Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T09:52:54.369Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Colonial American Paper Money and the Quantity Theory of Money: An Extension

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 November 2018

Abstract

The quantity theory of money is applied to the paper money regimes of seven of the nine British North American colonies south of New England. Individual colonies, and regional groupings of contiguous colonies treated as one monetary unit, are tested. Little to no statistical relationship, and little to no magnitude of influence, between the quantities of paper money in circulation and prices are found. The quantity theory of money does not explain the value and performance of colonial paper monies well. This is a general and widespread result, and not a rare and isolated phenomenon.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© Social Science History Association, 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

I gratefully acknowledge research assistance by Cory Cutsail, Hong Guo, Zhuo Liu, and Changqing Mu, and editorial assistance by Tracy McQueen.

References

Achen, Christopher H. (2000) “Why lagged dependent variables can suppress the explanatory power of other independent variables.” Working paper, Department of Political Science, University of Michigan.Google Scholar
Baxter, William T. (1965) The House of Hancock: Business in Boston, 1724–1775. New York: Russell and Russell.Google Scholar
Bezanson, Anne, Gray, Robert D., and Hussey, Miriam (1935) Prices in Colonial Pennsylvania. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Boorman, John T., and Havrilesky, Thomas M. (1972) Money Supply, Money Demand, and Macroeconomic Models. Northbrook, IL: AHM Publishing.Google Scholar
Bordo, Michael D. (1987) “Equation of exchange,” in John Eatwell, Murray Milgate, and Peter Newman (eds.) The New Palgrave: A Dictionary of Economics. Vol. 2. Macmillan, London: 175177.Google Scholar
Brock, Leslie V. (1975) The Currency of the American Colonies, 1700–1764. New York: Arno.Google Scholar
Brock, Leslie V. (1992) “The colonial currency, prices, and exchange rates.” Essays in History 34: 70132.Google Scholar
“Callister Papers.” Unpublished manuscript. Baltimore, MD: Maryland Diocesan Archives of the Protestant Episcopal Church.Google Scholar
Carter, Susan B., Gartner, Scott Sigmund, Haines, Michael R., Olmstead, Alan L., Sutch, Richard, and Wright, Gavin, eds. (2006) Historical Statistics of the United States Earliest Times to the Present Millennial Edition. Vol. 5. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Celia, James, and Grubb, Farley (2016) “Non-legal-tender paper money: The structure and performance of Maryland’s bills of credit, 1767–1775.” Economic History Review 69 (4): 11321156.Google Scholar
Clemens, Paul G. E. (1980) The Atlantic Economy and Colonial Maryland’s Eastern Shore. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Cole, Arthur Harrison (1938) Wholesale Commodity Prices in the United States, 17001861. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Davis, Andrew McFarland, ed. (1964) Colonial Currency Reprints, 1682–1751. 4 vols. New York: Augustus M. Kelley.Google Scholar
Eatwell, John, Milgate, Murray, and Newman, Peter, eds. (1989) The New Palgrave: Money. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Egnal, Marc (1998) New World Economies: The Growth of the Thirteen Colonies and Early Canada. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ernst, Joseph Albert (1973) Money and Politics in America, 1755–1775. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Fisher, Irving (1912) The Purchasing Power of Money. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Friedman, Milton, and Schwartz, Anna Jacobson (1963) A Monetary History of the United States, 1867–1960. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Grubb, Farley (2001) “Social science versus social rhetoric: Methodology and the Pacific labor trade to Queensland, Australia.” Historical Methods 34 (1): 536.Google Scholar
Grubb, Farley (2003) “Creating the US-dollar currency union, 1748–1811: A quest for monetary stability or a usurpation of state sovereignty for personal gain?” American Economic Review 93 (5): 17781798.Google Scholar
Grubb, Farley (2004) “The circulating medium of exchange in colonial Pennsylvania, 1729–1775: New estimates of monetary composition, performance, and economic growth.” Explorations in Economic History 41 (4): 329360.Google Scholar
Grubb, Farley (2005a) “State ‘currencies’ and the transition to the US dollar: Reply—including a new view from Canada.” American Economic Review 95 (4): 13411348.Google Scholar
Grubb, Farley (2005b) “Two theories of money reconciled: The colonial puzzle revisited with new evidence.” National Bureau of Economic Research, Working Paper #11784. www.nber.org/papers/w11784 (accessed November 15, 2018).Google Scholar
Grubb, Farley (2006a) “Theory, evidence, and belief—The colonial money puzzle revisited: Reply to Michener and Wright.” Econ Journal Watch 3 (1): 4572.Google Scholar
Grubb, Farley (2006b) “Benjamin Franklin and colonial money: A reply to Michener and Wright—yet again.” Econ Journal Watch 3 (3): 484510.Google Scholar
Grubb, Farley (2010) “Testing for the economic impact of the US Constitution: Purchasing power parity across the colonies versus across the states, 1748–1811.” Journal of Economic History 70 (1): 118145.Google Scholar
Grubb, Farley (2011) German Immigration and Servitude in America, 1709–1920. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Grubb, Farley (2012) “Chronic specie scarcity and efficient barter: The problem of maintaining an outside money supply in British colonial America.” National Bureau of Economic Research, Working Paper #18099. www.nber.org/papers/w18099 (accessed November 15, 2018).Google Scholar
