Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T11:47:23.841Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Associated Municipalities

Collective Action and the Formation of State Leagues of Cities

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 January 2016

Bertram Johnson
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Students of federalism in the United States and elsewhere have long been fascinated by the relationships between lower and higher levels of government. State municipal leagues are one important, yet understudied, means by which cities interact with states in the United States. I examine the history of these municipal leagues, arguing that the timing of their formation in U.S. states was in part dependent on state restrictions on special legislation and in part due to the efforts of nationwide networks of policy entrepreneurs. Drawing on scholarly literatures on collective action and associational networks, I develop and test an account of how state municipal leagues formed and how they spread.

Type
Articles
Information
Social Science History , Volume 29 , Issue 4 , winter 2005 , pp. 549 - 574
Copyright
Copyright © Social Science History Association 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allard, Scott, Burns, Nancy, and Gamm, Gerald (1998) “Representing urban interests: The local politics of state legislatures.” Studies in American Political Development 12: 267–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, George A. (1957) The Michigan Municipal League: An Analysis of Policies and Services. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Institute of Public Administration.Google Scholar
Berman, David R. (2003) Local Government and the States: Autonomy, Politics, and Policy. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
Bingham, Herbert J. (1986) Municipal Politics and Power:Tennessee Municipal League in Action. Nashville, TN: Municipal Press.Google Scholar
Blossfeld, Hans-Peter, Hamerle, Alfred, and Mayer, Karl Ulrich (1989) Event History Analysis: Statistical Theory and Applications in the Social Sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Box-Steffensmeier, Janet M., and Jones, Bradford S. (1997) “Time is of the essence: Event history models in political science.” American Journal of Political Science 41: 1414–61.Google Scholar
Burns, Nancy, and Gamm, Gerald (1997) “Creatures of the state: State politics and local government, 1871–1921.” Urban Affairs Review 33: 59–96.Google Scholar
Burns, Nancy, and Gamm, Gerald (1999) “The politics of cooperation: New York City, New York State, 1921–1981.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Atlanta, September 2–5.Google Scholar
Camissa, Anne Marie (1995) Governments as Interest Groups: Intergovernmental Lobbying and the Federal System. Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
Cleves, Mario A., Gould, William W., and Gutierrez, Roberto G. (2002) An Introduction to Survival Analysis Using Stata. College Station, TX: Stata.Google Scholar
Crowley, Jocelyn Elise, and Skocpol, Theda (2001) “The rush to organize: Explaining associational formation in the United States, 1860s–1920s.” American Journal of Political Science 45: 813–29.Google Scholar
Friedman, Lawrence M. (1985) A History of American Law. 2nd ed. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Gamm, Gerald, and Putnam, Robert D. (1999) “The growth of voluntary associations in America, 1840–1940.” Journal of Interdisciplinary History 29: 511–57.Google Scholar
Garman, Christopher, Haggard, Stephan, and Willis, Eliza (2001) “Fiscal decentralization: A political theory with Latin American cases.” World Politics 53: 205–36.Google Scholar
Gaus, John M., and White, Leonard D. (1934) “Public administration in the United States in 1933.” American Political Science Review 28: 443–56.Google Scholar
Ham, Clifford W. (1937) “State leagues of municipalities and the American Municipal Association: An experiment in cooperation among municipal officials.” American Political Science Review 31: 1132–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, Kenneth T. (1985) Crabgrass Frontier: The Suburbanization of the United States. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Janosik, G.Edward (1955) “Suburban balance of power.” American Quarterly 7: 123–41.Google Scholar
Jones, Donald L. (1999) State Municipal Leagues: The First Hundred Years. Washington, DC: National League of Cities.Google Scholar
Krane, Dale, Rigos, Platon N., and Hill, Melvin B. Jr., eds. (2001) Home Rule in America: A Fifty-State Handbook. Washington, DC: CQ.Google Scholar
League of American Municipalities (LAM) (1911) Proceedings of the 15th Annual Convention Held in Atlanta, Georgia, October 4th, 5th, and 6th, 1911. Des Moines, IA: LAM.Google Scholar
League of California Cities (1948) “Fifty years of municipal cooperation in California: The League of California Cities observes its golden anniversary.” Western City, September, 28–36.Google Scholar
Logan, John R., and Molotch, Harvey L. (1987) Urban Fortunes: The Political Economy of Place. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Mayhew, David R. (1986) Placing Parties in American Politics: Organization, Electoral Settings, and Government Activity in the Twentieth Century. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
McBain, Howard Lee (1916) The Law and the Practice of Municipal Home Rule. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
National Municipal League (NML) (1910) Program for the Sixteenth Annual Meeting of the National Municipal League and Eighteenth National Conference for Good City Government. Buffalo, NY: NML.Google Scholar
North, Douglass (1990) Institutions, Institutional Change, and Economic Performance. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Oates, Wallace E. (1972) Fiscal Federalism. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Olson, Mancur (1965) The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Ordeshook, Peter C., and Shvetsova, Olga (1997) “Federalism and constitutional design.” Journal of Democracy 8: 27–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peterson, Paul E. (1981) City Limits. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Pierson, Paul (1993) “When effect becomes cause: Policy feedback and political change.” World Politics 45: 595–628.Google Scholar
Riordan, William L. (1963 [1905]) Plunkitt of Tammany Hall: A Series of Very Plain Talks on Very Practical Politics. New York: E. P. Dutton.Google Scholar
Rodden, Jonathan, and Wibbels, Erik (2002) “Beyond the fiction of federalism: Macroeconomic management in multitiered systems.” World Politics 54: 494–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saez, Lawrence (1999) “India’s economic liberalization, interjurisdictional competition, and development.” Contemporary South Asia 8: 323–45.Google Scholar
Saiegh, Sebastian M., and Tommasi, Mariano (1999) “Why is Argentina’s fiscal federalism so inefficient? Entering the labyrinth.” Journal of Applied Economics 2: 169–209.Google Scholar
Skocpol, Theda (1999) “How Americans became civic,” in Skocpol, Theda, and Fiorina, Morris P. (eds.) Civic Engagement in American Democracy. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press and the Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Skocpol, Theda (2003) Diminished Democracy: From Membership to Management in American Civic Life. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar
Skocpol, Theda, Ganz, Marshall, and Munson, Ziad (2000) “A nation of organizers: The institutional origins of civic voluntarism in the United States.” American Political Science Review 94: 527–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teaford, Jon C. (1979) “Special legislation and the cities, 1865–1900.” American Journal of Legal History 23: 189–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tiebout, Charles (1956) “A pure theory of local expenditures.” Journal of Political Economy 64: 416–24.Google Scholar
Updegraff, Winston R. (1973) “75 years: League of California Cities.” Western City, September, 26–59.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Commerce and Labor, Bureau of the Census (1906) Twelfth Census of the United States, 1900. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Weingast, Barry R. (1995) “The economic role of political institutions: Market preserving federalism and economic development.” Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 11: 1–31.Google Scholar
Wilson, James Q. (1989) Bureaucracy: What Government Agencies Do and Why They Do It. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar