Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T22:56:27.887Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Pragmatic, Progressive, Problematic: Addressing Vulnerability through a Local Street Sex Work Partnership Initiative

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 February 2017

Kate Brown  and
Teela Sanders
Kate Brown
Affiliation:
Department of Social Policy and Social Work, University of York E-mail: [email protected]
Teela Sanders
Affiliation:
Department of Criminology, University of Leicester E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Whilst it remains a criminal activity to solicit sex publicly in the UK, it has become increasingly popular to configure sex workers as ‘vulnerable’, often as a means of foregrounding the significant levels of violence faced by female street sex workers. Sex work scholars have highlighted that this discourse can play an enabling role in a moralistic national policy agenda which criminalises and marginalises those who sell sex. Yet multiple and overlapping narratives of vulnerability circulate in this policy arena, raising questions about how these might operate at ground level. Drawing on empirical data gathered in the development of an innovative local street sex work multi-agency partnership in Leeds, this article explores debates, discourses and realities of sex worker vulnerability. Setting applied insights within more theoretically inclined analysis, we suggest how vulnerability might usefully be understood in relation to sex work, but also highlight how social justice for sex workers requires more than progressive discourses and local initiatives. Empirical findings highlight that whilst addressing vulnerability through a local street sex work multi-agency partnership initiative, a valuable platform for shared action on violence in particular can be created. However, an increase in fundamental legal and social reform is required in order to address the differentiated and diverse lived experiences of sex worker vulnerability.

Keywords

Vulnerabilitysex workprostitutiondecriminalisationsafety
Type
Themed Section on Vulnerability and Social Justice
Information
Social Policy and Society , Volume 16 , Issue 3 , July 2017 , pp. 429 - 441
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ava Caradonna and x:talk project (2016) ‘We speak but you don't listen: migrant sex worker organising at the border’, https://www.opendemocracy.net/beyondslavery/sws/ava-caradonna-x-talk-project/we-speak-but-you-don-t-listen-migrant-sex-worker-organisi.Google Scholar
Barry, K. (1995) Prostitution and Sexuality, New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Bevir, M. (2013) A Theory of Governance, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Brown, K. (2011) ‘“Vulnerability”: handle with care’, Journal of Ethics and Social Welfare, 5, 3, 313–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, K. (2014) ‘Questioning the vulnerability zeitgeist: care and control practices with “vulnerable” young people’, Social Policy and Society, 13, 3, 371–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, K. (2015) Vulnerability and Young People: Care and Social Control in Policy and Practice, Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar
Brown, K. and Moore, J. (2014) Prostitution in Leeds: Preliminary Scoping Research, Leeds: Safer Leeds and University of York.Google Scholar
Butler, J. (2004) Precarious Life: The Powers of Mourning and Violence, London: Verso.Google Scholar
Campbell, R. (2014) ‘Not getting away with it: linking sex work and hate crime in Merseyside’, in Chakraborti, N. and Garland, J. (eds.), Responding to Hate Crime: The Case to Connecting Policy & Research, Bristol: Policy Press, 57–72.Google Scholar
Carline, A. (2009) ‘Ethics and vulnerability in street prostitution: an argument in favour of managed zones’, Crimes and Misdemeanours, 3, 1, 20–53 Google Scholar
Carline, A. (2011) ‘Criminal justice, extreme pornography and prostitution: protecting women or promoting morality?’, Sexualities, 14, 3, 312–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carline, A. and Scoular, J. (2015) ‘Saving fallen women now? Critical perspectives on engagement and support orders and their policy of forced welfarism’, Social Policy and Society, 14, 1, 103–12.Google Scholar
Deering, K., Amin, A., Shoveller, J., Nesbitt, A., Garcia-Moreno, C., Duff, P., Argento, E. and Shannon, K. (2014) ‘A systematic review of the correlates of violence against sex workers’, American Journal of Public Health, 104, 5, e42–e54.Google Scholar
Feis-Bryce, A. (2016) ‘National Ugly Mugs presentation’, Queens University School of Law, Belfast, 3 March 2016.Google Scholar
Geymonat, G. and Macioti, P. G. (2016) ‘Sex workers speak: who listens?’, Open Democracy ‘Beyond Trafficking and Slavery’ issue, https://www.opendemocracy.net/beyondslavery/sws/giulia-garofalo-geymonatGeymonat-pg-macioti/sex-workers-speak-who-listens.Google Scholar
Grenfell, P. and Platt, L. (2015) ‘The health impacts of criminalisation of sex work’, NUM UK NSWP Policy, Policing and Protection Conference, Manchester, 2 March 2015.Google Scholar
Gubbay, J. (1999) ‘The European Union role in the formation, legitimation and implementation of migration policy’, in Dale, G. and Cole, M. (eds.), The European Union and Migrant Labour, Oxford: Berg, 23–35.Google Scholar
Hewer, R. (2015) ‘Towards a progressive prostitution policy: countering the neoliberal turn’, paper presented at the Social Policy Association Conference, Belfast, July 2015.Google Scholar
Home Office (2004) Paying the Price: A Consultation Paper on Prostitution, London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Home Office (2011) Effective Practice in Responding to Prostitution, https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/effective-practice-in-responding-to-prostitution.Google Scholar
Kinnell, H. (2008) Violence and Sex Work in Britain, Cullompton, Devon: Willan.Google Scholar
Laing, M., Pilcher, K. and Smith, N. (2015) (eds.) Queer Sex Work, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lowman, J. (2000) ‘Violence and the outlaw status of street prostitution in Canada’, Violence Against Women, 6, 9, 987–1011.Google Scholar
Munro, V. and Scoular, J. (2012) ‘The abuse of vulnerability in prostitution law, policy and politics’, Feminist Legal Studies, 20, 3, 30–52.Google Scholar
Munro, V. and Scoular, J. (2013) ‘Harm, vulnerability and citizenship: constitutional concerns in the criminalisation of contemporary sex work’, in Duff, R. A., Farmer, L., Marshall, S. E., Ranzo, M. and Tadross, V. (eds.), The Constitution of the Criminal Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 30–53.Google Scholar
National Police Chief Council (2015) National Policing Sex Work Guidance, London: College of Policing.Google Scholar
Phoenix, J. and Oerton, S. (2005) Illicit and Illegal: Sex, Regulation and Social Control, Cullompton: Willan.Google Scholar
Phoenix, J. (2012) ‘Sex work, sexual exploitations and consumerism’, in Carrington, K., Ball, M., O'Brien, E. and Tauri, J. (eds.), Crime, Justice and Social Democracy: International Perspectives, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 149–61.Google Scholar
Quesada, J., Hart, L. K. and Borbois, P. (2011) ‘Structural vulnerability and health: Latino migrant labourers in the United States’, Medical Anthropology, 30, 4, 339–62.Google Scholar
Roulstone, A., Thomas, P. and Balderson, S. (2011) ‘Between hate and vulnerability: unpacking the British criminal justice system's construction of disablist hate crime’, Disability and Society, 26, 3, 351–64.Google Scholar
Roulstone, A. and Sadique, K. (2013) ‘“Vulnerability” and the fight for legal recognition’, in Roulstone, A. and Mason-Bish, H. (eds.), Disability, Hate Crime and Violence, Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Sagar, T. (2010) ‘Anti-social powers and the regulation of street sex work’, Social Policy and Society, 9, 1, 101–09.Google Scholar
Salfati, C. G., James, A. and Ferguson, L. (2008) Prostitute Homicides: A Descriptive Study Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 23, 4, 505–43.Google Scholar
Sanders, T. (2009) ‘Sex crime and the internet’, in Jewkes, Y. and Yar, M. (eds.), Handbook of Internet Crime, Cullompton Devon: Willan, 302–19.Google Scholar
Sanders, T. (2015) Evaluation of the Leeds Managed Area Pilot Project, Leeds City Council.Google Scholar
Sanders, T. (2016) ‘Inevitably violent? Dynamics of space, governance and stigma in understanding violence against sex workers’, Law, Politics and Society, 71, 93–114.Google Scholar
Sanders, T. and Campbell, R. (2007) ‘Designing out violence, building in respect: violence, safety and sex work policy’, British Journal of Sociology, 58, 1, 1–18.Google Scholar
Sanders, T. and Campbell, R. (2014) ‘Criminalisation, protection and rights: global tensions in the governance of commercial sex’, Criminology and Criminal Justice Studies, 14, 6, 535–48.Google Scholar
Sanders, T., Connelly, L. and Jarvis-King, L (2016) ‘On our own terms: working conditions amongst internet based sex workers in the UK’, Sociological Research Online, 21, 4, 15.Google Scholar
Sanders, T., Hardy, K. and Campbell, R. (2015) ‘Regulating strip-based entertainment: sexual entertainment venue policy and the ex/inclusion of dancers’ perspectives and needs', Social Policy and Society, 14, 1, 83–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanders, T., O'Neill, M. and Pitcher, J. (2009) Prostitution: Sex Work, Policy and Politics, London: Sage.Google Scholar
Scoular, J. (2016) The Subject of Prostitution: Sex Work, Law and Social Theory, Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Scoular, J. and O'Neill, M. (2007) ‘Regulating prostitution: social inclusion, responsibilization and the politics of politics of prostitution reform’, British Journal of Criminology, 47, 5, 764–78.Google Scholar
Scoular, J. and Carline, A. (2014) ‘A critical account of a “creeping neo-abolitionism”: regulating prostitution in England and Wales’, Criminology and Criminal Justice, 14, 5, 608–26.Google Scholar
Whowell, M. (2010) ‘Male sex work: exploring regulation in England and Wales’, Journal of Law and Society, 37, 1, 125–44.Google Scholar
Wolfenden, J. (1957) Report of the Committee on Homosexual Offences and Prostitution, London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Wiles, J. (2011) ‘Reflections on being a recipient of care: vexing the concept of vulnerability’, Social and Cultural Geography, 12, 6, 573–88.Google Scholar