Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T22:23:00.362Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Reassessing the ‘Social Investment Perspective’ for ‘Inclusive Growth’: Where do Older Workers Fit?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 June 2016

Christopher Deeming  and
Paul Smyth
Christopher Deeming
Affiliation:
School of Social Work and Social Policy, University of Strathclyde, Scotland E-mail: [email protected]
Paul Smyth
Affiliation:
School of Social and Political Sciences, University of Melbourne, Australia E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The notion of building welfare around work poses fresh challenges from a life-course perspective, where the situation of older workers has largely been neglected by policymakers committed to the ‘social investment perspective’ – typically constructed as a policy paradigm for ‘human capital’ development in children and young adults (Esping-Andersen, 2002). This article seeks to re-focus attention on the policy challenges relating to the needs of older workers within the new ‘inclusive growth’ agendas that seek to advance equitable opportunities for all. Social investment policies pose a range of issues and challenges for ageing populations that are discussed and examined in detail in this article. If social investment policy is to succeed in ageing OECD societies, it will mean broadening the investment perspective to include the (neglected) education and training needs of older workers to ensure that everyone can contribute to and share in economic prosperity.

Keywords

social investmentinclusive growthhuman capitalactive labour market policyageing populations
Type
Themed Section on Policy Responses to Ageing and the Extension of Working Lives
Information
Social Policy and Society , Volume 15 , Issue 4 , October 2016 , pp. 659 - 674
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Armingeon, K. and Bonoli, G. (eds.) (2006) The Politics of Post-Industrial Welfare States: Adapting Post-War Social Policies to New Social Risks, Oxon and New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Australian Human Rights Commission (2015) Willing to Work: National Inquiry into Employment Discrimination against Older Australians and Australians with Disability, https://www.humanrights.gov.au/sites/default/files/document/publication/discussion-paper-age.pdf.Google Scholar
Belchamber, G. (2013) ‘To fix a flaw and fix the floor: unemployment insurance for Australia’, in Smyth, P. and Buchanan, J. (eds.), Inclusive Growth in Australia: Social Policy as Economic Investment, Sydney: Allen & Unwin, 193–204.Google Scholar
Biggs, S. (2013), ‘Inclusive growth and adult ageing’, in Smyth, P. and Buchanan, J. (eds.), Inclusive Growth in Australia: Social Policy as Economic Investment, Sydney: Allen & Unwin, 258–75.Google Scholar
Burke, G. (2013) ‘Skills for growth and inclusion’, in Smyth, P. and Buchanan, J. (eds.), Inclusive Growth in Australia: Social Policy as Economic Investment, Sydney: Allen & Unwin, 132–54.Google Scholar
Dean, H. (2014) ‘Life-first welfare and the scope for a “eudemonic ethic” of social security’, in Keune, M. and Serrano, A. (eds.), Deconstructing Flexicurity and Developing Alternative Approaches: Towards New Concepts and Approaches for Employment and Social Policy, Abingdon: Routledge, 152–72.Google Scholar
Deeming, C. (2009) ‘“Active Ageing” in practice: a case study in East London, UK’, Policy and Politics, 37, 1, 93–111.Google Scholar
Deeming, C. (2014) ‘Social democracy and social policy in neoliberal times’, Journal of Sociology, 50, 4, 577–600.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Deeming, C. (2016) ‘Rethinking social policy and society’, Social Policy and Society, 15, 2, 159–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deeming, C. and Smyth, P. (2015) ‘Social investment after neoliberalism: policy paradigms and political platforms’, Journal of Social Policy, 44, 2, 297–318.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eichhorst, W. and Marx, P. (eds.) (2015) Non-Standard Employment in Post-Industrial Labour Markets: An Occupational Perspective, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esping-Andersen, G., Gallie, D., Hemerijck, A. and Myles, J. (eds.) (2002) Why We Need a New Welfare State, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esping-Andersen, G. (2002) ‘A child-centred social investment strategy’, in Esping-Andersen, G., Gallie, D., Hemerijck, A. and Myles, J. (eds.), Why We Need a New Welfare State, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 26–67.Google Scholar
Filges, T., Smedslund, G., Knudsen, A. S. D. and Jørgensen, A. M. K. (2015) ‘Active labour market programme participation for unemployment insurance recipients: a systematic review’, Campbell Systematic Reviews, 11, 2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giddens, A. (1998), The Third Way: The Renewal of Social Democracy, Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Giovannini, E. (2008) Understanding Economic Statistics: An OECD Perspective, Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
Hall, J., Giovannini, E., Morrone, A. and Ranuzzi, G. (2010) A Framework to Measure the Progress of Societies, OECD Statistics Working Paper 34, Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
Review, Harmer (2009) Pension Review Report, Canberra ACT: Commonwealth of Australia.Google Scholar
Heckman, J. J. and Masterov, D. V. (2007), ‘The productivity argument for investing in young children, Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, 29, 3. 446–493.Google Scholar
Hemerijck, A. (2013) Changing Welfare States, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jenson, J. (2010) ‘Diffusing ideas for after neoliberalism: the social investment perspective in Europe and Latin America’, Global Social Policy, 10, 1, 59–84.Google Scholar
Jenson, J. (2012) ‘Redesigning citizenship regimes after neoliberalism: moving towards social investment’, in Morel, N., Palier, B. and Palme, J. (eds.), Towards a Social Investment Welfare State? Ideas, Policies and Challenges, Bristol: Policy Press, 61–87.Google Scholar
Kvist, J. (2015) ‘A framework for social investment strategies: integrating generational, life course and gender perspectives in the EU social investment strategy’, Comparative European Politics, 13, 1, 131–49.Google Scholar
Lindh, T. (2011) ‘Social investment in the ageing populations of Europe’, in Morel, N., Palier, B. and Palme, J. (eds.), Towards a Social Investment Welfare State? Ideas, Policies and Challenges, Bristol: Policy Press, 261–84.Google Scholar
Morel, N., Palier, B. and Palme, J. (eds.) (2012) Towards a Social Investment Welfare State? Ideas, Policies and Challenges, Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar
Morel, N., Palier, B. and Palme, J. (2015), ‘The Long Road towards a Social Investment Welfare State’, in Hasmath, R. (ed.), Inclusive Growth, Welfare and Development, New York, NY: Routledge, pp. 124–141.Google Scholar
Nolan, B. (2013), ‘What use is ‘social investment’?’, Journal of European Social Policy, 23, 5. 459–68.Google Scholar
OECD (2006a) Live Longer, Work Longer, Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
OECD (2006b) Boosting Jobs and Incomes: Policy Lessons from Reassessing the OECD Jobs Strategy, Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
OECD (2011) Pensions at a Glance 2011: Retirement-income Systems in OECD and G20 Countries, Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
OECD (2012) Education at a Glance 2012, Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
OECD (2013) OECD Skills Outlook 2013: First Results from the Survey of Adult Skills, Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
OECD (2015a) Ageing and Employment Policies, Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
OECD (2015b) Ageing and Employment Policies Denmark: Working Better with Age, Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
Perkins, D., Nelms, L. and Smyth, P. (2005) ‘Beyond neo-liberalism: the social investment state?’, Just Policy: A Journal of Australian Social Policy, 38, 34–41.Google Scholar
Scarpetta, S., Sonnet, A. and Manfredi, T. (2010) Rising Youth Unemployment During The Crisis: How to Prevent Negative Long-term Consequences on a Generation?, OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers No. 106, Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
Sharit, J. and Czaja, S. J. (2012) ‘Job design and redesign for older workers’, in Borman, W. C. and Hedge, J. W. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Work and Aging, New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 454–82.Google Scholar
Smyth, P. (2007) Social Investment in Human Capital: Revisioning Australian Social Policy, Social Policy Working Paper No. 8, Melbourne: Centre for Public Policy, University of Melbourne.Google Scholar
Smyth, P. and Buchanan, J. (eds.) (2013a) Inclusive Growth in Australia: Social Policy as Economic Investment, Sydney: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Smyth, P. and Buchanan, J. (2013b) ‘Introduction’, in Smyth, P. and Buchanan, J. (eds.), Inclusive Growth in Australia: Social Policy as Economic Investment, Sydney: Allen & Unwin, xiii–xxv.Google Scholar
Smyth, P. and Deeming, C. (forthcoming) ‘The “social investment perspective” in social policy: a longue durée perspective’, Social Policy and Administration.Google Scholar
Taylor, P. (2002) New Policies for Older Workers, Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar
Tilton, T. (1993) ‘The role of ideology in social democratic politics’, in Misgeld, K., Molin, K. and Amark, K. (eds.), Creating Social Democracy: A Century of the Social Democratic Labor Party in Sweden, University Park, Pennsylvania: The Pennsylvania State University Press, 409–27.Google Scholar