No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
The Persistence of the Health Insurance Dilemma
An Introduction
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 04 January 2016
Abstract
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Articles
- Information
- Social Science History , Volume 30 , Issue 4: The Persistence of the Health Insurance Dilemma , Winter 2006 , pp. 465 - 477
- Copyright
- Copyright © Social Science History Association 2006
References
Baldwin, Peter (1990) The Politics of Social Solidarity: Class Bases of the European Welfare State, 1875–1975. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Barker, D. J. P., ed. (1992) Fetal and Infant Origins of Adult Disease: Papers. London: British Medical Journal.Google Scholar
Beidelman, Edward E. (1919) Report of the Health Insurance Commission of Pennsylvania. Harrisburg, PA: Kuhn.Google Scholar
Beito, David (2000) From Mutual Aid to the Welfare State: Fraternal Societies and Social Services, 1890–1967. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Beye, William (1919) Report of the Health Insurance Commission of the State of Illinois, May 1, 1919. Springfield: Illinois State Journal.Google Scholar
Cameron, A. C., Trivedi, P. K., Milne, F., and Piggott, J. (1988) “A microeconometric model of the demand for health care and health insurance in Australia.” Review of Economic Studies
55: 85–106.Google Scholar
Cammack, E. E. (1921) “Premiums and reserves for non-cancellable accident and health policies.” Proceedings of the Casualty Actuarial Society
7: 267–301.Google Scholar
Case, Anne, Fertig, Angela, and Paxson, Christina (2005) “The lasting impact of childhood health and circumstance.” Journal of Health Economics
24: 365–89.Google Scholar
Derickson, Alan (2005) Health Security for All: Dreams of Universal Health Care in America. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Emery, George, and Emery, J. C. Herbert (1999) A Young Man's Benefit: The Independent Order of Odd Fellows and Sickness Insurance in the United States and Canada, 1860–1920. Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press.Google Scholar
Emery, J. C. Herbert (1996) “Risky business? Nonactuarial pricing practices and the financial viability of fraternal sickness insurers.” Explorations in Economic History
33: 195–226.Google Scholar
Gilleskie, Donna (1998) “A dynamic stochastic model of medical care use and work absence.” Econometrica
66: 1–45.Google Scholar
Gordon, Colin (2003) Dead on Arrival: The Politics of Health Care in Twentieth-Century America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Guaraglia, Alessandra, and Rossi, Mariacristina (2004) “Private medical insurance and saving: Evidence from the British Household Panel Survey.” Journal of Health Economics
23: 761–83.Google Scholar
Hoffman, Beatrix (2001) The Wages of Sickness: The Politics of Health Insurance in Progressive America. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Hye Kyung Son, Annette (2001) “Taiwan's path to national health insurance, 1950–1995.” International Journal of Social Welfare
10: 45–53.Google Scholar
Jenney, Charles A. (1895) Report on Insurance Business in the United States at the Eleventh Census, 1890. Part 2, Life Insurance. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Kaufman, Jason (2002) For the Common Good? American Civic Life and the Golden Age of Fraternity. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Klein, Jennifer (2003) For All These Rights: Business, Labor, and the Shaping of America's Public-Private Welfare State. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Levine, Daniel (1988) Poverty and Society: The Growth of the American Welfare State in International Comparison. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Lubove, Roy (1986) The Struggle for Social Security, 1900–1935. 2nd ed. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Allan (1991) The Divided Path: German Influence on Social Reform in France after 1870. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Murray, John E. (2005) “Worker absenteeism under voluntary and compulsory sickness insurance: Continental Europe, 1885–1908.” Research in Economic History
23: 181–212.Google Scholar
Murray, John E.(forthcoming) Origins of American Health Insurance: A History of Industrial Sickness Funds. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Neill, Charles Patrick (1911) Twenty-fourth Annual Report of the Commissioner of Labor: Workmen's Insurance and Compensation Systems in Europe. 2 vols. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Numbers, Ronald L. (1978) Almost Persuaded: American Physicians and Compulsory Health Insurance, 1912–1920. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Quadagno, Jill (2005) One Nation, Uninsured: Why the U.S. Has No National Health Insurance. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Riley, James C. (1997) Sick, Not Dead: The Health of British Workingmen during the Mortality Decline. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Rodgers, Daniel (1998) Atlantic Crossings: Social Politics in a Progressive Age. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Rosen, Allison B., Hamel, Mary Beth, Weinstein, Milton C., Cutler, David M., Fendrick, A. Mark, and Vijan, Sandeep (2005) “Cost-effectiveness of full Medicare coverage of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors for beneficiaries with diabetes.” Annals of Internal Medicine
143: 89–99.Google Scholar
Terris, Milton (1944) “An early system of compulsory health insurance in the United States, 1798-1884.” Bulletin of the History of Medicine
15: 433–44.Google Scholar
Thomasson, Melissa A. (2004) “Early evidence of an adverse selection death spiral? The case of Blue Cross and Blue Shield.” Explorations in Economic History
41: 313–28.Google Scholar
Whaples, Robert, and Buffum, David (1991) “Fraternalism, paternalism, the family, and the market: Insurance a century ago.” Social Science History
15: 97–122.Google Scholar