Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T00:06:27.564Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Rereading Skowronek

A Precocious Theory of Institutional Change

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 January 2016

Elisabeth S. Clemens
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Although American Political Development is one of the more sociological corners of political science, for the most part sociologists have not been attuned to its contributions. Even among historical sociologists, the central conversations have been motivated by classic questions about transitions to capitalism and revolution in Europe rather than by puzzles of American exceptionalism.Much of political sociology has focused on individual voting behavior and public opinion; social movements research focuses heavily on the most recent decades in American history. Consequently, a review of the impact of Stephen Skowronek’s Building a New American State within sociology reveals a sharply delimited set of direct influences beyond the research already well known to scholars in American Political Development, largely the work of Theda Skocpol (1992) and her many students and collaborators (e.g., Orloff and Skocpol 1984). A rereading, by contrast, highlights the importance of the book for contemporary discussions of the forms and processes of institutional change.

Type
Roundtable: Twenty Years after Building a New American State
Information
Social Science History , Volume 27 , Issue 3 , Fall 2003 , pp. 443 - 453
Copyright
Copyright © Social Science History Association 2003 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, Julia, Clemens, Elisabeth S., and Orloff, Ann Shola (forthcoming) “Introduction,” in Adams, Clemens, and Orloff, (eds.) Remaking Modernity: Politics, History, and Sociology. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Amenta, Edwin (1998) Bold Relief: Institutional Politics and the Origins of Modern American Social Policy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Amenta, Edwin, and Carruthers, Bruce G. (1988) “The formative years of U.S. social spending policies: Theories of the welfare state and the American states during the Great Depression.” American Sociological Review 53: 661–78.Google Scholar
Amenta, Edwin, Carruthers, Bruce G., and Zylan, Yvonne (1992) “A hero for the aged? The Townsend Movement, the political mediation model, and U.S. old-age policy, 1934–1950.” American Journal of Sociology 98: 308–39.Google Scholar
Babb, Sarah (1996) “‘A true American system of finance’: Frame resonance in the U.S. labor movement, 1866 to 1886.” American Sociological Review 61:1033–52.Google Scholar
Beisel, Nicola (1997) Imperiled Innocents: Anthony Comstock and Family Reproduction in Victorian America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Berk, Gerald (1994) Alternative Tracks: The Constitution of the American Industrial Order, 1865–1917. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Campbell, John L. (1998) “Institutional analysis and the role of ideas in political economy.” Theory and Society 27: 377–409.Google Scholar
Carpenter, Daniel P. (2001) The Forging of Bureaucratic Autonomy: Reputations, Networks, and Policy Innovation in Executive Agencies, 1862–1928. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Clemens, Elisabeth S. (1993) “Organizational repertoires and institutional change: Women’s groups and the transformation of U.S. politics, 1890–1920.” American Journal of Sociology 98: 755–98.Google Scholar
Clemens, Elisabeth S. (1997) The People’s Lobby: Organizational Innovation and the Rise of Interest Group Politics in the United States, 1890–1925. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Clemens, Elisabeth S., and Cook, James M. (1999) “Politics and institutionalism: Explaining durability and change.” Annual Review of Sociology 25: 441–66.Google Scholar
DiMaggio, Paul J. (1988) “Interest and agency in institutional theory,” in Zucker, Lynne G. (ed.) Institutional Patterns and Organizations: Culture and Environment. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.Google Scholar
DiMaggio, Paul J., and Powell, Walter W. (1983) “The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields.” American Sociological Review 48: 147–60.Google Scholar
Dobbin, Frank (1992) “The origins of private social insurance: Public policy and fringe benefits in America, 1920–1950.” American Journal of Sociology 97: 1416–50.Google Scholar
Dobbin, Frank (1994) Forging Industrial Policy: The United States, Britain, and France in the Railway Age. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dobbin, Frank, and Dowd, Timothy J. (1997) “How policy shapes competition: Early railroad foundings in Massachusetts.” Administrative Science Quarterly 42: 501–29.Google Scholar
