Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T11:20:31.393Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Not Going It Alone: Social Integration and Tenancy Sustainability for Formerly Homeless Substance Users

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2009

Graham Bowpitt  and
Rachel Harding
Graham Bowpitt
Affiliation:
School of Social Sciences, Nottingham Trent University E-mail: [email protected]
Rachel Harding
Affiliation:
Framework Housing Association E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article draws on findings from a study of a specialised tenancy support service for homeless substance users in a Midlands city, and contributes to debates about what makes solutions to homelessness sustainable. Two approaches to tenancy support are examined: first, a resettlement model based on risk management; and, second, a restorative model which prioritises support that enables people to rebuild their lives in a more holistic sense. Conclusions point to a need for a broader training for tenancy support workers and a funding level that enables them to stay with their clients long enough to facilitate this fuller restoration.

Type
Articles
Information
Social Policy and Society , Volume 8 , Issue 1 , January 2009 , pp. 1 - 11
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bowpitt, G. and Jepson, M. (2007), ‘Stability versus progress: finding an effective model of supported housing for formerly homeless people with mental health needs’, Social and Public Policy Review, 2, 1.Google Scholar
CLG (2007), ‘Providing housing and support: lessons and good practice’, Department for Communities and Local Government, London, at http://www.spkweb.org.uk/NR/rdonlyres/03974118-B76E-44E9-A332-F8E735581543/11396/ProvidingHousingandSupportLessonsFinal.pdf [accessed 27 March 2007].Google Scholar
CLG (2008), ‘Research into the effectiveness of floating support services for the Supporting People programme’, Department for Communities and Local Government, London, at http://www.spkweb.org.uk/search/channels/www.spkweb.org.uk/subjects/supporting-people-independent-review/reportintotheeffectivenessoffloatingsupportservice.pdf [accessed 14 May 2008].Google Scholar
Colson, C. (2000), Justice that Restores, Leicester: Inter-Varsity Press.Google Scholar
Crane, M. and Warnes, A. (2004), Wet Day Centres for Street Drinkers: A Research Report and Manual, Sheffield: University of Sheffield Institute for Studies on Ageing.Google Scholar
DTLR (2002), More than a Roof: A Report into Tackling Homelessness, London: Department for Transport, Local Government and the Regions.Google Scholar
Fountain, J., Howes, S., Marsden, J., Taylor, C., and Strang, J. (2003), ‘Drug and alcohol use and the link with homelessness: results from a survey of homeless people in London’, Addiction Research and Theory, 11, 4, 245–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gurstein, P. and Small, D. (2005), ‘From housing to home: reflexive management for those deemed hard to house’, Housing Studies, 20, 5, 717–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Homeless Link (2007), ‘Clean break: integrated housing and care pathways for homeless drug users’, at http://www.homeless.org.uk/policyandinfo/research/archive/cleanbreak [accessed 12 November 2007].Google Scholar
Johnstone, G. and Van Ness, D.W. (2007), ‘The meaning of restorative justice’ in Handbook of Restorative Justice, Cullompton: Willan Publishing.Google Scholar
Lemos, G. (2000), Homelessness and Loneliness: the Want of Conviviality, London: Crisis.Google Scholar
Lomax, D. and Netto, G. (2007), ‘Evaluation of tenancy sustainment teams’, Department for Communities and Local Government, London, at http://www.communities.gov.uk/pub/924/EvaluationofTenancySustainmentTeamsResearchreport_id1505924.pdf [accessed 27 March 2007].Google Scholar
NAO (2005), ‘More than a roof: progress in tackling homelessness’, The Stationery Office, London, at http://www.nao.org.uk/publications/nao_reports/04–05/0405286.pdf [accessed 29 November 2007].Google Scholar
Neale, J. and Kennedy, C. (2002), ‘Good practice towards homeless drug users: research evidence from Scotland’, Health and Social Care in the Community, 10, 3, 196–205.Google ScholarPubMed
Nixon, J., Hunter, C., Parr, S., Myers, S., Whittle, S., and Sanderson, D. (2006), ‘Interimevaluation of rehabilitation projects for families at risk of losing their homes as a result of anti-social behabiour’, ODPM, London, at http://www.communities.gov.uk/documents/housing/pdf/143393.pdf [accessed 14 May 2008].Google Scholar
ODPM (2004), ‘What is supporting people?’, Office of the Deputy Prime Minister, London, at http://www.spkweb.org.uk/NR/rdonlyres/06E6FD41–4801-4B78-BDD9–343EC58117A2/4165/WhatisSuppPeopleLP.pdf [accessed 26 March 2007].Google Scholar
Pleace, N. and Quilgars, D. (2003), ‘Supporting people: guide to accommodation and support options for homeless households’, ODPM, London, at http://www.spkweb.org.uk/NR/rdonlyres/958DA11F-4151–4C71-B1EC-2D300EE9524/0/Guide_to_Accommodation_and_Support_Options_for_Homeless_Households.pdf [accessed 27 March 2007].Google Scholar
Randall, G. and Brown, S. (2003), The Support Needs of Homeless Households, London: ODPM.Google Scholar
Seal, M. (2005), Resettling Homeless People: Theory and Practice, Lyme Regis: Russell House Publishing.Google Scholar
Tavecchio, L. and Thomeer, M. (1999), ‘Attachment, social network and homelessness in young people’, Social Behavior and Personality, 27, 3, 247–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar