Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T23:52:01.576Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Miracle Making and the Preservation of Charisma

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 June 2015

Dan Lainer-Vos  and
Paolo Parigi
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article extends Max Weber's theory of the transformation of charisma by exploring the relationships between cults of charismatic miracle workers and the Catholic Church in early modern Europe. We show that, at least in this case, cults of miracle workers were able to preserve their charismatic character even after the death of their leader by securing recognition from the church of their leader as a saint. While the Church in general was concerned over the proliferation of magic, its attitude toward miracle workers in this period was not hostile. Instead, we show that the Church established a canonization procedure that was biased in favor of those miracle workers whose acolytes formed densely connected networks capable of harnessing local support. Rather than being inimical to each other, charismatic authorities and existing institutional structures formed symbiotic relationships. In addition to routinization and depersonalization, we suggest that charismatic authorities can also undergo a process of preservation, which depends on their ability to secure from existing institutions the resources needed to stabilize the relationships between themselves and their staffs.

Type
Articles
Information
Social Science History , Volume 38 , Issue 3-4 , Fall/Winter 2014 , pp. 455 - 481
Copyright
Copyright © Social Science History Association, 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ake, Claude (1966) “Charismatic legitimation and political integration.” Comparative Studies in Society and History 9 (1): 1–13.Google Scholar
Baehr, Peter (2008) Caesarism, Charisma and Fate: Historical Sources and Modern Resonances in the Work of Max Weber. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
Barro, Robert J., and McCleary, Rachel M. (2011) “Saints marching in, 1590–2009.” National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper No. 16769.Google Scholar
Bendix, Reinhard, and Roth, Guenther (1978) Max Weber: An Intellectual Portrait. Berkeley, Los Angeles, and London: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Biggart, Nicole Woolsey (1990) Charismatic Capitalism: Direct Selling Organizations in America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Boesch-Gajano, Sofia (1999) La santità. Roma-Bari: La Terza and Figli.Google Scholar
Bossy, John (1985) Christianity in the West: 1400–1700. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre (1987) “Legitimation and structured interests in Weber's sociology of religion,” in Lash, Scott and Whimster, Sam (eds.) Max Weber, Rationality and Modernity. London: Allen and Unwin: 119–36.Google Scholar
Braudel, Fernand (1992) Civilization and Capitalism, 15th–18th Century. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Breuilly, John (2011) “Max Weber, charisma and nationalist leadership.” Nations and Nationalism 17 (3): 477–99.Google Scholar
Caciola, Nancy (1996) “Through a glass, darkly: Recent work on sanctity and society. A review article.” Comparative Studies in Society and History 38 (2): 301–9.Google Scholar
Della Porta, Donatella, and Diani, Mario (1999) Social Movements: An Introduction. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
De Nooy, Wouter, Mravar, Andrej, and Batagelj, Vladimir (2005) Exploratory Social Network Analysis with Pajek. New York and Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dickens, Arthur G. (1968) The Counter-Reformation. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dow, Thomas (1969) “The theory of charisma.” The Sociological Quarterly 10 (3): 306–18.Google Scholar
Eisenstadt, S. N. (1968) “Introduction,” in Max Weber, Max Weber on Charisma and Institution Building. Chicago: University of Chicago Press: ix–lvi.Google Scholar
Evennett, Outram H. (1968) The Spirit of the Counter Reformation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gelman, Andrew, and Hill, Jennifer (2006) Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/Hierarchical Models. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ginzburg, Carlo (1976) Il formaggio ed i vermi. Il cosmo di un mugnaio del ’500. Torino, Italy: Einaudi.Google Scholar
Glassman, Ronald (1975) “Legitimacy and manufactured charisma.” Social Research 42 (4): 615–36.Google Scholar
Gotor, Mark (2000) “La fabbrica dei santi: la riforma urbaniana e il modello tridentino,” in Fiorani, L. and Prosperi, A. (eds.) Storia d'Italia, Vol. 16. Roma: Einaudi Editore: 679–727.Google Scholar
Gotor, Mark (2004) Chiesa e Santità nell'Italia moderna. Roma: Editori Laterza.Google Scholar
Incisa della Rocchetta, Giovanni, and Vian, Nello, eds. (1957) Il primo processo per San Filippo Neri. Città del Vaticano: Biblioteca Apostolica Vaticana.Google Scholar
Kantola, Anu (2009) “The rise of charismatic authority styles in corporate capitalism.” Journal of Power 2 (3): 423–40.Google Scholar
Khurana, Rakesh (2002) Searching for a Corporate Savior: The Irrational Quest for Charismatic CEOs. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kim, Sung Ho (2004) Max Weber's Politics of Civil Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mecklin, John M. (1941) The Passing of the Saint. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Papa, Giovanni (2001) Le cause di canonizzazione nel primo perido della Congregazione dei Riti (1588–1634). Città del Vaticano: Urbaniana University Press.Google Scholar
Parigi, Paolo (2006) “Fatti sociali e produzione di miracoli nel XVII secolo.” Polis XX (3): 431–62.Google Scholar
Parigi, Paolo (2010) “Miracle Mobilization in the XVII Century.” Sanctorum 7 (3): 1000–21.Google Scholar
Parigi, Paolo (2012) The Rationalization of Miracles. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pastor, Ludwig (1938) The History of the Popes, from the Close of the Middle Ages. London: K. Paul, Trench, Trubner.Google Scholar
Prosperi, Adriano (1986) “Dalle ‘divine madri’ ai padri spirituali,” in van Kessel, E. Schulte (ed.) Women and Men in Spiritual Culture: 14–17th Centuries. The Hague: Netherlands Government Publishing Office: 71–90.Google Scholar
Riesebrodt, Martin (1999) “Charisma in Max Weber's sociology of religion.” Religion 29 (1):1–14.Google Scholar
Rusconi, Roberto (1992) “Gli ordini religiosi maschili dalla Controriforma alle soppressioni settecentesche. Cultura, predicazione, missioni,” in Rosa, Mario (ed.) Clero e società nell'Italia moderna. Roma-Bari: Editori Laterza: 207–74.Google Scholar
Sallmann, Jean-Micheal (1994) Naples et ses saints à l’âge baroque: 1540–1750. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Schluchter, Wolfgang (1981) The rise of Western rationalism: Max Weber's developmental history. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Schluchter, Wolfgang (1989) Rationalism, Religion, and Domination: A Weberian Perspective. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Shils, Edward (1965) “Charisma, order, and status.” American Sociological Review 30 (2): 199–213.Google Scholar
Stanko, Andric (2000) The Miracles of St. John Capistran. Budapest: CEU Press.Google Scholar
Vauchez, Andre (2000) Santi, profeti e visionari. Il soprannaturale nel medioevo. Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Veraja, Fabiano (1988) Miscellanea in occasione del quarto centenario della Congregazione per le Cause dei Santi. Città del Vaticano: Libreria Editrice Vaticana.Google Scholar
Weber, Max (1948) From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Weber, Max (1978) Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Wilde, Melissa J. (2007) Vatican II: A Sociological Analysis of Religious Change. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar