Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T10:58:25.341Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

From Reconstruction to Reform: Modernization and the Interest Group State, 1875–1900

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 October 2017

Adam Chamberlain ,
Alixandra B. Yanus  and
Nicholas Pyeatt
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The rise of voluntary associations in the late nineteenth century has received significant scholarly attention over the last few decades. Some studies argue that modernization facilitates group formation, but other analyses (e.g., Crowley and Skocpol 2001; Gamm and Putnam 1999) find little support for the argument that modernization caused group formation. Here, we extend this debate to the study of the strength of state-level, voluntary associations with clear political objectives. Using state-level dues paid to national organizations as a measure of group strength, we find evidence that more modernized states typically had the strongest state-level organizations in the 1880s and 1890s. These empirical findings lend support to the modernization thesis but also suggest that group formation and strength may be explained by different processes.

Type
Articles
Information
Social Science History , Volume 41 , Issue 4 , Winter 2017 , pp. 705 - 730
Copyright
Copyright © Social Science History Association, 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Berthoff, R. (1971) An Unsettled People: Social Order and Disorder in American History. New York: Harper and Row Publishers.Google Scholar
Bosso, C. (2005) Environment, Inc.: From Grassroots to Beltway. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar
Carter, D. B., & Signorino, C. S. (2010) “Back to the future: Modeling time dependence in binary data.” Political Analysis 18 (3): 271–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Congleton, R. D. (2004) “Economic development and democracy: Does industrialization lead to universal suffrage.” Homo Oeconomicus 21 (2): 283–311.Google Scholar
Crowley, J. E., & Skocpol, T. (2001) “The rush to organize: Explaining associational formation in the United States, 1860s–1920s.” American Journal of Political Science 45 (4): 813–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dearing, M. R. (1952) Veterans in Politics: The Story of the G.A.R. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press.Google Scholar
Department of Commerce and Labor, Bureau of the Census. (1897) Compendium of the 11th Census: 1890, Part III. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Department of Commerce and Labor, Bureau of the Census. (1906) Special Reports: Telephones and Telegraph, 1902. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Department of Commerce and Labor, Bureau of the Census. (1907) Special Reports of the Census Office: Wealth, Debt, and Taxation. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Department of the Interior, Bureau of Education. (1920) The Problems of Mathematics in Secondary Education, Bulletin No. 1. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Dyer, F. (1908) A Compendium of the War of Rebellion. Vol. 1. Des Moines, IA: Dyer.Google Scholar
Gamm, G., & Putnam, R. D. (1999) “ The growth of voluntary associations in America, 1840–1940 .” Journal of Interdisciplinary History 29 (4): 511–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harper, I. H. (1922) The History of Woman Suffrage. Vol. 5. New York: J. J. Little and Ives Company, for the National American Woman Suffrage Association.Google Scholar
Herring, P. (1967 [1929]) Group Representation before Congress. New York: Russell dan Russell.Google Scholar
Keller, M. (1977) Affairs of State: Public Life in Late Nineteenth Century America. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McConnell, S. (1992) Glorious Contentment: The Grand Army of the Republic, 1865–1900. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
McFarland, A. S. (1991) “Interest groups and political time: Cycles in America.” British Journal of Political Science 21 (3): 257–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mueller, D. C. (1984) “An examination of the factors affecting the formation of interest groups in OECD countries.” Public Choice 43 (2): 151–71.Google Scholar
Mueller, D. C., & Murrell, P. (1986) “Interest groups and the size of government.” Public Choice 48 (2): 125–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Grange of the Patrons of Husbandry. (Various years, 1875–1900) Proceedings of the National Grange of the Patrons of Husbandry. Various Publishers.Google Scholar
Nordin, D. S. (1974) Rich Harvest: A History of the Grange, 1867–1900. Jackson: University Press of Mississippi.Google Scholar
Olson, M. (1982) The Rise and Decline of Nations: Economic Growth, Stagflation, and Social Rigidities. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Patterson, K. D., & Singer, M. (2007) “Targeting success: The enduring power of the NRA,” in Cigler, A. J. & Loomis, B. A. (eds.), Interest Groups Politics, 7th ed. Washington, DC: C. Q. Press: 37–64.Google Scholar
Salisbury, R. H. (1969) “An exchange theory of interest groups.” Midwest Journal of Political Science 13 (1): 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skocpol, T., Ganz, M., & Munson, Z. (2000) “A nation of organizers: The institutional origins of civic voluntarism in the United States.” The American Political Science Review 94 (3): 527–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Statistician to the Commission. (1901) Statistics of Railways in the United States, Thirteenth Volume. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Steuart, W. M. (1905a) Special Reports: Street and Electric Railways, 1902. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Steuart, W. M. (1905b) Special Reports: Central Electric Light and Power Stations, 1902. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Tichenor, D. J., & Harris, R. A. (2002–3) “Organized interests and American political development.” Political Science Quarterly 117 (4): 587–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tichenor, D. J., & Harris, R. A. (2005) “The development of interest group politics in America: Beyond the conceits of modern times.” Annual Review of Political Science 8: 251–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Truman, D. B. (1981 [1951]) The Governmental Process. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
Tyler, H. E. (1949) Where Prayer and Purpose Meet: The WCTU Story. Evanston, IL: The Signal Press.Google Scholar
U.S. Census Bureau. U.S. Census (Various Years 1870, 1880, 1890, 1900). Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
White, J. B. (n.d.) Women's Suffrage in Utah. Utah History to Go (http://historytogo.utah.gov/utah_chapters/statehood_and_the_progressive_era/womenssuffrageinutah.html), from Utah History Encyclopedia (accessed May 17, 2015).Google Scholar
Wiebe, R. H. (1967) The Search for Order, 1877–1920. New York: Hill and Wang.Google Scholar
Woman's Temperance Publication Association. (Various years, 1875–94) Minutes of the National Woman's Christian Temperance Union. Chicago: Woman's Temperance Publication Association.Google Scholar
Woman's Temperance Publication Association. (Various years, 1895–1900) Report of the National Woman's Christian Temperance Union. Chicago: Woman's Temperance Publication Association.Google Scholar