Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T00:37:21.709Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Short and the Tall: Comparing Stature and Socioeconomic Status for Male Prison and Military Populations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 August 2020

Kris Inwood Open the ORCID record for Kris Inwood [Opens in a new window] ,
Rebecca Kippen Open the ORCID record for Rebecca Kippen [Opens in a new window] ,
Hamish Maxwell-Stewart Open the ORCID record for Hamish Maxwell-Stewart [Opens in a new window]  and
Richard Steckel
Kris Inwood
Affiliation:
University of Guelph
Rebecca Kippen
Affiliation:
Monash University
Hamish Maxwell-Stewart*
Affiliation:
University of Tasmania
Richard Steckel
Affiliation:
Ohio State University
*
*Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Over the last four decades, historians and social scientists have become increasingly interested in the way in which information about stature might be used to explore the impact of environmental factors on the physical growth and well-being of past populations. A particular problem encountered by many researchers is that height data is only available for selected populations, typically military recruits or those admitted to correctional institutions. Evidence from Australian military and prison records demonstrate how the two social groups, soldiers and prisoners, differed from each other and from the wider population in terms of age, birthplace, occupation, and stature. Different patterns of observable characteristics conceal additional differences in intergenerational experience. We trace male prisoners and soldiers born between 1870 and 1899 in Tasmania to their birth records and thence to the marriages of their parents. This allows us to contrast social and occupational change from father to son for both prisoners and soldiers. We conclude that evidence arising from these institutionalized populations can be used to estimate wider societal trends, although caution needs to be exercised.

Type
Special Issue Article
Information
Social Science History , Volume 44 , Special Issue 3: Selection Bias and Social Science History , Fall 2020 , pp. 463 - 483
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Social Science History Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alter, G., Neven, M., and Oris, M. (2004) “Stature in transition: A micro-level study from nineteenth-century Belgium.” Social Science History (28): 231–47.Google Scholar
Ashford, J. B., and LeCroy, C. W. (2009) Human Behaviour in the Social Environment: A Multidimensional Perspective. Belmont, CA: Brooks Cole.Google Scholar
Beekink, E., and Kok, J. (2017) “Temporary and lasting effects of childhood deprivation on male stature: Late adolescent stature and catch-up growth in Woerden (The Netherlands) in the first half of the nineteenth century.” The History of the Family (22): 196–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Besemer, S., Farrington, D., and Bijleveld, C. (2017) “Labelling and intergenerational transmission of crime: The interaction between criminal justice intervention and a convicted parent.” PLOS ONE (12): e0172419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blainey, G. (1954) The Peaks of Lyell. Melbourne: Melbourne University Press.Google Scholar
Bodenhorn, H., Guinnane, T., and Mroz, T. (2017) “Sample-selection biases and the industrialization puzzle.” The Journal of Economic History (77): 171–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bodenhorn, H., Moehling, C., and Price, G. N. (2012) “Short criminals, stature and crime in early America.” Journal of Law and Economics (55): 392–419.Google Scholar
Bozzoli, C., Deaton, A., and Quintana-Domeque, C. (2009) “Adult height and childhood disease.” Demography (46): 647–69.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carson, S. A. (2009) “African-American and white inequality in the nineteenth century American south: A biological comparison.” Journal of Population Economics (22): 739–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cinnirella, F. (2008) “Optimists or pessimists? A reconsideration of nutritional status in Britain, 1740–1.” European Review of Economic History (12): 325–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cranfield, J., and Inwood, K. (2015) “Genes, class or culture? French-English height differences in Canada,” in Baskerville, P. and Inwood, K. (eds.) Lives in Transition: Longitudinal Research from Historical Sources. Montreal and Kingston: McGill-Queens University Press: 231–53.Google Scholar
Damousi, J. (1999) The Labour of Loss: Mourning, Memory and Bereavement in Australia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Depauw, E., and Oxley, D. (2018) “Toddlers, teenagers and terminal heights: The determinants of adult male stature Flanders 1800–76.” Economics History Review (72): 925–52.Google Scholar
Ewert, U. C. (2006) “The biological standard of living on the decline: Episodes from Germany during early industrialisation.” European Review of Economic History (10): 51–88.10.1017/S1361491605001619CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finch, C., and Crimmins, E. (2004) “Inflammatory exposure and historical changes in human life spans.” Science (305): 1736–39.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Floud, R., and Harris, B. (1997) “Health, height and welfare: Britain 1700–1980,” in Steckel, R. H. and Floud, R. (eds.) Health and Welfare during Industrialisation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press: 91–126.Google Scholar
Floud, R., Wachter, K., and Gregory, A. (1993) Height Health and History: Nutritional Status in the United Kingdom, 1750–1980. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fourie, J., Inwood, K., and Marrioti, M. (2020) “Can historical changes in military technology explain the industrial growth puzzle?” Social Science History 44(3): 485–500.Google Scholar
Frank, D.A. (1985) “Biologic risks in ‘nonorganic’ failure to thrive: Diagnostic and therapeutic implications,” in Drotar, D. (ed.) New Directions in Failure to Thrive: Implications for Research and Practice. New York: Plenum: 17–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Godfrey, B. (2014) Crime in England: 1880–1945. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Guthrie, G. J., and Jenkins, S. (2005) “Bertillion files: An untapped source of nineteenth-century human height data.” Journal of Anthropological Research (61): 201–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, B., Floud, R., and Hong, S. C. (2015) “How many calories? Food availability in England and Wales in the 18th and 19th centuries.” Research in Economic History 31: 111–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Higgs, E. (1995) “Occupational censuses and the agricultural workforce in England and Wales in Victorian England.” Economic History Review (48): 702–4.Google Scholar
Inwood, K., Maxwell-Stewart, H., Oxley, D., and Stankovich, J. (2015) “Growing incomes, growing people in nineteenth-century Tasmania.” Australian Economic History Review (55): 187–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katona, P. (2008) “The interaction between nutrition and infection.” Clinical Infectious Disease (46): 1582–88.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
King, P. (1984) “Decision-makers and decision-making in the English criminal law.” The Historical Journal (27): 25–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Komlos, J. (1998) “Shrinking in a growing economy? The mystery of physical stature during the Industrial Revolution.” Journal of Economic History (58): 779–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Komlos, J., and A’Hearn, B. (2019) “Clarifications of a puzzle: The decline in nutritional status at the onset of modern economic growth in the United States.” Journal of Economic History (79): 1129–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
López-Alonso, M. (2007) “Growth with inequality: Living standards in Mexico, 1850–1950.” Journal of Latin American Studies (39): 81–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mansfield, N. (2016) Soldiers as Workers: Class, Employment, Conflict and the Nineteenth Century Military. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maxwell-Stewart, H. (2016) “The state, convicts and longitudinal analysis.” Australian Historical Studies (47): 414–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meredith, D., and Oxley, D. (2014) “Food and fodder: Feeding England, 1700–1900.” Past & Present (222): 163–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mironov, B., and A’Hearn, B. (2008) “Russian living standards under the Tsars: Anthropometric evidence from the Volga.” The Journal of Economic History (68): 900–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mokyr, J., and Ó’Gráda, C. (1994) “The heights of the British and the Irish c. 1800–1815: Evidence from recruits to the East India Company’s army,” in Komlos, J. (ed.) Stature, Living Standards, and Economic Development. Chicago: University of Chicago Press: 39–59.Google Scholar
Mokyr, J., and Ó’Gráda, C. (1996) “Height and health in the United Kingdom 1815–1860: Evidence from the East India Company army.” Explorations in Economic History (33): 141–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Myerly, S. H. (1996) British Military Spectacle from the Napoleonic Wars through the Crimea. London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Nicholas, S., and Shergold, P. R. (1988) “Convicts as workers,” in Nicholas, S. (ed.) Convict Workers: Reinterpreting Australia’s Past. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 68–74.Google Scholar
Pilger, A. (1992) “The other lost generation: Rejected Australian volunteers 1914–18.” Journal of the Australian War Memorial (21): 11–19.Google Scholar
Scholliers, P. (1996) “Real wages and the standard of living in the nineteenth and early-twentieth centuries: Some theoretical and methodological elucidations.” Vierteljahrschrift für Sozial- und Wirtschaftsgeschichte (83): 307–33.Google Scholar
Shlomowitz, R. (2007) “Did the mean height of Australian-born men decline in the late nineteenth century? A comment.” Economics and Human Biology (5): 484–88.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stanley, P. (2010) Bad Characters: Sex, Crime, Mutiny, Murder and the Australian Imperial Force. Sydney: Murdoch/Pier 9.Google Scholar
Steckel, R. H. (1995) “Stature and the standard of living.” Journal of Economic Literature (33): 1903–40.Google Scholar
Steegmann, A. T. (1985) “18th century British military stature: Growth cessation, selective recruiting, secular trends, nutrition at birth, cold and occupation.” Human Biology (57): 82–84.Google ScholarPubMed
Tasmanian Government (1891) The Colony of Tasmania, 1891. Hobart: Tasmania: xxiii–xxxiv.Google Scholar
Unger, A. (1977) “Galbraith turning economics to show biz.” Christian Science Monitor, May 18.Google Scholar
Watamura, S. E. (2009) “Endocrine system,” in Benson, J. B. and Haith, M. M. (eds.) Diseases and Disorders in Infancy and Early Childhood. Oxford: Academic Press: 147–57.Google Scholar
Whitwell, G., Da Souza, C., and Nicholas, S. (1997) “Height, health and economic growth in Australia 1860-1940,” in Steckel, R. H., and Floud, R. (eds.) Health and Welfare during Industrialization. Chicago: University of Chicago: 382.Google Scholar
Williams, L., and Godfrey, B. (2016) “Bringing the prisoner into view: English and Welsh census data and the Victorian prison population.” Australian Historical Studies (47): 398–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zehetmayer, M. (2011) “The continuation of the antebellum puzzle: Stature in the US, 1847–1894.” European Review of Economic History (15): 313–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zimran, A. (2019) “Sample-selection bias and height trends in the nineteenth-century United States.” Journal of Economic History (79): 99–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar