Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T17:57:18.607Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Spaces of Personalisation: Place and Distance in Caring Labour

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2014

Catherine Needham
Catherine Needham*
Affiliation:
Health Services Management Centre, University of Birmingham E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The cluster of reforms to English social care associated with personalisation mark a break with recent thinking about what spaces are considered relevant and appropriate for people with an assessed social care need. The promise of personalisation from a spatial perspective appears to be twofold: expanding the physical spaces that are available to people, while at the same time contracting interpersonal spaces between people and those who support them to emphasise attentiveness and particularism. However, there is a danger that personalisation is much more variable in its impacts. The physical spaces for some are expanding while for others they contract, and these opportunities are likely to be unequally distributed in ways that overlay other forms of inequality. The attentiveness and particularism promised by personalisation is again patchily distributed, with wide variation in the quality of support planning and person-centred care. For the formal care workforce, the two concepts of space (physical environment and interpersonal closeness) intersect as physical spaces shape the capacity to deliver attentive, responsive care. The article brings these concepts together through a discussion of ‘caring labour’ at the intersection of the physical and emotional aspects of space.

Keywords

Personalisationpersonal budgetsemotional laboursocial carehome care
Type
Articles
Information
Social Policy and Society , Volume 14 , Issue 3 , July 2015 , pp. 357 - 369
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Association of Directors of Adult Social Services (2012) The Case for Tomorrow, London: ADASS.Google Scholar
Barnes, M. (2008) ‘Is the personal no longer political?’, Soundings, 39, 152–9.Google Scholar
Barnes, M. (2011) ‘Abandoning care? A critical perspective on personalisation from an ethic of care’, Ethics and Social Welfare, 5, 2, 153–67.Google Scholar
Barnes, M. (2012) Care in Everyday Life: An Ethic of Care in Practice, Bristol: The Policy Press.Google Scholar
Baxter, K. and Greener, I. (2011) ‘The implications of personal budgets for the home care market’, Public Money and Management, 31, 2, 91–8.Google Scholar
Baxter, K., Wilberforce, M. and Glendinning, C. (2011) ‘Personal budgets and the workforce implications for social care providers’, Social Policy and Society, 10, 1, 55–65.Google Scholar
Beresford, P. (2007) The Changing Roles and Tasks of Social Work from Service Users’ Perspectives: A Literature Informed Discussion Paper, London: Shaping Our Lives National User Network.Google Scholar
Beresford, P., Fleming, J., Glynn, M., Bewley, C., Croft, S., Branfield, F. and Postle, K. (2011) Supporting People: Towards a Person-Centred Approach, Bristol: The Policy Press.Google Scholar
Carr, S. and Dittrich, R. (2008) Personalisation: A Rough Guide, London: Social Care Institute for Excellence.Google Scholar
Clarke, J., Newman, J., Smith, N., Vidler, E. and Westmarland, L. (2007) Creating Citizen-Consumers: Changing Publics and Changing Public Services, London: Sage.Google Scholar
Conradson, D. (2003) ‘Spaces of care in the city: the place of a community drop-in centre’, Social and Cultural Geography, 4, 4, 507–25.Google Scholar
Cooper, A. and Lousada, J. (2005) Borderline Welfare, London: Karnac.Google Scholar
Davidson, J. (2005) ‘Professional relationship boundaries: a social work teaching module’, Social Work Education, 24, 5, 511–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Department for Education (2013) ‘Improving the adoption system and services for looked after children’, Press release, 3 January, https://www.gov.uk/government/news/new-drive-to-help-children-find-adoptive-families.Google Scholar
Department for Work and Pensions (2008) Raising Expectations and Increasing Support: Reforming Welfare for the Future, London: The Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Department of Health (2009) Personal Health Budgets: First Steps, London: Department of Health.Google Scholar
Department of Health (2013) Patients First and Foremost, The Initial Government Response to the Report of The Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust Public Inquiry, London: The Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Dunning, J. (2010a) ‘Ministers to be lobbied on personalisation development’, Community Care, 30 June.Google Scholar
Dunning, J. (2010b) ‘Personalisation may force day centre closures in Liverpool’, Community Care, 30 June.Google Scholar
Eiken, O. (2011) The Kunskapsskolan (‘The Knowledge School’): A Personalised Approach to Education, Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
Ellis, K. (2013) ‘Professional discretion and adult social work: exploring its nature and scope on the front line of personalisation’, British Journal of Social Work, doi:10.1093/bjsw/bct076.Google Scholar
Evans, T. (2013) ‘Organisational rules and discretion in adult social work’, British Journal of Social Work, 43, 4, 739–58.Google Scholar
Fawcett, B., Weber, Z. and Wilson, S. (2012) International Perspectives on Mental Health: Critical Issues across the Lifespan, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Ferguson, I. (2007) ‘Increasing user choice or privatizing risk: the antimonies of personalization’, British Journal of Social Work, 37, 3, 387–403.Google Scholar
Fernandez, J.-L., Snell, T. and Wistow, G. (2013) Changes in the Patterns of Social Care Provision in England: 2005/6 to 2012/13, London: PSSRU/LSE.Google Scholar
Forder, J., Jones, K., Glendinning, C., Caiels, J., Welch, E., Baxter, K., Davidson, J., Windle, K., Irvine, A., King, D. and Dolan, P. (2012) Evaluation of the Personal Health Budget Pilot Programme, London: Department of Health.Google Scholar
Glendinning, C., Halliwell, S., Jacobs, S., Rummery, K. and Tyer, J. (2000) ‘New kinds of care, new kinds of relationships: how purchasing affects relationships in giving and receiving personal assistance’, Health and Social Care in the Community, 8, 3, 201–11.Google Scholar
Glendinning, C., Challis, D., Fernandez, J., Jacobs, S., Jones, K., Knapp, M., Manthorpe, J., Moran, N., Netten, A., Stevens, M. and Wilberforce, M. (2008) Evaluation of the Individual Budgets Pilot Programme, York: Social Policy Research Unit.Google Scholar
Graty, C. (2008) ‘Cafe culture’, Living with Dementia, July.Google Scholar
Guy, M. E., Newman, M. A. and Mastraci, S. H. (2008) Emotional Labor: Putting the Service in Public Service, Armonk, NY: ME Sharpe.Google Scholar
Hatton, C. and Waters, J. (2013) National Personal Budgets Survey 2013: Summary of Main Findings and Next Steps, London: In Control/Lancaster University/TLAP.Google Scholar
Herod, A., Rainnie, A. and McGrath-Champ, S. (2007) ‘Working space: why incorporating the geographical is central to theorizing work and employment practices’, Work, Economy and Society, 21, 2, 247–64.Google Scholar
Himmelweit, S. (1999) ‘Caring labor’, Annals, AAPSS, 561, 1, 27–38.Google Scholar
HM Government (2007) Putting People First: A Shared Vision and Commitment to the Transformation of Adult Social Care, London: HM Government.Google Scholar
Hochshild, A. R. (1983) The Managed Heart: Commercialization of Human Feeling, Berkley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Hough, J. and Rice, B. (2010) Providing Personalised Support to Rough Sleepers, London: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.Google Scholar
Houston, S. (2010) ‘Beyond homo economicus: recognition, self-realization and social work’, British Journal of Social Work, 40, 3, 841–57.Google Scholar
Hudson, B. (2009) ‘Captives of bureaucracy’, Community Care, 9 April, 30–1.Google Scholar
Jones, K., Welch, E., Caiels, J., Windle, K., Forder, J., Davidson, J., Dolan, P., Glendinning, C., Irvine, A. and King, D. (2010) Experiences of Implementing Personal Health Budgets: 2nd Interim Report, PSSRU Discussion Article 2747/2, Canterbury: University of Kent.Google Scholar
Leadbeater, C., Bartlett, J. and Gallagher, N. (2008) Making It Personal, London: Demos.Google Scholar
Leece, J. (2010) ‘Paying the piper and calling the tune: power and the direct payment relationship’, British Journal of Social Work, 40, 1, 188–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leece, J. and Leece, D. (2011) ‘Personalisation: perceptions of the role of social work in a world of brokers and budgets’, British Journal of Social Work, 41, 2, 204–23.Google Scholar
Leece, J. and Peace, S. (2010) ‘Developing new understandings of independence and autonomy in the personalised relationship’, British Journal of Social Work, 40, 6, 1847–65.Google Scholar
Lloyd, L. (2010) ‘The individual in social care: the ethics of care and the “personalisation agenda” in services for older people in England’, Ethics and Social Welfare, 4, 2, 188–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lymbery, M. (2010) ‘A new vision for adult social care? Continuities and change in the care of older people’, Critical Social Policy, 30, 1, 5–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lymbery, M. (2012) ‘Social work and personalisation’, British Journal of Social Work, 42, 4, 783–92.Google Scholar
Lymbery, M. and Postle, K. (2010) ‘Social work in the context of adult social care in England and the resultant implications for social work education’, British Journal of Social Work, 38, 7, 2502–22.Google Scholar
Massey, D. (1984) Spatial Divisions of Labour: Social Structures and the Geography of Production, London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Massey, D. (2005) For Space, London: Sage.Google Scholar
Mastracci, S. H., Newman, M. A. and Guy, M. E. (2010) ‘Emotional labor: why and how to teach it’, Journal of Public Affairs Education, 16, 2, 123–41.Google Scholar
Mencap (2012) Stuck at Home: The Impact of Day Service Cuts on People with a Learning Disability, London: Mencap.Google Scholar
Menzies, I. (1960) ‘A case-study in the functioning of social systems as a defence against anxiety: a report on a study of the nursing service of a general hospital’, Human Relations, 13, 2, 95–121.Google Scholar
Milligan, C. (2000) ‘“Bearing the burden”: towards a restructured geography of caring’, Area, 32, 1, 19–58.Google Scholar
Milligan, C. (2009) There's no Place like Home: Place and Care in an Ageing Society, London: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Mitchell, W., Brooks, J. and Glendinning, C. (2013) ‘Involving carers in the personalisation of adult social care’, Social Policy in Challenging Times, Social Policy Association Annual Conference, 9–11 July, University of Sheffield.Google Scholar
Mol, A. (2008) The Logic of Care: Health and the Problem of Patient Choice, London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mullin, A. (2011) ‘Gratitude and caring labor’, Ethics and Social Welfare, 5, 2, 110–22.Google Scholar
Needham, C. (2007) The Reform of Public Services under New Labour: Narratives of Consumerism, Basingstoke: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Needham, C. (2011) Personalising Public Services: Understanding the Personalisation Narrative, Bristol: The Policy Press.Google Scholar
Needham, C. (2013) ‘Personalized commissioning, public spaces: the limits of the market in english social care services’, BMC Health Services Research,13, 1, S5.Google Scholar
Needham, C. (2014) ‘Personalisation: from day centres to community hubs?’, Critical Social Policy, 34, 1, 47–65.Google Scholar
Parr, H. (2000) ‘Interpreting the “hidden social geographies” of mental health: ethnographies of inclusion and exclusion in semi-institutional places’, Health and Place, 6, 3, 225–37.Google Scholar
Pratesi, A. (2011) ‘The productivity of care: contextualizing care in situated interaction and shedding light on its latent purposes’, Ethics and Social Welfare, 5, 2, 123–37.Google Scholar
Roulstone, A. and Morgan, H. (2009) ‘Neo-liberal individualism or self-directed support: are we all speaking the same language on modernising adult social care?’, Social Policy and Society, 8, 3, 333–45.Google Scholar
Rummery, K. (2011) ‘A comparative analysis of personalisation: balancing an ethic of care with user empowerment’, Ethics and Social Welfare, 5, 2, 138–52.Google Scholar
Sawbridge, Y. and Hewison, A. (2011) Time to Care? Responding to Concerns about Poor Nursing Care, Birmingham: Health Services Management Centre.Google Scholar
Scourfield, P. (2007) ‘Social care and the modern citizen: client, consumer, service user, manager and entrepreneur’, British Journal of Social Work, 37, 1, 107–22.Google Scholar
Scourfield, P. (2010) ‘Going for brokerage: a task of independent support or social work?’, British Journal of Social Work, 40, 3, 858–77.Google Scholar
Sevenhuijsen, S. (1998) Citizenship and the Ethics of Care: Feminist Considerations of Justice, Morality and Politics, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Slasberg, C. and Hatton, C. (2011) ‘Personalization – are personal budgets improving outcomes?’, Community Care, 30 September.Google Scholar
Slasberg, C., Beresford, P. and Schofield, P. (2012a) ‘Can personal budgets really deliver better outcome for all at no cost? Reviewing the evidence, costs and quality’, Disability and Society, 27, 7, 1029–34.Google Scholar
Slasberg, C., Beresford, P. and Schofield, P. (2012b) ‘How self directed support is failing to deliver personal budgets and personalisation’, Research, Policy and Planning, 29, 3, 161–77.Google Scholar
Smith, P. (1992) The Emotional Labour of Nursing, Basingstoke: Macmillan Education.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sowerby, D. (2010) ‘What sort of helping relationships are needed to make personalisation happen and how can organisations be developed to support this?’, Journal of Social Work Practice, 24, 3, 269–82.Google Scholar
Spandler, H. (2004) ‘Friend or foe? Towards a critical assessment of direct payments’, Critical Social Policy, 24, 2, 187–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stephens, L. and Michaelson, J. (2013) Buying Things Together, London: HACT.Google Scholar
Sudbery, J. (2002) ‘Key features of therapeutic social work: the use of relationship’, Journal of Social Work Practice: Psychotherapeutic Approaches in Health, Welfare and the Community, 16, 2, 149–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trevithick, P. (2003) ‘Effective relationship-based practice: a theoretical exploration’, Journal of Social Work Practice, 17, 2, 163–76.Google Scholar
Tronto, J. C. (1993) Moral Boundaries: A Political Argument for an Ethic of Care, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Tronto, J. (2010) ‘Creating caring institutions: politics, plurality and purpose’, Ethics and Social Welfare, 4, 2, 158–71.Google Scholar
Twigg, J. (2000) Bathing: The Body and Community Care, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ungerson, C. (1997) ‘Social politics and the commodification of care’, Social Politics, 4, 3, 362–81.Google Scholar
West, K. (2013) ‘The grip of personalization in adult social care: between managerial domination and fantasy’, Critical Social Policy, 33, 4, 638–57.Google Scholar
Williams, B. And Tyson, A. (2010) ‘Self-direction, place and community – re-discovering the emotional depths: a conversation with social workers in a London borough’, Journal of Social Work Practice, 24, 3, 319–33.Google Scholar
Williams, F. (2010) ‘Review article. Migration and care: themes, concepts and challenges’, Social Policy and Society, 9, 3, 385–96.Google Scholar
Williams, V., Porter, S. and Marriott, A. (2013) ‘Your life, your choice: support planning led by disabled people's organisations’, British Journal of Social Work, doi:10.1093/bjsw/bct005.Google Scholar
Yanow, D. (2000) Conducting Interpretive Policy Analysis, London: Sage.Google Scholar
Yeandle, S. and Steill, B. (2007) ‘Issues in the development of the direct payment scheme for older people in England’, in Ungerson, C. and Yeandle, S. (eds.), Cash for Care in Developed Welfare States, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 104–36.Google Scholar
Yeatman, A. (2009) Individualization and the Delivery of Welfare Services: Contestation and Complexity, Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar