No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 04 January 2016
In his 1978 essay in this journal, Robert E. Gallman praised but also criticized my work on the “egalitarian myth,” arguing that it had not in fact “dealt a death blow to the ‘egalitarian hypothesis’“ (1978:194). In my response the following year, I tried to show that his criticism was based in large part on a misreading of what I had written, attributing to me “statements I had never made and viewpoints I do not hold.” He thus had created “an elaborate model to refute a point that I had not made” (1979a: 208). Although I argued that his overall criticism was invalid, primarily because it was not based on “germane historical evidence,” I closed by praising the “admirably reasoned spirit that infuses Professor Gallman’s essay,” praise I publicly repeated in the American Historical Review (1979a: 224, 1980b: 1163).
This concludes the debate which began with Robert E. Gallman’s “Professor Pessen on the ‘Egalitarian Myth’” (vol. 2, no. 2). Edward Pessen’s response, “On a Recent Cliometric Attempt to Resurrect the Myth of Antebellum Egalitarianism” (vol. 3 no. 2), was answered by Professor Gallman’s “The ‘Egalitarian Myth’ Once Again” (vol. 5 no. 2). Professor Pessen has the last say according to the journal’s policy regarding debates (only two statements by each member of the debate).