Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T18:02:38.376Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Individuals and Aggregates

A Note on Historical Data and Assumptions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 January 2016

Paul F. Bourke  and
Donald A. DeBats
Paul F. Bourke
Affiliation:
The Flinders University of South Australia, Bedford Park, Australia
Donald A. DeBats
Affiliation:
The Flinders University of South Australia, Bedford Park, Australia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

After more than a decade's impressive achievement in the “new” social history and the “new” political history, two distinct though related problems require us to reconsider the data appropriate to these inquiries. First, recent commentators (Foner, 1974; Formi-sano, 1976) have pointed to the relative failure of research in these areas to converge, a failure made more obvious in the light of the programmatic optimism of the 1960s which held out the prospect of an integrated approach to the social basis of politics and to the political implications of social structure. Second, there has been in recent years some acknowledgment by historians (see below) of the vexing question of inferences across levels of data, a matter central to other social sciences and particularly pressing for historians of electoral behavior.

Type
Research Note
Information
Social Science History , Volume 4 , Issue 2 , Spring 1980 , pp. 229 - 250
Copyright
Copyright © Social Science History Association 1980 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

fn00

Author's Note:Research on the project reported here has been made possible through the generous support of the Australian Research Grants Committee.

References

Alexander, T., Elmore, P., Lowery, F. and Skinner, M. (1966) “The basis of Alabama's two-party system.” Alabama Rev. 19: 243—276.Google Scholar
Baum, D. (1978) “Know-nothingism and the Republican majority in Massachusetts: the political realignments of the 1850's.” J. of Amer. History 64: 959–986.Google Scholar
Benson, L. (1961) The Concept of Jacksonian Democracy: New York as a Test Case. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Bohmer, D. (1978) “The Maryland electorate and the concept of a party system in the early national period,” in Silbey, J. et al. (eds.), The History of American Electoral Behavior. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Bohmer, D. (1977) “The causes of electoral alignments: some considerations on how partisan behavior is shaped,” in Land, A. et al. (eds.), Law, Society and Politics in Early Maryland. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Bourke, P. (1975) “The pluralist reading of James Madison's Tenth Federalist.” Perspectives in Amer. History 9: 271–295.Google Scholar
Bourke, P. and DeBats, D. (1978) “Identifiability of voting in nineteenth century America: toward a comparison of Britain and the United States before the secret ballot.” Perspectives in Amer. History 11: 259–288.Google Scholar
Chudacoff, H. (1972) Mobile Americans: Residential and Social Mobility in Omaha 1880–1920. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Dykstra, R. (1973) “Stratification and community political systems: historians' models.” Amer. Behavioral Scientist 16: 695–712.Google Scholar
Foner, E. (1974) “The causes of the American civil war: recent interpretations and new directions.” Civil War History 20: 197–214.Google Scholar
Formisano, R. (1976) “Toward a reorientation of Jacksonian politics: a review of the literature 1959–1975.” J. of Amer. History 63: 42–65.Google Scholar
Formisano, R. (1971) the Birth of Mass Political Parties: Michigan 1827–1861. Princeton, NJ: Princeton, Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Firebaugh, G. (1978) “Individual-level relationships from aggregate data.” Amer. Soc. Rev. 43: 557–573.Google Scholar
Goodman, L. (1959) “Some alternatives to ecological correlation.” Amer. J. of Sociology 64: 610–625.Google Scholar
Hammarberg, M. (1977) The Indiana Voter: The Historical Dynamics of Party Allegiance During the 1870's. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hammond, J. (1979) “New approaches to aggregate electoral data.” J. of Interdisciplinary History 9: 473–492.Google Scholar
Henretta, J. (1977) “The study of social mobility.” Labor History 18: 165–178.Google Scholar
Jensen, R. (1978) “History from a deck of IBM cards.” Rev. in Amer. History 6: 229–234.Google Scholar
Jensen, R. (1971) The Winning of the Midwest: Social and Political Conflict, 1888–1896. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Jones, E. (1974) “Using ecological regression.” J. of Interdisciplinary History 4: 593–596.Google Scholar
Jones, E. (1972) “Ecological inference and electoral analysis,” J. of Interdisciplinary History 2: 249–269.Google Scholar
Katz, M. (1972) “Occupational classification in history.” J. of Interdisciplinary History 3: 63–88.Google Scholar
Katz, M., Doucet, M., and Stein, M. (1978) “Migration and the social order in Erie County, New York: 1855.” J. of Interdisciplinary History 8: 669–710.Google Scholar
Key, V. and Munger, F. (1959) “Social determinism and electoral decisions,” in Burdick, E. and Brodbeck, A. (eds.), American Voting Behavior. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Knights, P. (1971) The Plain People of Boston 1830–1860: A Study of City Growth. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Kousser, J. (1976) “The new political history: a methodological critique.” Reviews in Amer. History 4: 1–14.Google Scholar
Kousser, J. (1974) The Shaping of Southern Politics: Suffrage Restrictions and the Establishment of a One-Party South, 1880–1910. New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Kousser, J. (1973) “Ecological regression and the analysis of past politics.” J. of Interdisciplinary History 4: 237–262.Google Scholar
Lichtman, A. (1976) “Critical election theory and the reality of American presidential politics, 1916–1940.” Amer. Historical Rev. 81: 317–348.Google Scholar
Lichtman, A. (1974) “Correlation, regression and the ecological fallacy.” J. of Interdisciplinary History 4: 417–433.Google Scholar
Lichtman, A. and Langbein, L. (1978) “Ecological regression versus homogeneous units: a specification analysis.” Social Science History 2: 172–194.Google Scholar
Malin, J. (1935) “The turnover of the farm population in Kansas.” Kansas Historical Q. 4: 339–372.Google Scholar
McAllister, P. (1976) “Missouri Voters, 1840-1856: an analysis of ante-bellum voting behavior and political parties.” Ph.D. dissertation, University of Missouri—Columbia.Google Scholar
McCrary, P., Miller, C., and Baum, D. (1978) “Class and party in the secession crisis: voting behavior in the deep south, 1856–1861.” J. of Interdisciplinary History 8: 429–457.Google Scholar
Ranney, A. (1962) “The utility and limitations of aggregate data in the study of electoral data,” in Ranney, A. (ed.), Essays on the Behavioral Study of Politics. Urbana: Univ. of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Reynolds, D. (1974) “Spatial contagion in political influence processes,” in Cox, K. et al. (eds.), Locational Approaches to Power and Conflict. New York: Halsted (a Sage Publications book).Google Scholar
Robinson, W. (1950) “Ecological correlations and the behavior of individuals.” Amer. Soc. Rev. 15: 351–357.Google Scholar
Rozett, J. (1974) “The social basis of party conflict in the age of Jackson.” Ph.D. dissertation, University of Michigan.Google Scholar
Shover, J. and Kushma, J. (1978) “Retrieval of individual data from aggregate units of analysis: a case study using twentieth century urban voting data,” in Silbey, J. et al. (eds.), The History of American Electoral Behavior. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Stokes, D. (1969) “Cross-level inference as a game against nature,” in Bernd, J. (ed.), Mathematical Applications in Political Science. Charlottesville: Univ. of Virginia Press.Google Scholar
Stokes, D. (1967) “Parties and the nationalisation of electoral forces,” in Chambers, W. and Burnham, W. (eds.), The American Party Systems: Stages of Political Development. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Sweeney, K. (1976) “Rum, romanism, representation and reform coalition politics in Massachusetts, 1847–1853.” Civil War History 22: 116–137.Google Scholar
Thernstrom, S. (1973) The Other Bostonians: Poverty and Progress in the American Metropolis, 1880–1970. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Thernstrom, S. (1970) “Working class social mobility in industrial America,” in Richter, M. (ed.), Essays in Theory and History. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Thernstrom, S. (1964) Poverty and Progress: Social Mobility in a Nineteenth Century City. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Vincent, J. (1967) Pollbooks: How Victorians Voted. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar