Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T13:15:14.339Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Relationship between the Child Support Grant and Teenage Fertility in Post-Apartheid South Africa

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 August 2013

Eric O. Udjo
Eric O. Udjo*
Affiliation:
Bureau of Market Research, University of South Africa E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Governments often provide some form of social assistance to vulnerable groups. The right to social security is enshrined in the South African Constitution and the Social Assistance Act 13 of 2004. The country provides for a child support grant to single parents or caregivers who are low-income earners. The impact of the child support grant on teenage pregnancy in South Africa has aroused interest in the last couple of years, sparking debate that it may be encouraging teenage pregnancy. However, empirical evidence has been produced to confirm this relationship. This study examines the relationship between receiving the child support grant and being pregnant with another child in two national data sets using logistic regression analysis and empirical data. The results indicate that teenagers who receive the child support grant are significantly less likely to be pregnant with another child compared with teenagers who do not receive the child support grant.

Keywords

Child support grantteenage pregnancyteenage fertilitySouth Africa
Type
Articles
Information
Social Policy and Society , Volume 13 , Issue 4 , October 2014 , pp. 505 - 519
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aasve, A. and Lappegard, T. (2009) ‘Child care benefits and fertility timing in Norway’, European Journal of Population, 25, 1, 67–88.Google Scholar
Allen, E., Bonell, C., Strange, V., Copas, A., Stephenson, J., Johnson, A. M. and Oakley, A. (2007) ‘Does the UK government's teenage pregnancy strategy deal with the correct risk factors? Findings from a secondary analysis of data from a randomised trial of sex education and their implications for policy’, Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 61, 1, 20–7.Google Scholar
Aoo, K., Butters, S., Lamhauge, N., Nappier-Moore, R. and Ono, Y. (2007) ‘Whose (transformative) reality counts? A critical review of the transformative social protection framework’, Institute of Development Studies Bulletin, 38, 3, 29–31.Google Scholar
Blanchard, O. and Landier, A. (2002) ‘The perverse effects of partial labour market reform: fixed-term contracts in France’, The Economic Journal, 112, 480, F214–F244.Google Scholar
Bongaarts, J. (1978) ‘A framework for analyzing the proximate determinants of fertility’, Population and Development Review, 4, 1, 105–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brannstrom, L. and Stenberg, S. (2007) ‘Does social assistance recipiency influence unemployment? Macro-level findings from Sweden in a period of turbulence’, Acta Sociologica, 50, 4, 347–62.Google Scholar
Case, A., Hosegood, V. and Lund, F. (2005) ‘The reach and impact of child support grants: evidence from KwaZulu-Natal’, Development Southern Africa, 22, 4, 467–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chimere-Dan, O. (1993) ‘Racial patterns of fertility decline in South Africa’, in International Union for the Scientific Study of Population, International Population Conference, Montreal, volume 1, Liege: IUSSP, pp. 43–51.Google Scholar
Cunningham, P. W. and Boult, B. E. (1996) ‘Black teenage pregnancy in South Africa: some considerations’, Adolescence, 31, 123, 691–700.Google Scholar
Devereux, S. and Sabates-Wheeler, R. (2004) Transformative Social Protection, Institute of Development Studies Working Paper 232, Brighton: IDS.Google Scholar
Devereux, S. and Sabates-Wheeler, R. (2007a) ‘Social protection for transformation’, Institute of Development Studies Bulletin, 38, 3, 23–8.Google Scholar
Devereux, S. and Sabates-Wheeler, R. (2007b) ‘Editorial introduction: debating social protection’, Institute of Development Studies Bulletin, 38, 3, 1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Devereux, S. (2011) ‘Social protection in South Africa: exceptional or exceptionalism?’, Canadian Journal of Development Studies, 32, 4, 414–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gentiline, U. and Omamo, S. W. (2011) ‘Social protection 2.0: exploring issues, evidence and debates in a globalizing world’, Food Policy, 36, 3, 329–40.Google Scholar
Goldenberg, R. L. and Klerman, L. V. (1995) ‘Adolescent pregnancy: another look’, New England Journal of Medicine, 332, 17, 1161–62.Google Scholar
Guenther, B., Huda, K. and Macauslan, I. (2007) ‘Broadening social risk management: risks, rights and the chronic poor’, Institute of Development Studies Bulletin, 38, 3, 17–19.Google Scholar
Gustafsson, S. and Worku, S. (2007) ‘Teenage motherhood and long-run outcomes in South Africa’, Tinbergen Institute Discussion Paper, TI 2007-024/3, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Haddad, L. (2007). ‘Comment on the role of social risk management in development: a World Bank view’, Institute of Development Studies Bulletin, 38, 3, 14–16.Google Scholar
Hajnal, J. (1953) ‘Age at marriage and proportions marrying’, Population Studies, 2, 7, 111–36.Google Scholar
Holzmann, R., Sherburne-Benz, L. and Tesliuc, E. (2003) Social Risk Management: The World Bank's Approach to Social Protection in a Globalizing World, Washington, DC: The World Bank.Google Scholar
Hosmer, D. W. and Lemeshow, S. (2000) Applied Logistic Regression, New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Imamura, M., Tucker, J., Hannaford, P., Da Silva, M. O., Astin, M., Wyness, L. and Bloemenkamp, K. W. (2007) ‘Factors associated with teenage pregnancy in the European Union countries: a systematic review’, European Journal of Public Health, 17, 6, 630–6.Google Scholar
Karra, M. and Lee, M. (2012) ‘Human capital consequences of teenage childbearing in South Africa’, Population Reference Bureau Research Brief, Population Reference Bureau, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Kesho Consulting and Business Solutions (2006) Report on Incentive Structures of Social Assistance Grants in South Africa, Pretoria: Department of Social Development.Google Scholar
Laryea-Adjei, G., Devereux, S. and Motepe, M. (2011) ‘Impact evaluation of South Africa's child support grant on child protection: a qualitative review’, unpublished report, UNICEF/IDS/Department of Social Development, Pretoria.Google Scholar
Macleod, C. and Tracey, T. (2009) Review of South African Research and Interventions in the Development of a Policy Strategy on Teen-Aged Pregnancy, Grahamstown: Rhodes University.Google Scholar
Makiwane, M. (2010) ‘The child support grant and teenage childbearing in South Africa’, Development Southern Africa, 27, 2, 193–204.Google Scholar
Makiwane, M. and Udjo, E. (2006) Is the Child Support Grant Associated with an Increase in Teenage Fertility in South Africa? Evidence from National Surveys and Administrative Data, Pretoria: Human Sciences Research Council.Google Scholar
Medeiros, M., Britto, T. and Soares, F. V. (2008) Targeted Cash Transfer Programmes in Brazil: BPC and Bolsa Familia, Working Paper, 46, Brasil: International Poverty Centre.Google Scholar
Miller, B. C. and Benson, B. (2001) ‘Family relationships and adolescent pregnancy risk: a research synthesis’, Development Review, 21, 1, 1–38.Google Scholar
Mirugi-Mukundi, G. (2009) Realising the Social Security Rights of Children in South Africa, with Particular Reference to the Child Support Grant, Cape Town: University of the Western Cape, Community Law Centre.Google Scholar
Mood, C. (2010) ‘Logistic regression: why we cannot do what we think we can do, and what we can do about it’, European Sociological Review, 26, 1, 67–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moultrie, T. A. and McGrath, N. (2007) ‘Teenage fertility rates falling in South Africa’, South African Medical Journal, 97, 6, 442–3.Google Scholar
Patel, L. (2005) Social Welfare and Social Development in South Africa, Cape Town: Oxford University Press Southern Africa.Google Scholar
Patel, L., Hochfield, T., Moodley, J. and Mutwali, R. (2012) The Gender Dynamics and Impact of the Child Support Grant in Doornkp, Soweto, Johannesburg: University of Johannesburg, Centre for Social and Development Studies.Google Scholar
Republic of South Africa (2004) ‘Social Assistance Act 13 of 2004’, Government Gazette 26446, Cape Town: Government Printing Works.Google Scholar
Samson, M., Lee, U., Ndlebe, A., Mac Quene, K., Van Niekerk, I., Ghandi, V., Harigaya, T. and Abrahams, C. (2004) The Social and Economic Impact of South Africa's Social Security System, Pretoria: Economic Policy Research Institute.Google Scholar
Sear, R. and Mace, R. (2008) ‘Who keeps children alive? A review of the effects of kin on child survival’,Evolution and Human Behaviour, 29, 1, 1–18.Google Scholar
Statistics South Africa (Stats SA) (2007) Community Survey 2007: Methodology, Processes and Highlights of Key Results, Pretoria: Statistics South Africa.Google Scholar
Statistics South Africa (Stats SA) (2010) General Household Survey, Pretoria: Statistics South Africa.Google Scholar
Statistics South Africa (Stats SA) (2012) Census 2011: Statistical Release, Pretoria: Statistics South Africa.Google Scholar
Sunday Times (2012) ‘Our teens swap books for babies’, 15 April, 6.Google Scholar
The South African Social Security Agency (2013) A Statistical Summary of Social Grants in South Africa, Pretoria: SASSA, www.sassa.gov.za/Portals/1/Documents/fb6278e9-4e00-4a94-a317-701b79a8ac08.pdf (accessed 22.05.2013).Google Scholar
Udjo, E. O. (2003) ‘A re-examination of levels and differentials in fertility in South Africa from recent evidence’, Journal of Biosocial Science, 35, 3, 413–31.Google Scholar
Udjo, E. O. (2005) ‘An examination of recent census and survey data on mortality within the context of HIV/AIDS’, in Zuberi, T., Sibanda, A. and Udjo, E. (eds.), The Demography of South Africa, New York: M. E. Sharpe, p. 104.Google Scholar
Udjo, E. O. (2009) ‘Trends in the age pattern of fertility, 1995–2005, in the context of the child support grant in South Africa’, Development Southern Africa, 26, 2, 289–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
United Nations System Task Team (2012) Social Protection: A Development Priority in the Post-2015 UN Development Agenda, New York: United Nations, www.un.org/millenniumgoals/pdf/Think%20Pieces/16_social_protection.pdf (accessed 10.12.2012).Google Scholar
Woodward, L., Fergusson, D. M. and Horwood, L. J. (2001) ‘Risk factors and life processes associated with teenage pregnancy: results of a prospective study from birth to 20 years’, Journal of Marriage and Family, 63, 4, 1170–84.Google Scholar
Woolard, I., Harttgen, K. and Klassen, S. (2011) ‘The history and impact of social security in South Africa: experiences and lessons’, Canadian Journal of Development Studies, 32, 4, 357–80.Google Scholar