Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T13:49:59.676Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Fraternalism, Paternalism, the Family, and the Market: Insurance a Century Ago

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 January 2016

Extract

They helped every one his neighbor; and every one said to his brother, Be of good courage.—Isaiah 41:6

By the end of the nineteenth century most of the economically advanced European nations had adopted some form of public social insurance. In the world’s richest nation, however, widows and the aged, sick, and injured received little support from the state. Without the help of the state, how did American workers and their families survive in the face of sickness, accidents, old age, or the death of the primary earner? The traditional answer is that they survived rather badly, if at all. Social reformers of the early twentieth century and most modern historians argue that voluntarism was a failure, that it was not suited to the needs of an increasingly industrialized, urbanized populace.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Social Science History Association 1991 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Buffum, David, and Whaples, Robert (1987) “Employee-based discrimination, 1889: Fear and lathing in the Michigan furniture industry.” Paper presented at the Cliometrics Society session of the Allied Social Sciences Association Meetings, Chicago, December.Google Scholar
Burnett, John, and Palmer, Bruce (1984) “Examining life insurance ownership through demographic and psychographic characteristics.Journal of Risk and Insurance 51: 453-67.Google Scholar
Carter, Susan, and Sutch, Richard (1989) “Micro-level data sets suitable for investigation of macroeconomic issues extracted from reports of the state bureaus of labor statistics, circa 1890.Working Paper No. 89-114. Berkeley: University of California, Institute of Business and Economic Research.Google Scholar
Clawson, Mary Ann (1989) Constructing Brotherhood: Class, Gender, and Fraternalism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Clough, Shepard (1946) A Century of Life Insurance: A History of the Mutual Life Insurance Company of New York, 1843-1943. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Goldin, Claudia (1986) “The female labor force and American economic growth, 1890-1980,” in Engerman, Stanley and Gallman, Robert (eds.) Long-Term Factors in American Economic Growth. Chicago: University of Chicago Press: 557604.Google Scholar
Holmes, Amy, and Vinovskis, Maris (1990) “The impact of the Civil War on American widowhood.” Paper presented at the Conference on Demographic Perspectives on the American Family: Patterns and Prospects, Albany, NY, April.Google Scholar
Jacoby, Sanford (1985) Employing Bureaucracy: Managers, Unions, and the Transformation of Work in American Industry, 1900-45. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Keller, Morton (1963) The Life Insurance Enterprise, 1895-1910. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Kip, Richard (1951) “Fraternal life insurance.” Ph.D. diss., University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Lebergott, Stanley (1964) Manpower in Economic Growth. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Licht, Walter (1983) Working for the Railroad: The Organization of Work in the Nineteenth Century. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Lubove, Roy (1986 [1968]) The Struggle for Social Security, 1900-1935. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
Michigan Bureau of Labor and Industrial Statistics (1890) Seventh Annual Report. Lansing: State Printer.Google Scholar
Nelson, Daniel (1975) Managers and Workers: Origins of the New Factory System in the United States, 1880-1920. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
O’Brien, Anthony (1988) “Factory size, economies of scale, and the great merger wave of 1898-1902.Journal of Economic History 48: 639-49.Google Scholar
Pease, George Sexton (1967) Patriarch of the Prairie: The Story of Equitable of Iowa, 1867-1967. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
Pritchett, B. Michael (1985) Financing Growth: A Financial History of American Life Insurance through 1900. Homewood, IL: Irwin.Google Scholar
Ransom, Roger, and Sutch, Richard (1987) “Tontine insurance and the Armstrong investigation: A case of stifled innovation, 1868-1905.Journal of Economic History 47: 379-90.Google Scholar
Riley, James (1987) “Disease without death: New sources for a history of sickness.” Journal of Interdisciplinary History 17: 537-63.Google Scholar
Riley, James (1989) Sickness, Recovery, and Death: A History and Forecast of Ill Health. Iowa City: University of Iowa Press.Google Scholar
Ryskamp, Henry Jacob (1930) “The Dutch in western Michigan.” Ph.D. diss., University of Michigan.Google Scholar
Stalson, J. Owen (1942) Marketing Life Insurance: Its History in America. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Steckel, Richard (1988) “The health and mortality of women and children, 1850-1860.” Journal of Economic History 48: 333-45.Google Scholar
Thompson, E. P. (1966) The Making of the English Working Class. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
Uhlenberg, Peter (1980) “Death and the family.” Journal of Family History 5: 313-20.Google Scholar
U.S. Bureau of the Census (1936) United States Life Tables, 1929 to 1931, 1920 to 1929, 1919 to 1921, 1909 to 1911, 1901 to 1910, 1900 to 1902. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
U.S. Bureau of the Census (1975) Historical Statistics of the United States, Colonial Times to 1970. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
U.S. Bureau of the Census (1984) 1980 Census of Population. Vol. 1, Characteristics of the Popula tion. Chap. D, “Detailed population characteristics.” Pt. 1, “United States summary.” Sec. A, “United States, Tables 253-310.” Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
U.S. Census Office (1894-95) Report on the Insurance Business in the United States at the Eleventh Census: 1890. Pt. 2, Life Insurance. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
U.S. National Center for Health Statistics (1985) U.S. Decennial Life Tables for 1979-81, vol. 1, no. 1. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Whaples, Robert (1989) “‘The problem of old age’: Older males, retirement, and the industrial scrap heap.” Paper presented at the Second World Clio-metrics Conference, Santander, Spain, June, and at the Social Science History Association Meetings, Washington, DC, November.Google Scholar
Whaples, Robert (1990) “The shortening of the American work week: An economic and historical analysis of its context, causes, and consequences.” Ph.D. diss., University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Williamson, Harold F., and Smalley, Orange A. (1957) Northwestern Mutual Life: A Century of Trusteeship. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Zelizer, Viviana (1979) Morals and Markets: The Development of Life Insurance in the United States. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Zunz, Olivier (1982) The Changing Face of Inequality: Urbanization, Industrial Development, and Immigration in Detroit, 1880-1920. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar