Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T11:22:07.999Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Fordism and the Positivist Revenant

Response to Burris, Riley, and Fourcade

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 January 2016

George Steinmetz
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Special Section: Commentary on The Politics of Method in the Human Sciences: Positivism and Its Epistemological Others
Information
Social Science History , Volume 31 , Issue 1 , Spring 2007 , pp. 127 - 152
Copyright
Copyright © Social Science History Association 2007 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abrams, Philip (1982) Historical Sociology. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Adorno, Theodor W. (1974 [1945]) “Keeping one’s distance,” in Minima Moralia: Reflections from Damaged Life, trans. Jephcott, E. F. N.. London: Verso: 126–28.Google Scholar
Arendt, Hannah (1958 [1950]) The Origins of Totalitarianism. New York: World.Google Scholar
>Bénatouïl, Thomas (1999) “A tale of two sociologies: The critical and the pragmatic stance in contemporary French sociology.” European Journal of Social Theory 2: 379–96.Bénatouïl,+Thomas+(1999)+“A+tale+of+two+sociologies:+The+critical+and+the+pragmatic+stance+in+contemporary+French+sociology.”+European+Journal+of+Social+Theory+2:+379–96.>Google Scholar
Benjamin, Walter (1999) “The return of the flaneur,” in Jennings, Michael W., Eiland, Howard, and Smith, Gary (eds.) Walter Benjamin: Selected Writings. Vol. 2, pt. 1. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press: 262–67.Google Scholar
Bertilsson, Margareta, Therborn, Göran, and Luz Morán, María, eds. (1998) From a Doll’s House to the Welfare State: Reflections on Nordic Sociology. Montreal: Service de l’Information et des Relations Publiques de l’UQAM, Service de Graphisme.Google Scholar
Bhaskar, Roy (1975) A Realist Theory of Science. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester.Google Scholar
Bhaskar, Roy (1979) The Possibility of Naturalism: A Philosophical Critique of the Contemporary Human Sciences. New York: Humanities.Google Scholar
Bhaskar, Roy (1986) Scientific Realism and Human Emancipation. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre (1972) “Les doxosophes.” Minuit, no. 1: 26–47.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre (1979) Algeria, 1960, trans. Nice, Richard. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre (1989) La noblesse d’état: Grandes écoles et esprit de corps. Paris: Minuit.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre (1996) The Rules of Art: Genesis and Structure of the Literary Field, trans. Susan, Emanuel. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Boyer, Robert (2004) “Pierre Bourdieu: Analyste du changement? Une lecture à la lumière de la théorie de la régulation.” CEPREMAP, no. 2004-01, www.cepremap.cnrs.fr.Google Scholar
Boyer, Robert, and Saillard, Yves , eds. (2002) Regulation Theory: The State of the Art. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Brand, Ulrich, and Raza, Werner, eds. (2003) Fit für den Postfordismus? Theoretisch-politische Perspektiven des Regulationsansatzes. Münster: Westfälisches Dampfboot.Google Scholar
Calhoun, Craig (1996) “The rise and domestication of historical sociology,” in McDonald, Terrence J. (ed.) The Historic Turn in the Human Sciences. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press: 305–38.Google Scholar
Chandler, James, Davidson, Arnold I., and Harootunian, Harry, eds. (1994) Questions of Evidence: Proof, Practice, and Persuasion across the Disciplines. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Chatterjee, Partha (1993) The Nation and Its Fragments. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Cocks, Geoffrey (1997) Psychotherapy in the Third Reich: The Göring Institute. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.Google Scholar
Collier, Andrew (2005) “Critical realism,” in Steinmetz, George (ed.) The Politics of Method in the Human Sciences: Positivism and Its Epistemological Others. Durham, NC: Duke University Press: 327–45.Google Scholar
Cooley, Charles Horton (1930) “Case study of small institutions as a method of research,” in Cooley Angell, Robert (ed.) Sociological Theory and Social Research: Being Selected Papers of Charles Horton Cooley. New York: Holt: 313–22.Google Scholar
DeFleur, Melvin L., and Larsen, Otto N. (1958) The Flow of Information: An Experiment in Mass Communication. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
Elster, Jon (1998) “A plea for mechanisms,” in Hedström, Peter and Swedberg, Richard (eds.) Social Mechanisms: An Analytical Approach to Social Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 45–73.Google Scholar
