Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T13:23:39.289Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Prepare for Impact? Reflecting on Knowledge Exchange Work to Improve Services for Older LGBT People in Times of Austerity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 November 2013

Andrew King
Andrew King*
Affiliation:
Department of Sociology, University of Surrey E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article reflects on the experience of undertaking a knowledge exchange project with a local government authority to improve services for older lesbian, gay, bisexual and trans (LGBT) adults. It frames this project in terms of local government equality work, existing research and initiatives concerning older LGBT people and the coming of austerity. The project methodology is detailed, including discussion of the generation and measurement of impact. Some critical issues that arose during the project are considered, including suggestions that these may have been related to economic austerity. The article concludes that although knowledge exchange work with older LGBT people faces challenges in such times, future research and initiatives are warranted.

Keywords

Knowledge exchangeimpactLGBTausterity
Type
Articles
Information
Social Policy and Society , Volume 14 , Issue 1 , January 2015 , pp. 15 - 27
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Addis, S., Davies, M., Greene, G., MacBride-Stewart, S. and Shepherd, M. (2009) ‘The health, social care and housing needs of lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender older people: a review of the literature’, Health and Social Care in the Community, 17, 6, 647–58.Google Scholar
Adetunji, J. (2011) ‘Elderly struggling to cope with social care cuts’, The Guardian, 27 October.Google Scholar
Age Concern (2002) Issues Facing Older Lesbians, Gay Men and Bisexuals, London: Age Concern.Google Scholar
Age Concern (2006) ‘The Whole of Me. . .’: Meeting the Needs of Older Lesbians, Gay Men and Bisexuals Living in Care Homes and Extra Care Housing, London: Age Concern.Google Scholar
Age UK (2011a) Factsheet 16: Transgender Issues in Later Life, London: Age UK, http://www.openingdoorslondon.org.uk/resources/AgeUK_Transgender_issues_in_later_life.pdf (accessed 30 August.2012).Google Scholar
Age UK (2011b) ‘Spending on older people's care to be cut by 8.4 per cent this year reveals new Age UK research’, Age UK, London, http://www.ageuk.org.uk/latest-press/spending-on-older-peoples-care-to-be-cut-by-84 (accessed 30 May 2013).Google Scholar
Almack, K. (2007) ‘Palliative care and end of life care for the non-heterosexual community’, End of Life Care for Nurses, 1, 2, 27–32.Google Scholar
Almack, K., Seymour, J. and Bellamy, G. (2010) ‘Exploring the impact of sexual orientation on experiences and concerns about end of life care and on bereavement for lesbian, gay and bisexual older people’, Sociology, 44, 5, 908–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, D. and Binnie, J. (2000) The Sexual Citizen: Queer Politics and Beyond, Oxford: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Brooks, A. K. and Edwards, K. (2009) ‘Allies in the workplace: including LGBT in HRD’, Advances in Developing Human Resources, 11, 1, 136–49.Google Scholar
Bryman, A. (2004) Social Research Methods, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Carabine, J. and Monro, S. (2004) ‘Lesbian and gay politics and participation in New Labour's Britain’, Social Politics,11, 2, 312–27.Google Scholar
Carr, S. (2010) Personalisation: A Rough Guide, London: Social Care Institute for Excellence.Google Scholar
Carr, S. and Ross, P. (2013) Assessing Current and Future Housing and Support Options for Older LGB People, York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.Google Scholar
Colgan, F., Creegan, C., McKearney, A. and Wright, T. (2007) ‘Equality and diversity policies and practices at work: lesbian, gay and bisexual workers’, Equal Opportunities International, 26, 6, 590–609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colgan, F. and McKearney, A. (2012) ‘Visibility and voice in organisations: lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgendered employee networks’, Equality, Diversity and Inclusion: An International Journal, 31, 4, 359–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colgan, F. and Wright, T. (2011) ‘Lesbian, gay and bisexual equality in a modernizing public sector 1997–2010: opportunities and threats’, Gender Work and Organization, 18, 5, 548–70.Google Scholar
Colgan, F., Wright, T., Creegan, C. and McKearney, A. (2009) ‘Equality and diversity in the public services: moving forward on lesbian, gay and bisexual equality?’, Human Resource Management Journal, 19, 3, 280–301.Google Scholar
Concannon, L. (2009) ‘Developing inclusive health and social care policies for older LGBT citizens’, British Journal of Social Work, 39, 3, 403–17.Google Scholar
Cook-Daniels, L. (2002) Lesbian, Gay Male, Bisexual and Transgendered Elders: Elder Abuse and Neglect Issues, Milwaukee: FORGE.Google Scholar
Cooper, D. (2006) ‘Active citizenship and the governmentality of local lesbian and gay politics’, Political Geography, 25, 8, 921–43.Google Scholar
Crawford, R. and Phillips, D. (2012) Local Government Spending: Where is the Axe Falling, London: Institute for Fiscal Studies, http://www.ifs.org.uk/budgets/gb2012/12chap6.pdf (accessed 12 August 2013).Google Scholar
Dangerfield, A. (2011) ‘London HIV services cut as infections rise’, BBC News Online, 31 May, http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-13578283.Google Scholar
Davies, P. and River, L. (2006) Being Taken Seriously: The Polari in Partnership Project – Promoting Change for Older Lesbians, Gay Men and Bisexuals, London: Polari, http://www.casweb.org/polari/file-storage/ (accessed 31 October 2008).Google Scholar
Department of Trade and Industry Women and Equality Unit (2003) Civil Partnership: A Framework for the Legal Recognition of Same-Sex Couples, London: Department for Trade and Industry.Google Scholar
Emlet, C. A. (2006) ‘“You're awfully old to have this disease”: experiences of stigma and ageism in adults 50 years and older living with HIV/AIDS’, Gerontologist, 46, 6, 781–90.Google Scholar
ESRC (2013) Impact Toolkit, London: ESRC, http://www.esrc.ac.uk/funding-and-guidance/tools-and-resources/impact-toolkit/ (accessed 28 June 2013).Google Scholar
Fannin, A., Fenge, L.-A., Hicks, C., Lavin, N. and Brown, K. (2008) Social Work Practice with Older Lesbians and Gay Men, Exeter: Learning Matters.Google Scholar
Fenge, L.-A., Fannin, A., Armstrong, A., Hicks, C. and Taylor, V. (2009) ‘Lifting the lid on sexuality and ageing: the experiences of volunteer researchers’, Qualitative Social Work, 8, 4, 509–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fenge, L.-A. (2010) ‘Striving towards inclusive research: an example of participatory action research with older lesbians and gay men’, British Journal of Social Work, 40, 3, 878–94.Google Scholar
Fish, J. (2009) ‘Invisible no more? Including lesbian, gay and bisexual people in social work and social care’, Practice: Social Work in Action, 21, 1, 47–64.Google Scholar
Ginn, J. (2013) ‘Austerity and inequality: exploring the impact of cuts in the UK by gender and age’, Research on Ageing and Social Policy, 1, 1, 28–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guasp, A. (2011) Lesbian, Gay and Bisexual People in Later Life, London: Stonewall.Google Scholar
Harrison, J. (2006) ‘Coming out ready or not!’ Gay, lesbian, bisexual, transgender and intersex ageing and aged care in Australia: reflections, contemporary developments and the road ahead’, Gay and Lesbian Issues and Psychology Interest Group of the Australian Psychological Society, 2, 2, 44–53.Google Scholar
Heaphy, B. and Yip, A. K. T. (2006) ‘Policy Implications of ageing sexualities’, Social Policy and Society, 5, 4, 443–51.Google Scholar
Humphrey, J. (1999) ‘Organizing sexualities, organized inequalities: lesbians and gay men in public service occupations’, Gender, Work and Organization, 6, 3, 134–51.Google Scholar
Hunt, R. and Minsky, A. (2005) Reducing Health Inequalities for Lesbian Gay and Bisexual people: Evidence of Health Care Needs, London: Stonewall.Google Scholar
Kairos in Soho (2011) The London LGBT Voluntary and Community Sector Almanac, London: Kairos in Soho, http://www.centred.org.uk/sites/centred/files/documents/London%20LGBT%20Amanac%201st%20Edition%20(PDF).pdf (accessed 31 May 2013).Google Scholar
McNiff, J. and Whitehead, J. (2002) Action Research: Principles and Practice, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
McNulty, A., Richardson, D. and Monro, S. (2010) Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Trans (LGBT) Equalities and Local Governance: Research Report for Practitioners and Policy Makers, Newcastle: Newcastle University, http://research.ncl.ac.uk/selg/documents/selgreportmarch2010.pdf (accessed 26 June 2013).Google Scholar
MetLife (2006) Out and Aging The MetLife Study 1111111of Lesbian and Gay Baby Boomers, Westport, CT: MetLife Mature Market Institute, https://www.metlife.com/assets/cao/mmi/publications/studies/mmi-out-aging-lesbian-gay-retirement.pdf (accessed 4 February 2008).Google Scholar
Mitchell, M., Howarth, C., Kotecha, M. and Creegan, C. (2009) Sexual Orientation Research Review 2008, Manchester: Equality and Human Rights Commission.Google Scholar
Monro, S. (2006) ‘Evaluating local government equalities work: the case of sexualities initiatives in the UK’, Local Government Studies, 32, 1, 19–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monro, S. (2010) ‘Sexuality, space and intersectionality: the case of lesbian, gay and bisexual equalities initiatives in UK local government’, Sociology, 44, 5, 996–1010.Google Scholar
NatCen (2013) Implications of Austerity on LGBT People in Public Services, London: NatCen, http://www.natcen.ac.uk/study/implications-of-austerity-on-lgbt-people-in-public-services.Google Scholar
Price, E. (2005) ‘All but invisible: older gay men and lesbians’, Nursing Older People 17, 4, 16–18.Google Scholar
Reid-Smith, T. (2012) ‘Londond's gay charities lose 20% of their staff’, Gay Star News, 18 December.Google Scholar
Richardson, D. and Monro, S. (2013) ‘Public duty and private prejudice: sexualities equalities and local government’, Sociological Review, 61, 1, 131–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, N. (1998) ‘People with HIV/AIDS: who cares?’, Journal of Advanced Nursing, 28, 4, 771–8.Google Scholar
Robson, C. (2011) Real World Research, Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Silver, C. (2008) ‘Participatory approaches to social research’, in Gilbert, G. N. (ed.), Researching Social Life, London: Sage, pp. 101–24.Google Scholar
Smulian, M. (2013) ‘Osborne's spending review slashes council budgets by 10%’, Public Finance, http://www.publicfinance.co.uk/news/2013/06/osbornes-spending-review-slashes-council-budgets-by-10/ (accessed 2 July 2013).Google Scholar
Stringer, E. T. (2007) Action Research, London: Sage.Google Scholar
Taylor, J. (2012) Working with Older Lesbian, Gay and Bisexual People: A Guide for Care and Support Services, London: Stonewall.Google Scholar
Walker, A. (2008) ‘Commentary: The emergence and application of active aging in Europe’, Journal of Aging and Social Policy, 21, 1, 75–93.Google Scholar
Ward, R., River, L. and Fenge, L.-A. (2008) ‘Neither silent nor invisible: a comparison of two participative projects involving older lesbians and gay men in the United Kingdom’, Journal of Gay and Lesbian Social Services, 20, 1–2, 147–65.Google Scholar
Whittle, S., Turner, L., Al-Alami, M., Rundall, E. and Thom, B. (2007) Engendered Penalties: Transgender and Transsexual People's Experiences of Inequality and Descrimination, London: Equalities Review/Press for Change.Google Scholar
Willis, P., Ward, N. and Fish, J. (2011) ‘Searching for LGBT carers: mapping a research agenda in social work and social care’, British Journal of Social Work, 41, 7, 1304–20.Google Scholar