Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T03:43:05.691Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The New Deal, the Deserving Poor, and the First Public Housing Residents in New York City

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 January 2020

Ryan Allen
Affiliation:
The Humphrey School of Public Affairs, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
David Van Riper
Affiliation:
Minnesota Population Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA

Abstract

Between 1934 and the time of the 1940 Census, the US government built and leased 30,151 units of public housing, but we know little about the residents who benefited from this housing. We use a unique methodology that compares addresses of five public housing developments to complete-count data from the 1940 Census to identify residents of public housing in New York City at the time of the census. We compare these residents to the larger pool of residents living in New York City in 1940 who were eligible to apply for the housing to assess how closely housing authorities adhered to the intent of the National Industrial Recovery Act (1933) and the Housing Act of 1937. This comparison produces a picture of whom public housing administrators considered deserving of this public benefit at the dawn of the public housing program in the United States. Results indicate a shift toward serving households with lower incomes over time. All the developments had a consistent preference for households with a “nuclear family” structure, but policies favoring racial segregation and other discretion on the part of housing authorities for tenant selection created distinct populations across housing developments. Households headed by a naturalized citizen were favored over households headed by a native-born citizen in nearly all the public housing projects. This finding suggests a more nuanced understanding of who public housing administrators considered deserving of the first public housing than archival research accounts had previously indicated.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© Social Science History Association, 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Addams, Jane (1990) Twenty Years at Hull-House. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Anbinder, Tyler (2016) City of Dreams: The 400-Year Epic History of Immigrant New York. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.Google Scholar
Barrett, James R. (1992) “Americanization from the bottom up: Immigration and the remaking of the working class in the United States, 1880–1930.The Journal of American History 79 (3): 9961020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bauman, John F. (1994) “Public housing: The dreadful saga of a durable policy.Journal of Planning Literature 8 (4): 347–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bloom, Nicholas Dagen (2008) Public Housing That Worked: New York in the Twentieth Century. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cates, Jerry R. (1983) Insuring Inequality: Administrative Leadership in Social Security, 1935–54. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fairbanks, Robert B. (1988) Making Better Citizens: Housing Reform and the Community Development Strategy in Cincinnati, 1890–1960. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Federal Emergency Administration of Public Works (n.d.) Manual of Tenant Selection Procedure. Washington, DC: Housing Division, Public Works Administration.Google Scholar
Fox, Cybelle (2010) “Three worlds of relief: Race, immigration, and public and private social welfare spending in American cities, 1929.American Journal of Sociology 116 (2): 453502.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Friedman, Lawrence M. (1966) “Public housing and the poor: An overview.” California Law Review 54 (2): 642–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freidman, Lawrence M., and Spector, Michael J. (1965) “Tenement house legislation in Wisconsin: Reform and reaction.The American Journal of Legal History 9 (1): 4163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, Linda (2001) “Who deserves help? Who must provide?The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 577: 1225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanlon, James (2010) “Success by design: HOPE VI, new urbanism, and the neoliberal transformation of public housing in the United States.Environment and Planning A 42 (1): 8098.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunt, D. Bradford (2005) “Was the 1937 US Housing Act a pyrrhic victory?Journal of Planning History 4 (3): 195221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katz, Michael B. (2013) The Undeserving Poor: America’s Enduring Confrontation with Poverty. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Katznelson, Ira (2005) When Affirmative Action Was White: An Untold History of Racial Inequality in Twentieth-Century America. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
Lubove, Roy (1962) The Progressives and the Slums: Tenement House Reform in New York City, 1890–1917. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
Marcuse, Peter (1986) “The beginnings of public housing in New York.Journal of Urban History 12 (4): 353–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mink, Gwendolyn (1995) The Wages of Motherhood: Inequality in the Welfare State, 1917–1942. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Moffitt, Robert A. (2015) “The deserving poor, the family, and the US welfare system.Demography 52 (3): 729–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morse, Stephen P., and Weintraub, Joel D. (2017) “Unified 1940 census ED finder.” https://stevemorse.org/census/unified.html (accessed April 27).Google Scholar
Plunz, Richard (1990) A History of Housing in New York City: Dwelling Type and Social Change in the American Metropolis. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Radford, Gail (1996) Modern Housing for America: Policy Struggles in the New Deal Era. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Radford, Gail (2000) “The federal government and housing during the Great Depression,” in Bauman, John F., Biles, Roger, and Szylvian, Kristin M. (eds.) From Tenements to the Taylor Homes. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press: 102–20.Google Scholar
Riis, Jacob A. (1996 [1890]) How the Other Half Lives: Studies among the Tenements of New York. New York: Bedford Books.Google Scholar
Ruggles, Steven, Genadek, Katie, Goeken, Ronald, Grover, Josiah, and Sobek, Matthew (2017) Integrated Public Use Microdata Series: Version 7.0 [dataset]. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota. https://doi.org/10.18128/D010.V7.0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanborn Map Company (1983) Sanborn Fire Insurance Maps: New York [microform]. Teaneck, NJ: Chadwyck-Healy.Google Scholar
Smith, Janet L. (2006) “Public housing transformation: Evolving national policy,” in Bennett, Larry, Smith, Janet L., and Wright, Patricia A. (eds.) Where Are Poor People to Live? Transforming Public Housing Communities. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe: 1940.Google Scholar
Thomas, June Manning (2018) “Josephine Gomon plans for Detroit’s rehabilitation.Journal of Planning History 17 (2): 97117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
US Census Bureau (2008) “Factfinder for the nation: Availability of census records about individuals.” www.census.gov/history/pdf/cff2.pdf (accessed September 27).Google Scholar
US Department of the Interior (2004) Public Housing in the United States, 1933–1949. Washington, DC: National Park Service.Google Scholar
US Housing Act of 1937 (1937) Pub. L. No. 75-412, 50 Stat. 888.Google Scholar
Vale, Lawrence J. (2000) From the Puritans to the Projects: Public Housing and Public Neighborhoods. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Vale, Lawrence J. (2013) Purging the Poorest: Public Housing and the Design Politics of Twice-Cleared Communities. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vale, Lawrence J., and Freemark, Yonah (2012) “From public housing to public-private housing.Journal of the American Planning Association 78 (4): 379402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Von Hoffman, Alexander (2000) “A study in contradictions: The origins and legacy of the Housing Act of 1949.Housing Policy Debate 11 (2): 299326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar