Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T12:44:56.022Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Married Women’s Economic Independence and Divorce in the Nineteenth- and Early-Twentieth-Century United States

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 June 2018

Daniel MacDonald  and
Yasemin Dildar
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We analyze the effects of the Married Women’s Property Acts and Earnings Acts (EAs) on divorce rates in the late-nineteenth- and early-twentieth-century United States. We find that the property acts increased divorce rates, which is consistent with the predicted outcome, in household extensive bargaining models, of an increase in the married woman’s relative bargaining power. We also find some evidence that the EAs had a positive effect on divorce rates, though it is not statistically significant after accounting for the possibility that divorce rates changed prior to the enactment of an EA. To support our causal argument, we control for regional trends in the divorce rate and account for the timing of the laws’ effects. We also assess alternative explanations for the rise in divorce rates during the late nineteenth century, including age structure, divorce law, urbanization, economic development, and foreign immigration, and we find that only age structure and urbanization positively affected divorce rates along with the property acts. Finally, we provide support for our argument from court cases in which the acts were used to defend a woman’s property rights against claims from her ex-husband.

Type
Research Article
Information
Social Science History , Volume 42 , Issue 3 , Fall 2018 , pp. 601 - 629
Copyright
© Social Science History Association, 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alsan, Marcella, and Goldin, Claudia (2015) “Watersheds in infant mortality: The role of effective water and sewerage infrastructure, 1880–1915.” NBER Working Paper #21263.Google Scholar
Amato, Paul R., and Irving, Shelley (2006) “Historical trends in divorce in the United States.” in Mark A. Fine (ed.) Handbook of Divorce and Relationship Dissolution. New York: Routledge: 41–58.Google Scholar
Anderson, Siwan, and Eswaran, Mukesh (2009) “What determines female autonomy? Evidence from Bangladesh.” Journal of Development Economics 90 (2):179–191.Google Scholar
Angrist, Joshua D., and Pischke, Jörn-Steffen (2009) Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist’s Companion. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Basch, Norma (1979) “The legal fiction of marital unity in nineteenth-century America.” Feminist Studies 5 (2):346–366.Google Scholar
Basch, Norma (1982) In the Eyes of the Law: Women, Marriage, and Property in Nineteenth-Century New York. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Basch, Norma (1999) Framing American Divorce: From the Revolutionary Generation to the Victorians. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Becker, Gary S. (1981) A Treatise on the Family. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Cahn, Naomi (2002) “Faithless wives and lazy husbands: Gender norms in nineteenth century divorce law.” University of Illinois Law Review 3:651–698.Google Scholar
Chused, Richard H. (1983) “Married women’s property law: 1800–1850.” Georgetown Law Journal 71:1359–1425.Google Scholar
Cvrcek, Tomas (2009) “When Harry left Sally: A new estimate of marital disruption in the U.S., 1860–1948.” Demographic Research 21 (24):719–758.Google Scholar
Cvrcek, Tomas (2011) “U.S. marital disruption and its economic and social correlates, 1860–1948.” Journal of Family History 36 (2): 142–158.Google Scholar
England, Paula (2003) “Separative and soluble selves: Dichotomous thinking in economics.” in Marianne A. Ferber, and Julie A. Nelson (eds.) Beyond Economic Man: Feminist Theory and Economics. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press: 33–61.Google Scholar
England, Paula, and Kilbourne, Barbara S. (1990) “Markets, marriages and other mates: The problem of power.” In R. Friedland, and S. Robertson (eds.) Beyond the Marketplace: Rethinking Society and Economy. New York: Aldine.Google Scholar
Folbre, Nancy (1994) Who Pays for the Kids? Gender and the Structures of Constraint. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Friedberg, Leora (1998) “Did unilateral divorce raise divorce rates? Evidence from panel data.” American Economic Review 88 (3): 608–627.Google Scholar
Furstenberg, Frank F Jr (1994) “History and current status of divorce in the United States.” The Future of Children 4 (1): 29–43.Google Scholar
Geddes, Rick, and Lueck, Dean (2002) “The gains from self-ownership and the expansion of women’s rights.” American Economic Review 92 (4):1079–1092.Google Scholar
Geddes, Rick, and Tennyson, Sharon (2013) “Passage of the married women’s property acts and earnings acts in the United States: 1850–1920.” Research in Economic History 29:145–189.Google Scholar
Geddes, Rick, Lueck, Dean, and Tennyson, Sharon (2012) “Human capital accumulation and the expansion of women’s property rights.” Journal of Law and Economics 55 (4):839–867.Google Scholar
Gordon, Michael (1973) The American Family in Social-Historical Perspective. New York: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
Griswold, Robert L. (1982) Family and Divorce in California, 1850–1890. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Halem, Lynne Carol (1980) Divorce Reform: Changing Legal and Social Perspectives. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Hunt, William Chamberlain (1909) Marriage and Divorce, 1867–1906, Part 1. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Jacobson, Paul H. (1959) American Marriage and Divorce. New York: Rinehart and Company.Google Scholar
Jones, Mary (1978) An Historical Geography of the Changing Divorce Law in the United States. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina.Google Scholar
Kennedy, Sheela, and Ruggles, Steven (2014) “Breaking up is hard to count: The rise of divorce in the United States, 1980–2010.” Demography 51 (2): 587–598.Google Scholar
Khan, B. Zorina (1996) “Married women’s property laws and female commercial activity: Evidence from the United States patent records, 1790–1865.” Journal of Economic History 56 (2):356–388.Google Scholar
Lee, Jin Young, and Solon, Gary (2011) “The fragility of estimated effects of unilateral divorce laws on divorce rates.” B. E. Journal of Economic Analysis and Policy (Contributions) 11 (1): 49–62.Google Scholar
Lichtenberger, James P. (1909) Divorce: A Study in Social Causation. New York: Columbia University.Google Scholar
MacDonald, Daniel (2015) “On the question of court activism and economic interests in nineteenth-century married woman’s property law.” in Mark D. White (ed.) Law and Social Economics: Essays in Ethical Values for Theory, Practice, and Policy. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan: 139–160.Google Scholar
Manser, Marilyn, and Brown, Murray (1980) “Marriage and household decision-making: A bargaining analysis.” International Economics Review 21 (1): 31–44.Google Scholar
McDevitt, Catherine L., and Irwin, James R. (2017) “The narrowing of the gender wealth gap across the nineteenth-century United States.” Social Science History 41 (2): 255–281.Google Scholar
McElroy, Marjorie B., and Horney, Mary Jean (1981) “Nash-bargained household decisions: Toward a generalization of the theory of demand.” International Economic Review 22 (2): 333–349.Google Scholar
O’Neill, William L. (1965) “Divorce in the Progressive Era.” American Quarterly 17 (2, Pt. 1): 203–217.Google Scholar
Oppenheimer, Valerie K. (1997) “Women’s employment and the gain to marriage: The specialization and trading model.” Annual Review of Sociology 23:431–453.Google Scholar
Plateris, Alexander A. (1973) 100 years of marriage and divorce statistics: United States, 1867–1967, Department of Health, Education, and Welfare Publication No. 74-1902. Rockville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics.Google Scholar
Preston, Samuel H., and McDonald, John (1979) “The incidence of divorce within cohorts of American marriages contracted since the Civil War.” Demography 16 (1): 1–25.Google Scholar
Roberts, Evan (2014) “Women’s rights and women’s labor: Married women’s property law reform and labor force participation.” Unpublished manuscript (obtained from author).Google Scholar
Ross, Heather L., and Sawhill, Isabel V. (1975) Time of Transition: The Growth of Families Headed by Women. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.Google Scholar
Ruggles, Steven (1997) “The rise of divorce and separation in the United States, 1880–1990.” Demography 34 (4): 455–466.Google Scholar
Ruggles, Steven (2015) “Patriarchy, power, and pay: The transformation of American families, 1800–2015.” Demography 52 (6): 1797–1823.Google Scholar
Ruggles, Steven, Genadek, Katie, Goeken, Ronald, Grover, Josiah, and Sobek, Matthew (2015) Integrated public use microdata series: Version 6.0 [dataset]. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota http://doi.org/10.18128/D010.V6.0.Google Scholar
Sayer, Liana C., and Bianchi, Suzanne M. (2000) “Women’s economic independence and the probability of divorce.” Journal of Family Issues 7 (1): 906–943.Google Scholar
Schultz, Martin (1984) “Divorce in early America: Origins and patterns in three North Central states.” The Sociological Quarterly 25 (4): 511–525.Google Scholar
Schultz, Martin (1986) “Divorce in the south Atlantic states: Origins, historical patterns, and recent trends.” International Journal of Sociology of the Family 16 (2): 225–250.Google Scholar
Schultz, Martin (1990) “Divorce patterns in nineteenth-century New England.” Journal of Family History 15 (1): 101–115.Google Scholar
Shammas, Carole (1994) “Re-assessing the married women’s property acts.” Journal of Women’s History 6 (1): 9–30.Google Scholar
Siegel, Reva B. (1994) “Home as work: The first woman’s rights claim concerning wives’ household labor, 1850–1880.” Yale Law Journal 103:1073–1217.Google Scholar
Siegel, Reva B. (1995) “The modernization of marital status law: Adjudicating wives’ rights to earnings, 1860–1930.” Georgetown Law Journal 82:2127–2211.Google Scholar
Smith, Jonathan (1884) The Married Women's Statutes and Their Results Upon Divorce and Society: An Essay Read Before the Social Science Club at Clinton, February 19, 1884. Clinton, MA: Clinton Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Solon, Gary, Haider, Steven J., and Wooldridge, Jeffrey M. (2015) “What are we weighting for?” Journal of Human Resources 50 (2): 301–316.Google Scholar
Strow, Claudia, and Strow, Brian (2006) “A history of divorce and remarriage in the United States.” Humanomics 22 (4): 239–257.Google Scholar
Teachman, Jay (2010) “Wives’ economics resources and risk of divorce.” Journal of Family Issues 31 (10): 1305–1323.Google Scholar
Teachman, Jay, Tedrow, Lucky, and Hall, Matthew (2006) “The demographic future of divorce and dissolution.” in Mark A. Fine (ed.) Handbook of Divorce and Relationship Dissolution. New York: Routledge: 59–84.Google Scholar
U.S. Census Bureau (1864) Eighth Census of the United States: Population of the United States. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
U.S. Census Bureau (1872) Ninth Census of the United States: Volume 1: population. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
U.S. Census Bureau (1883) Tenth Census of the United States: Volumes 1 and 2: Population and manufacturing industries. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
U.S. Census Bureau (1895) Eleventh Census of the United States: Volumes 1 and 6: Population and manufacturing industries. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
U.S. Census Bureau (1902) Twelfth Census: Volume 1 (Part 2, population) and Volume 9: Manufactures. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
U.S. Census Bureau (1914) Thirteenth Census: Volume 4: Population, occupation statistics. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Willcox, Walter Francis (1897) The Divorce Problem: A Study in Statistics. New York: Columbia University.Google Scholar
Wolfers, Justin (2006) “Did unilateral divorce laws raise divorce rates? A reconciliation and new results.” American Economic Review 96 (5): 1802–1820.Google Scholar
Wright, Carrol D. (1889) Marriage and Divorce in the United States, 1867 to 1886. Washington, DC: Department of Labor.Google Scholar