Fischer, Eugen (1913) Die Rehobother Bastards und das Bastardierungsproblem beim Menschen. Jena: Fischer.Google Scholar
Freud, Sigmund (1961a [1909]) Five Lectures on Psycho-analysis. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Freud, Sigmund (1961b [1923]) “The ego and the id,” in Strachey, James (ed.) The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works, trans. Strachey, James et al. Vol. 19. London: Hogarth: 3–66.Google Scholar
Freud, Sigmund (2005 [1930]) Civilization and Its Discontents, trans. Strachey, James. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Gouldner, Alvin W. (1970) The Coming Crisis of Western Sociology. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
Grahl, John, and Teague, Paul (2000) “The régulation school, the employment relation, and financialization.” Economy and Society 29: 160–78.Google Scholar
Hedström, Peter, and Swedberg, Richard (1998) “Social mechanisms: An introductory essay,” in Hedström, Peter and Swedberg, Richard (eds.) Social Mechanisms: An Analytical Approach to Social Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 1–31.Google Scholar
Hempel, Carl Gustav (1965) “The function of general laws in history,” in Aspects of Scientific Explanation and Other Essays in the Philosophy of Science. New York: Free: 231–43.Google Scholar
Jessop, Bob (1999) “Narrating the future of the national economy and the national state? Remarks on re-mapping regulation and re-inventing governance,” in Steinmetz, George (ed.) State/Culture: State Formation after the Cultural Turn. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press: 378–405.Google Scholar
Kanazawa, Satoshi (2001) “Science vs. history: A reply to MacDonald.” Social Forces 80: 349–52.Google Scholar
Kaplan, Abraham (1964) The Conduct of Inquiry: Methodology for Behavioral Science. San Francisco: Chandler.Google Scholar
Keane, Webb (2005) “Estrangement, intimacy, and the objects of anthropology,” in Steinmetz, George (ed.) The Politics of Method in the Human Sciences: Positivism and Its Epistemological Others. Durham, NC: Duke University Press: 59–88.Google Scholar
Kiser, Edgar, and Hechter, Michael (1991) “The role of general theory in comparative-historical sociology.” American Journal of Sociology 97: 1–30.Google Scholar
Lacan, Jacques (1977 [1949]) “The mirror stage as formative of the function of the I,” in Ecrits: A Selection, trans. Sheridan, Alan. New York: Norton: 1–7.Google Scholar
Laclau, Ernesto, and Mouffe, Chantal (1985) Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politics, trans. Moore, Winston and Cammack, Paul. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Latour, Bruno (1987) Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Lerner, Daniel, ed. (1951) The Policy Sciences: Recent Developments in Scope and Method. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Lichtenstein, Nelson (1995) The Most Dangerous Man in Detroit: Walter Reuther and the Fate of American Labor. New York: Basic.Google Scholar
Lipietz, Alain (1993) “From Althusserianism to ‘regulation theory,’” in Ann Kaplan, E. and Sprinker, Michael (eds.) The Althusserian Legacy. London: Verso: 99–138.Google Scholar
Lipietz, Alain (2001) “Accumulation, crises, and ways out: Some methodological reflections on the concept of ‘regulation,’” in Jessop, Bob (ed.) Regulation Theory and the Crisis of Capitalism. Vol. 1, The Parisian Regulation School. Cheltenham: Elgar: 213–46.Google Scholar
Mahoney, James (2004) “Revisiting general theory in historical sociology.” Social Forces 83: 457–88.Google Scholar
Mamdani, Mahmood (1973) The Myth of Population Control: Family, Caste, and Class in an Indian Village. New York: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
Mihic, Sophia, Engelmann, Stephen, and Wingrove, Elisabeth (2005) “Facts, values, and ‘real’ numbers,” in Steinmetz, George (ed.) The Politics of Method in the Human Sciences: Positivism and Its Epistemological Others. Durham, NC: Duke University Press: 470–95.Google Scholar
Miller, Richard W. (1987) Fact and Method: Explanation, Confirmation, and Reality in the Natural and Social Sciences. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Nagel, Ernest (1979 [1961]) The Structure of Scientific Explanation. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.Google Scholar
Nichols, Bill (1991) Representing Reality: Issues and Concepts in Documentary. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Novick, Peter (1988) That Noble Dream: The “Objectivity Question” and the American Historical Profession. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Peace, William J. (1998) “Bernhard Stern, Leslie White, and an anthropological appraisal of the Russian Revolution.” American Anthropologist 100: 84–93.Google Scholar
Peirce, Charles Sanders (1955) Philosophical Writings of Peirce, ed. Buchler, Justus. New York: Dover.Google Scholar
Polanyi, Karl (1977) The Livelihood of Man. New York: Academic.Google Scholar
Popkin, Samuel L. (1979) The Rational Peasant: The Political Economy of Rural Society in Vietnam. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Porter, Theodore M. (1995) Trust in Numbers: The Pursuit of Objectivity in Science and Public Life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Price, David H. (2003) “Subtle means and enticing carrots: The impact of funding on American Cold War anthropology.” Critique of Anthropology 23: 373–401.Google Scholar
Price, David H. (2004) Threatening Anthropology: McCarthyism and the FBI’s Surveillance of Activist Anthropologists. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Reichenbach, Hans (1951) “Probability models in social science,” in Lerner, Daniel (ed.) The Policy Sciences: Recent Developments in Scope and Method. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press: 121–26.Google Scholar
Rickels, Laurence A. (2002) Nazi Psychoanalysis. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Rostow, W. W. (1960) The Stages of Economic Growth: A Non-Communist Manifesto. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sapiro, Gisèle (2005) “Structural history and crisis analysis: The literary field in France during WWII.” Paper presented at the conference “Bourdieuian Theory and Historical Analysis,” Center for Comparative Research, Yale University, May.Google Scholar
Sartre, Jean-Paul (2001) Colonialism and Neo-colonialism. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Schmitt, Carl (1985 [1922]) Political Theology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Sewell, William H. Jr. (1996) “Three temporalities: Toward an eventful sociology,” in McDonald, Terrence J. (ed.) The Historic Turn in the Human Sciences. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press: 245–80.Google Scholar
Somers, Margaret R. (1998) “‘We’re no angels’: Realism, rational choice, and relationality in social science.” American Journal of Sociology 104: 722–84.Google Scholar
Somers, Margaret R., and Block, Fred (2005) “From poverty to perversity: Ideas, markets, and institutions over two hundred years of welfare debate.” American Sociological Review 70: 260–87.Google Scholar
Steinmetz, George (1993) Regulating the Social: The Welfare State and Local Politics in Imperial Germany. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Steinmetz, George (1994) “Regulation theory, post-Marxism, and the new social movements.” Comparative Studies in Society and History 36: 176–212.Google Scholar
Steinmetz, George (2003) “‘The devil’s handwriting’: Precolonial discourse, ethnographic acuity, and cross-identification in German colonialism.” Comparative Studies in Society and History 45: 41–95.Google Scholar
Steinmetz, George (2004) “Odious comparisons: Incommensurability, the case study, and small n’s in sociology.” Sociological Theory 22: 371–400.Google Scholar
Steinmetz, George (2005a) “Return to empire: The new U.S. imperialism in theoretical and historical perspective.” Sociological Theory 23: 339–67.Google Scholar
Steinmetz, George (2005b) “The genealogy of a positivist haunting: Comparing prewar and postwar U.S. sociology.” boundary 2 32 (2): 109–35.Google Scholar
Steinmetz, George (2005c) “American sociology’s epistemological unconscious and the transition to post-Fordism: The case of historical sociology,” in Adams, Julia, Clemens, Elisabeth, and Orloff, Ann (eds.) Remaking Modernity: Politics, Processes, and History in Sociology. Durham, NC: Duke University Press: 109–57.Google Scholar
Steinmetz, George (2006a) “American sociology before and after World War Two: The (temporary) settling of a disciplinary field,” in Calhoun, Craig (ed.) Sociology in America: The ASA Centennial History. Chicago: University of Chicago Press: 258–93.Google Scholar
Steinmetz, George (2006b) “Bourdieu’s disavowal of Lacan: Psychoanalytic theory and the concepts of ‘habitus’ and ‘symbolic capital.’” Constellations 13: 445–64.Google Scholar
Steinmetz, George (2007) The Devil’s Handwriting: Precoloniality and the German Colonial State in Qingdao, Samoa, and Southwest Africa. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Topalov, Christian (2006) “‘Science of science’ and ‘sociology of scientific knowledge’: Making sense of a missed encounter.” Paper presented at the conference “Practicing Pierre Bourdieu,” University of Michigan,September 28-30.Google Scholar