Grubb, Farley (2015) “Colonial New Jersey’s paper money regime, 1709–75: A forensic accounting reconstruction of the data.” Historical Methods 48 (1): 1334.Google Scholar
Grubb, Farley (2016a) “Is paper money just paper money? Experimentation and variation in the paper monies issued by the American colonies from 1690 to 1775.” Research in Economic History 32: 147224.Google Scholar
Grubb, Farley (2016b) “Colonial New Jersey paper money, 1709–1775: Value decomposition and performance.” Journal of Economic History 76 (4): 12161232.Google Scholar
Grubb, Farley (2016c) “Colonial Virginia’s paper money regime, 1755–1774: Value decomposition and performance.” National Bureau of Economic Research, Working Paper #21881. www.nber.org/papers/w21881 (accessed November 15, 2018).Google Scholar
Grubb, Farley (2017) “Colonial Virginia’s paper money regime, 1755–1774: A forensic accounting reconstruction of the data.” Historical Methods 50 (2): 96112.Google Scholar
Hammond, Bray (1991) Banks and Politics in America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Hanson, John R. II (1979) “Money in the colonial American economy: An extension.” Economic Inquiry 17 (1): 281286.Google Scholar
Labaree, Leonard W., ed. (1968–70) The Papers of Benjamin Franklin. Vols. 12–14. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Lucas, Robert E. Jr. (1980) “Two illustrations of the quantity theory of money.” American Economic Review 70 (5): 10051014.Google Scholar
Maddala, G. S. (1977) Econometrics. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Mancall, Peter C., and Weiss, Thomas (1999) “Was growth likely in colonial British North America?” Journal of Economic History 59 (1): 1740.Google Scholar
Mankiw, N. Gregory (2010) Macroeconomics, 7th ed. New York: Worth Publishers.Google Scholar
McCallum, Bennett T. (1992) “Money and prices in colonial America: A new test of competing theories.” Journal of Political Economy 100 (1): 142161.Google Scholar
McCusker, John J. (1978) Money and Exchange in Europe and America, 1600–1775. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
McCusker, John J., and Menard, Russell R. (1985) The Economy of British America, 1607–1789. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Michener, Ronald W. (1987) “Fixed exchange rates and the quantity theory in colonial America.” Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy 27: 233308.Google Scholar
Michener, Ronald W. (1988) “Backing theories and currencies of eighteenth-century America: A comment.” Journal of Economic History 48 (3): 682692.Google Scholar
Michener, Ronald W. (2015) “Redemption theories and the value of American colonial paper money.” Financial History Review 22 (3): 315335.Google Scholar
Michener, Ronald W., and Wright, Robert E. (2005) “State ‘currencies’ and the transition to the US dollar: Clarifying some confusions.” American Economic Review 95 (3): 682703.Google Scholar
Michener, Ronald W., and Wright, Robert E. (2006a) “Miscounting money of colonial America.” Econ Journal Watch 3 (1): 444.Google Scholar
Michener, Ronald W., and Wright, Robert E. (2006b) “Farley Grubb’s noisy evasions on colonial money: A rejoinder.” Econ Journal Watch 3 (2): 251274.Google Scholar
Newman, Eric P. (2008) The Early Paper Money of America, 5th ed. Iola, WI: Krause Publications.Google Scholar
Officer, Lawrence H. (2005) “The quantity theory in New England, 1703–1749: New data to analyze an old question.” Explorations in Economic History 42 (1): 101121.Google Scholar
Pindyck, Robert S., and Rubinfeld, Daniel L. (1998) Econometric Models and Economic Forecasts, 4th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Rockoff, Hugh (1971) “Money, prices and banks in the Jacksonian era,” in Robert William Fogel and Stanley L. Engerman (eds.) The Reinterpretation of American Economic History. New York: Harper and Row: 448458.Google Scholar
Rousseau, Peter L. (2006) “A common currency: Early US monetary policy and the transition to the dollar.” Financial History Review 13 (1): 97122.Google Scholar
Rousseau, Peter L. (2007) “Backing, the quantity theory, and the transition to the US dollar, 1723–1850.” American Economics Review 97 (2): 266270.Google Scholar
Sargent, Thomas J. (1982) “The end of four big inflations,” in Robert Hall (ed.) Inflation: Causes and Effects. Chicago: University of Chicago: 4198.Google Scholar
Smith, Bruce D. (1985a) “Some colonial evidence on two theories of money: Maryland and the Carolinas.” Journal of Political Economy 93 (6): 11781211.Google Scholar
Smith, Bruce D. (1985b) “American colonial monetary regimes: The failure of the quantity theory of money and some evidence in favor of an alternative view.” Canadian Journal of Economics 18 (3): 531565.Google Scholar
Smith, Bruce D. (1988) “The relationship between money and prices: Some historical evidence reconsidered.” Quarterly Review, Federal Reverse Bank of Minneapolis 12 (3): 1832.Google Scholar
Schumpeter, Elizabeth Boody (1938) “English prices and public finance, 1660–1822.” Review of Economics and Statistics 20 (1): 2137.Google Scholar
Wallace, Neil (1981) “A Modigliana-Miller theorem for open market operations,” American Economic Review 71 (3): 267274.Google Scholar
West, Robert Craig (1978) “Money in the colonial American economy.” Economic Inquiry 16 (1): 115.Google Scholar
Wicker, Elmus (1985) “Colonial monetary standards contrasted: Evidence from the Seven Years’ War.” Journal of Economic History 45 (4): 869884.Google Scholar
“William Fitzhugh ledgers, 1761–1774.” Unpublished manuscript #1831. Baltimore, MD: Maryland Historical Society.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Grubb supplementary material

Appendix Tables 1-2

Download Grubb supplementary material(File)
File 37.7 KB