feminist Reform of Sex and Society. 2d ed., Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press.Google Scholar
Lepenies, Wolf (1988) Between Literature and Science: The Rise of Sociology. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McCloskey, Donald N. (1985) The Rhetoric of Economics. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
McCloskey, Donald N. (1990) “Ancients and moderns.” Social Science History 14: 289–303.Google Scholar
Mahoney, Maureen A., and Yngvesson, Barbara (forthcoming) “The construction of subjectivity and the paradox of resistance: Reintegrating feminist anthropology and psychology.” Signs.Google Scholar
Novick, Peter (1988) That Noble Dream: The “Objectivity Question” and the American Historical Profession. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ogburn, William Fielding (1930) “The folkways of a scientific sociology.” Scientific Monthly 30: 300–306.Google Scholar
Ogburn, William Fielding (1932) “Statistics and art.” Journal of the American Statistical Associa tion 27: 1–8.Google Scholar
Ogburn, William Fielding (1948) Journals of William Fielding Ogburn, 6 March. Ogburn Collection, Regenstein Library, University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Ogburn, William Fielding (1959) Letter to Dorothy O. Johansen, 10 March. Reed College Archive, Portland, OR.Google Scholar
Rosaldo, Renato (1984) “Grief and a headhunter’s rage: On the cultural force of emotions,” in Bruner, Edward M. (ed.) Text, Play, and Story: The Construction and Reconstruction of Self and Society. Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland: 178-95.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, Rosalind (1982) Beyond Separate Spheres: Intellectual Roots of Modern Feminism. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Ross, Dorothy (1978) “Socialism and American liberalism: Academic thought in the 1880’s.” Perspectives in American History 11: 7–79.Google Scholar
Ross, Dorothy (1991) The Origins of American Social Science. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ryan, Mary P. (1981) Cradle of the Middle Class: The Family in Oneida County, New York, 1790-1865. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Scott, Joan W. (1988) Gender and the Politics of History. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Dorothy E. (1987) The Everyday World as Problematic: A Feminist Sociology. Boston: Northeastern University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Dorothy E. (1990) The Conceptual Practices of Power: A Feminist Sociology of Knowledge. Boston: Northeastern University Press.Google Scholar
Smith-Rosenberg, Carroll (1985) Disorderly Conduct: Visions of Gender in Victorian America. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Turner, Stephen Park, and Turner, Jonathan H. (1990) The Impossible Science: An Institutional Analysis of American Sociology. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Vesey, Lawrence R. (1965) The Emergence of the American University. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Ware, Susan (1987) Partner and I: Molly Dewson, Feminism, and New Deal Politics. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar