Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T00:27:35.178Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Command Decisions

The Conquest of Mexico and the Friedman-Savage Utility Function

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 January 2016

Scott Martin
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The interaction of Spanish and indigenous peoples during the conquest of Mexico yielded a wide variety of actions and decisions. Native groups sometimes battled the Spanish but in other instances cooperated. The Spaniards often attacked when facing overwhelming odds but in other situations retreated with meager gains. Insight into those decisions and actions is gained by looking at human wants and preferences. The Friedman-Savage utility function is applied to specific important events of the conquest of Mexico to clarify the decision making of the participants. An interdisciplinary approach is employed in constructing the expected utility of wealth model, where the maximization of the expected utility of wealth and movement between socioeconomic classes is critically analyzed. Evidence from the Juan de Grijalva expedition, interactions with coastal villages, Hernán Cortés's approach to Tenochtitlan, and the Tlaxcalan decision to ally with the Spaniards are used to clearly illustrate the relationship between the utility of wealth and decision making. Looking through the lens of the Friedman-Savage utility function at events up to Cortés's meeting with Moteucçoma, it is clear that the utility of wealth and the unprecedented opportunities to move to a new socioeconomic class were strong factors in the decision making of the participants.

Type
Articles
Information
Social Science History , Volume 34 , Issue 4 , Winter 2010 , pp. 499 - 522
Copyright
Copyright © Social Science History Association 2010 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Acosta, José de (2002) Natural and Moral History of the Indies, ed. Mangan, Jane E., trans. Lópes-Morillas, Frances M.. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Ixtlilixóchitl, Alva, de, Fernando (1969) Ally of Cortés: Account 13, of the Coming of the Spaniards and the Beginning of the Evangelical Law, trans. Ballentine, Douglass K.. El Paso: Texas Western Press.Google Scholar
Asch, Peter, and Quandt, Richard E. (1990) “Risk love.” Journal of Economic Education 21: 422–26.Google Scholar
Becker, Gary S. (1976) The Economic Approach to Human Behavior. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Boadway, Robin W., and Wildasin, David E. (1984) Public Sector Economics. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Cortés, Hernán (1972) Letters from Mexico, ed. and trans. Padgen, A. R.. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Díaz, Bernal (1963) The Conquest of New Spain, trans. Cohen, J. M.. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
Durán, Diego (1964) The Aztecs: The History of the Indies of New Spain, trans. Heyden, Doris and Horcasitas, Fernando. New York: Orion.Google Scholar
Fleming, J. S. (1969) “The utility of wealth and the utility of windfalls.” Review of Economic Studies 36: 55–66.Google Scholar
Friedman, Milton, and Savage, L. J. (1948) “The utility analysis of choices involving risk.” Journal of Political Economy 56: 279–304.Google Scholar
Friedman, Milton, and Savage, L. J. (1952) “The expected-utility hypothesis and the measurability of utility.” Journal of Political Economy 60: 463–74.Google Scholar
Fuentes, Patricia de, ed. and trans. (1963) The Conquistadors: First-Person Accounts of the Conquest of Mexico. New York: Orion.Google Scholar
Latane, Henry Allen (1959) “Criteria for choice among risky ventures.” Journal of Political Economy 67: 144–55.Google Scholar
Lockhart, James, ed. and trans. (2004) We People Here: Nahuatl Accounts of the Conquest of Mexico. Eugene, OR: Wipf and Stock.Google Scholar
López de Gómara, Francisco (1964) Cortés: The Life of the Conqueror by His Secretary, ed. and trans. Simpson, Lesley Byrd. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl, and Engels, Frederick (1948) The Communist Manifesto. New York: International.Google Scholar
Mosteller, Frederick, and Nogee, Philip (1951) “An experimental measurement of utility.” Journal of Political Economy 59: 371–404.Google Scholar
Motolinía, Toribio (1951) Motolinía’s History of the Indians of New Spain, trans. Steck, Francis Borgia. Washington, DC: Academy of American Franciscan History.Google Scholar
Parry, John H., and Keith, Robert G. (1984) New Iberian World: A Documentary History of the Discovery and Settlement of Latin America to the Early Seventeenth Century, vols. 1 and 3. New York: Times Books.Google Scholar
Pryor, Frederic L. (1976) “The Friedman-Savage utility function in cross-cultural perspective.” Journal of Political Economy 84: 821–34.Google Scholar
Wagner, Henry R. (1929) “Three accounts of the expedition of Fernando Cortés, printed in Germany between 1520 and 1522.” Hispanic American Historical Review 9: 176–212.Google Scholar
Weitzman, Martin (1965) “Utility analysis and group behavior: An empirical study.” Journal of Political Economy 73: 18–26.Google Scholar
Woroch, Glenn (2007) “Preferences and utility.” iPod lecture delivered in Economics 100A, University of California, Berkeley, spring.Google Scholar
Wright, John R., and Goldberg, Arthur S. (1985) “Risk and uncertainty as factors in the durability of political coalitions.” American Political Science Review 79: 704–18.Google Scholar