Dunlavy, Colleen A. (1994) Politics and Industrialization: Early Railroads in the United States and Prussia. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Fligstein, Neil (1990) The Transformation of Corporate Control. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hamilton, Gary G., and Sutton, John R. (1989) “The problem of control in the weak state.” Theory and Society 18: 1–46.Google Scholar
Hooks, Gregory (1990) “?From an autonomous to a captured state agency: The decline of the New Deal in agriculture.” American Sociological Review 55: 29–43.Google Scholar
Hooks, Gregory (1993) “The weakness of strong theories: The U.S. state’s dominance of the World War II investment process.” American Sociological Review 58: 37–53.Google Scholar
Jenkins, J. Craig, and Brents, Barbara G. (1989) “Social protest, hegemonic competition, and social reform: A political struggle interpretation of the origins of the American welfare state.” American Sociological Review 54: 891–909.Google Scholar
Lehman, Edward W. (1988) “The theory of the state versus the state of theory.” American Sociological Review 53: 807–23.Google Scholar
McAdam, Doug, McCarthy, John D., and Zald, Mayer N., eds. (1996) Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements: Political Opportunities, Mobilizing Structures, and Cultural Framings. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Meyer, John, and Rowan, Brian (1977) “Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony.” American Journal of Sociology 83: 340–63.Google Scholar
Orloff, Ann Shola, and Skocpol, Theda (1984) “Why not equal protection? Explaining the politics of public social spending in Britain, 1900-1911, and the United States, 1880s–1920.” American Sociological Review 49: 726–50.Google Scholar
Piven, Frances Fox, and Cloward, Richard A. (1979 [1977]) Poor People’s Movements: Why They Succeed, How They Fail. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
Powell, Walter W., and DiMaggio, Paul J. (1991) The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Quadagno, Jill (1988) The Transformation of Old Age Security: Class and Politics in the American Welfare State. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Rao, Hayagreeva, Morrill, Calvin, and Zald, Mayer N. (2000) “Power plays: How social movements and collective action create new organizational forms.” Research in Organizational Behavior 22: 239–82.Google Scholar
Roy, William G. (1997) Socializing Capital: The Rise of the Large Industrial Corporation in America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Rubinson, Richard (1986) “Class formation, politics, and institutions: Schooling in the United States.” American Journal of Sociology 92: 519–48.Google Scholar
Schneiberg, Marc, and Bartley, Tim (2001) “Regulating American industries: Markets, politics, and the institutional determinants of fire insurance regulation.” American Journal of Sociology 107: 101–46.Google Scholar
Skocpol, Theda (1980) “Political response to capitalist crisis: Neo-Marxist theories of the state and the case of the New Deal.” Politics and Society 10: 155–201.Google Scholar
Skocpol, Theda (1992) Protecting Soldiers and Mothers: The Political Origins of Social Policy in the United States. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Skowronek, Stephen (1982) Building a New American State: The Expansion of National Administrative Capacities, 1877–1920. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Skowronek, Stephen (1993) The Politics Presidents Make: Leadership from John Adams to George Bush. Cambridge.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Steffens, Lincoln (1954 [1904]) The Shame of the Cities. New York: Hill and Wang.Google Scholar
Stegner, Wallace (1992 [1954]) Beyond the Hundredth Meridian: John Wesley Powell and the Second Opening of the West. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
Stinchcombe, Arthur L. (1978) Theoretical Methods in Social History. New York: Academic.Google Scholar
Stinchcombe, Arthur L. (2001) When Formality Works: Authority and Abstraction in Law and Organizations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Thelen, Kathleen (2003) “How institutions evolve: Insights from Comparative Historical Analysis,” in Mahoney, James and Rueschemeyer, Dietrich (eds.) Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Thelen, Kathleen, and Steinmo, Sven (1992) “Historical institutionalism in comparative politics,” in Steinmo, Thelen, and Longstreth, Frank (eds.) Structuring Politics: Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Analysis. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Voss, Kim (1994) The Making of American Exceptionalism: The Knights of Labor and Class Formation in the Nineteenth Century. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar