Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T01:51:21.106Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Size and Duration of Empires: Growth-Decline Curves, 600 B.C. to 600 A.D.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 January 2016

Rein Taagepera
Rein Taagepera*
Affiliation:
University of California, Irvine
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The first known attempt to explain the duration and supersession of dynasties through calculations was made in the first century B.C. by Tsou Yen or his disciples in China (Eberhard, 1950: 60). The calculations were astrological. The rulers’ response was inimical. Maybe this is why no further attempts were made during the next two thousand years, in spite of astrology continuing to flourish. The objectives of the present study are somewhat related to those of Tsou Yen although the calculations avoid astrology; whether that helps to avoid the opprobrium heaped on Tsou Yen’s school remains to be seen. As we tackle the period during which this school of thought was born and subsequently crushed, it is only proper to recall the memory of these spiritual ancestors.

Type
Research Article
Information
Social Science History , Volume 3 , Issue 3-4 , 1979 , pp. 115 - 138
Copyright
Copyright © Social Science History Association 1979

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Davies, C. C. (1949) An Historical Atlas of the Indian Peninsula. Oxford: At the University Press.Google Scholar
Dunbar, G. (1937) Geschichte Indiens. Munchen: Oldenbourg.Google Scholar
Eberhard, W. (1950) A History of China. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Encyclopedia Britannica (1968).Google Scholar
Engel, J. [ed.] (1953) Grosser Historische Weltatlas, Vol. 1. Munchen: Bayerische Schulbuch-Verlag.Google Scholar
Haack (1973) Atlas zur Geschichte, Vol. 1. Gotha: VEB Hermann Haack.Google Scholar
Hammond, Inc. (1968) Hammond Historical Atlas. Maplewood, N.J. Google Scholar
Hazard, H. W. (1954) Atlas of Islamic History. Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Herrmann, A. (1966) An Historical Atlas of China. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
Holsti (1967) International Politics. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Kinder, H. and Hilgemann, W. (1964) dtv-Atlas zur Weltgeschichte, Vol. 1. Munchen: Deutscher Taschenbuch Verlag.Google Scholar
Michaely, M. (1962) Concentration in International Trade. Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar
Muir, R. (1961) Muir’s Atlas of Ancient and Classical History. New York: Barnes&Noble.Google Scholar
Otava (1970) Iso Fokus. Helsinki, Finland: Otava.Google Scholar
Palmer, R. R. (1957) Atlas of World History. New York: Rand McNlly.Google Scholar
Putzger, F. W. (1961) Historischer Weltatlas. Bielefeld: Velhagen & Klasing.Google Scholar
Roolvink, R. (1957) Historical Atlas of the Muslim People. Cambridge: Harvard Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Sellman, R. R. (1954) An Outline Atlas of Eastern History. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Shepherd, W. R. (1956) Shepherd’s Historical Atlas. New York: Barnes & Noble.Google Scholar
Stier, H. E. et al. (1956 & 1963) Westermann’s Atlas der Weltgeschichte. Berlin: Westermann.Google Scholar
Taagepera, R. (1978a) “Size and duration of empires: systematics of size.” Social Sci. Research 7: 108–127.Google Scholar
Taagepera, R. (1978b) “Size and duration of empires: growth-decline curves, 3000 to 600 B.C.” Social Sci. Research 7: 180–196.Google Scholar
Taagepera, R. (1972) “A model for growth and decay of biological and social systems.” Social Sciences Working Papers, Study of Man Series. Irvine: University of California.Google Scholar
Taagepera, R. (1968) “Growth curves of empires.” General Systems 13: 171–175.Google Scholar