Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T18:24:47.782Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Corporatism and State Theory

A Review Essay for Historians

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 January 2016

Larry G. Gerber
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Over the last twenty years political scientists and sociologists concerned primarily with western European developments since 1945 have attempted to define corporatism as an ideal model for use in analyzing this region's political economies. Several influential American historians in recent years have also employed the concept of corporatism in examining the development of the modern American political economy. Although these historians have not ignored the contemporary European-oriented social science literature, the relationship between the work of historians describing the evolution of America's political economy and the theoretical literature based primarily on more recent European experiences and European concerns remains problematic.

Type
Articles
Information
Social Science History , Volume 19 , Issue 3 , Fall 1995 , pp. 313 - 332
Copyright
Copyright © Social Science History Association 1995 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alford, R. R., and Friedland, R. (1985) Powers of Theory: Capitalism, the State, and Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Almond, G. A. (1983) “Corporatism, pluralism, and professional memory.” World Politics 35: 245–60.Google Scholar
Anderson, J. J. (1992) The Territorial Imperative: Pluralism, Corporatism, and Economic Crisis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bade, B., and Birnbaum, P. (1983) The Sociology of the State. Trans. Arthur Goldhammer. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Beer, S. H. (1969) British Politics in the Collectivist Age. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
Berger, S., ed. (1981) Organizing Interests in Western Europe: Pluralism, Corporatism, and the Transformation of Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Birnbaum, P. (1982) “The state versus corporatism.” Politics and Society 11: 477–501.Google Scholar
Block, F. (1987) Revising State Theory: Essays in Politics and Postindustfialism. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Brand, D. R. (1988) Corporatism and the Rule of Law: A Study of the National Recovery Administration. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Carnoy, M. (1984) The State and Political Theory. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Cawson, A. (1978) “Pluralism, corporatism, and the role of the state.” Government and Opposition 13: 178–98.Google Scholar
Cawson, A. (1986) Corporatism and Political Theory. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Coates, D. (1984) “Corporatism and the state in theory and practice,” in Harrison, M. L. (ed.) Corporatism and the Welfare State. Aldershott, U.K.: Gower: 122–35.Google Scholar
Cox, A. (1988) “Neo-corporatism versus the corporate state,” in Cox, A. and O'Sullivan, N. (eds.) The Corporate State: Corporatism and the State Tradition in Western Europe. Aldershott, U.K.: Edward Elgar: 27–47.Google Scholar
Cox, A., and O'Sullivan, N., eds. (1988) The Corporate State: Corporatism and the State Tradition in Western Europe. Aldershott, U.K.: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Crouch, C. (1983) “Pluralism and the new corporatism: A rejoinder.” Political Studies 31: 452–60.Google Scholar
Crouch, C., ed. (1979) State and Economy in Contemporary Capitalism. New York: St. Martin's.Google Scholar
Crouch, C., and Dore, R., eds. (1990) Corporatism and Accountability: Organized Interests in British Public Life. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Dyson, K. H. F. (1980) The State Tradition in Western Europe: A Study of an Idea and Institution. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Elkin, S. (1985) “Pluralism in its place: State and regime in liberal democracy,” in Benjamin, R. and Elkin, S. (eds.) The Democratic State. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar
Evans, P. B., Rueschemeyer, D., and Skocpol, T., eds. (1985) Bringing the State Back In. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gilbert, J. (1972) Designing the Industrial State: The Intellectual Pursuit of Collectivism in America, 1880–1940. Chicago: Quadrangle.Google Scholar
Grant, W., ed. (1985) The Political Economy of Corporatism. New York: St. Martin's.Google Scholar
Griffith, R. (1982) “Dwight D. Eisenhower and the corporate commonwealth.” American Historical Review 87: 87–122.Google Scholar
Harrison, R. (1980) Pluralism and Corporatism: The Political Evolution of Modern Democracies. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Hawley, E. W. (1968) “Secretary Hoover and the bituminous coal problem, 1921–1928.” Business History Review 42: 247–70.Google Scholar
Hawley, E. W. (1974) “Herbert Hoover, the Commerce secretariat, and the vision of an ‘associative state.’” Journal of American History 61: 116–40.Google Scholar
Hawley, E. W. (1978) “The discovery and study of a ‘corporate liberalism.’” Business History Review 52: 309–20.Google Scholar
Hawley, E. W. (1981a) “Herbert Hoover and economic stabilization, 1921–22,” in Hawley, E. W. (ed.) Herbert Hoover as Secretary of Commerce: Studies in New Era Thought and Practice. Iowa City: University of Iowa Press: 43–77.Google Scholar
Hawley, E. W. (1981b) “Three facets of Hooverian associationalism: Lumber, aviation, and movies, 1921–1930,” in McGraw, T. K. (ed.) Regulation in Historical Perspective: Historical Essays. Boston: Harvard Business School: 95–123.Google Scholar
Hawley, E. W. (1986) “The corporate ideal as liberal philosophy in the New Deal,” in Cohen, W. J. (ed.) The Roosevelt New Deal: A Program Assessment Fifty Years After. Austin, TX: Lyndon B. Johnson School of Public Affairs: 85–103.Google Scholar
Hawley, E. W. (1988) “Social policy and the liberal state in twentieth-century America,” in Critchlow, D. T. and Hawley, E. W. (eds.) Federal Social Policy: The Historical Dimension. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press: 117–39.Google Scholar
Hawley, E. W. (1992 [1979]) The Great War and the Search for a Modern Order: A History of the American People and Their Institutions, 1917–1933. New York: St. Martin's.Google Scholar
Hogan, M. J. (1987) The Marshall Plan: America, Britain, and the Reconstruction of Western Europe. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jessop, B. (1982) The Capitalist State: Marxist Theories and Methods. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Jordan, A. G. (1981) “Iron triangles, woolly corporatism and elastic nets: Images of the policy process.” Journal of Public Policy 1: 96–123.Google Scholar
Kariel, H. S. (1961) The Decline of American Pluralism. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Kolko, G. (1967 [1963]) The Triumph of Conservatism: A Reinterpretation of American History, 1900–1916. Chicago: Quadrangle.Google Scholar
Lehmbruch, G. (1979a) “Consociational democracy, class conflict, and the new corporatism,” in Schmitter, P. C. and Lehmbruch, G. (eds.) Trends toward Corporatist Intermediation. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage: 53–61.Google Scholar
Lehmbruch, G. (1979b) “Liberal corporatism and party government,” in Schmitter, P. C. and Lehmbruch, G. (eds.) Trends toward Corporatist Intermediation. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage: 147–83.Google Scholar
Lehmbruch, G., and Schmitter, P. C., eds. (1982) Patterns of Corporatist Policy-Making. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Lichtenstein, N. (1982) Labor's War at Home: The CIO in World War II. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lichtenstein, N. (1989) “From corporatism to collective bargaining: Organized labor and the eclipse of social democracy in the postwar era,” in Fraser, S. and Gerstle, G. (eds.) The Rise and Fall of the New Deal Order. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press: 122–52.Google Scholar
Lowi, T. J. (1979 [1969]) The End of Liberalism: The Second Republic of the United States. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
McConnell, G. (1966) Private Power and American Democracy. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
McQuaid, K. (1978) “Corporate liberalism in the American business community, 1920–1940.” Business History Review 52: 342–68.Google Scholar
Martin, R. M. (1983) “Pluralism and the new corporatism.” Political Studies 31: 86–102.Google Scholar
Middlemas, K. (1979) Politics in Industrial Society: The Experience of the British System since 1911. London: Andre Deutsch.Google Scholar
Miliband, R. (1969) The State in Capitalist Society: An Analysis of the Western System of Power. New York: Basic.Google Scholar
Nedelmann, B., and Meier, K. G. (1977) “Theories of contemporary corporatism: Static or dynamic?” Comparative Political Studies 10: 39–60.Google Scholar
Nettl, J. P. (1968) “The state as a conceptual variable.” World Politics 20: 559–92.Google Scholar
Nicholls, D. (1974) Three Varieties of Pluralism. New York: St. Martin's.Google Scholar
Nordlinger, E. A. (1981) On the Autonomy of the Democratic State. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
O'Sullivan, N. (1988) “The political theory of neo-corporatism,” in Cox, A. and O'Sullivan, N. (eds.) The Corporate State: Corporatism and the State Tradition in Western Europe. Aldershott, U.K.: Edward Elgar: 3–26.Google Scholar
Pahl, R. E., and Winkler, J. T. (1975) “The coming corporatism.” Challenge 18: 28–35.Google Scholar
Panitch, L. (1980) “Recent theorizations of corporatism: Reflections on a growth industry.” British Journal of Sociology 31: 159–87.Google Scholar
Panitch, L. (1981) “Trade unions and the state.” New Left Review, no. 125: 21–43.Google Scholar
Pekkarinen, J., Pohjola, M., and Rowthorn, B., eds. (1992) Social Corporatism: A Superior Economic System? Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Pike, F. B., and Stritch, T., eds. (1974) The New Corporatism: Social-Political Structures in the Iberian World. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Poulantzas, N. (1972) “The problem of the capitalist state,” in Blackburn, R. (ed.) Ideology in the Social Sciences. London: Fontana: 238–53.Google Scholar
Radosh, R. (1967) “The development of the corporate ideology of American labor leaders, 1914–1933.” Ph.D. diss., University of Wisconsin.Google Scholar
Radosh, R. (1970 [1966]) “The corporate ideology of American labor leaders from Gompers to Hillman,” in Weinstein, J. and Eakins, D. W. (eds.) For a New America: Essays in History and Politics from Studies on the Left, 1959–1967. New York: Vintage: 125–52.Google Scholar
Salisbury, R. H. (1979) “Why no corporatism in America?” in Schmitter, P. C. and Lehmbruch, G. (eds.) Trends toward Corporatist Intermediation. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage: 213–30.Google Scholar
Schattschneider, E. E. (1960) The Semi-Sovereign People: A Realist's View of Democracy in America. Hinsdale, IL: Dryden.Google Scholar
Scheinberg, S. J. (1966) “The development of corporation labor policy, 1900–1940.” Ph.D. diss., University of Wisconsin.Google Scholar
Schmitter, P. C. (1979a) “Modes of interest intermediation and models of societal change in Western Europe,” in Schmitter, P. C. and Lehmbruch, G. (eds.) Trends toward Corporatist Intermediation. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage: 63–94.Google Scholar
Schmitter, P. C. (1979b [1974]) “Still the century of corporatism,” in Schmitter, P. C. and Lehmbruch, G. (eds.) Trends toward Corporatist Intermediation. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage: 7–52.Google Scholar
Schmitter, P. C. (1985) “Neo-corporatism and the state,” in Grant, W. (ed.) The Political Economy of Corporatism. New York: St. Martin's: 32–62.Google Scholar
Schmitter, P. C., and G., Lehmbruch, eds. (1979) Trends toward Corporatist Intermediation. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Shonfield, A. (1969 [1965]) Modern Capitalism: The Changing Balance of Public and Private Power. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sklar, M. J. (1970 [I960]) “Woodrow Wilson and the political economy of modern United States liberalism,” in Weinstein, J. and Eakins, D. W. (eds.) For a New America: Essays in History and Politics from Studies on the Left, 1959–1967. New York: Vintage: 46–100.Google Scholar
Skocpol, T. (1980) “Political response to capitalist crisis: Neo-Marxist theories of the state and the case of the New Deal.” Politics and Society 10: 155–201.Google Scholar
Skocpol, T., and Finegold, K. (1982) “State capacity and economic intervention in the early New Deal.” Political Science Quarterly 97: 255–78.Google Scholar
Strinati, D. (1982) Capitalism, the State, and Industrial Relations. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Tarantelli, E. (1986) “The regulation of inflation and unemployment.” Industrial Relations 25: 1–15.Google Scholar
Weinstein, J. (1969 [1968]) The Corporate Ideal in the Liberal State, 1900–1918. Boston: Beacon.Google Scholar
Williamson, P. J. (1985) Varieties of Corporatism: A Conceptual Discussion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Williamson, P. J. (1989) Corporatism in Perspective: An Introductory Guide to Corporatist Theory. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Wilson, F. L. (1983) “Interest groups and politics in Western Europe: The neo-corporatist approach.” Comparative Politics 16: 105–23.Google Scholar
Wilson, G. K. (1982) “Why is there no corporatism in the United States?” in Lehmbruch, G. and Schmitter, P. C. (eds.) Patterns of Corporatist Policy-Making. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage: 219–36.Google Scholar
Winkler, J. T. (1976) “Corporatism.” Archives européennes de sociologie 17: 100–136.Google Scholar
Winkler, J. T. (1977) “The coming corporatism,” in Skidelsky, R. (ed.) The End of the Keynesian Era. New York: Holmes and Meier: 78–87.Google Scholar
Wolfe, A. (1977) The Limits of Legitimacy: Political Contradictions of Contemporary Capitalism. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Zeigler, H. (1988) Pluralism, Corporatism, and Confucianism: Political Association and Conflict Resolution in the United States, Europe, and Taiwan. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Zeitlin, J. (1985) “Shop floor bargaining and the state: A contradictory relationship,” in Tolliday, S. and Zeitlin, J. (eds.) Shop Floor Bargaining and the State: Historical and Comparative Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 1–45.Google Scholar