Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T14:32:36.463Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Managing Social Change and Social Policy in Greater China: Welfare Regimes in Transition?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 March 2014

Ka Ho Mok  and
John Hudson
Ka Ho Mok
Affiliation:
Department of Asian and Policy Studies, The Hong Kong Institute of Education E-mail: [email protected]
John Hudson
Affiliation:
Department of Social Policy and Social Work, University of York E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Discussion of welfare regimes and welfare state ideal types continues to dominate comparative social policy analysis, but the focus of the debate has expanded considerably since the publication of Esping-Andersen's (1990) groundbreaking The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Shifts in this debate have been prompted by a mixture of theoretical and empirical concerns raised by comparative social policy scholars, but they have also resulted from a more general internationalisation of social policy research agendas within the academy too. In particular, there has been a strong desire to expand the scope of the debate to encompass nations and regions not included in Esping-Andersen's initial study of just eighteen high income OECD states.

Type
Themed Section on Managing Social Change and Social Policy in Greater China: Welfare Regimes in Transition?
Information
Social Policy and Society , Volume 13 , Issue 2 , April 2014 , pp. 235 - 238
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Esping-Andersen, G. (1990) The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism, Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Holliday, I. (2000) ‘Productivist welfare capitalism: social policy in East Asia’, Political Studies, 48, 4, 706–23.Google Scholar
Katzenstein, P. J. (1985) Small States in World Markets: Industrial Policy in Europe, Ithaca/London: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Lau, M. and Mok, K. H. (2010) ‘Is welfare restructuring and economic development in post-1997 Hong Kong in search of a cohesive society?’, in Mok, K. H. and Ku, Y. W. (eds.), Social Cohesion in Greater China, New York and Singapore: World Scientific, pp. 287–318.Google Scholar
Lee, E. (1998) Asian Financial Crisis: The Challenge for Social Policy, Geneva: International Labour Office.Google Scholar
Mok, K. H. (2011) ‘Right diagnosis and appropriate treatment for the global financial crisis? Social protection measures and social policy responses in East Asia’, in Hwang, G. J. (ed.), New Welfare States in East Asia, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 155–74.Google Scholar
Wilding, P. (2008) ‘Is the East Asian welfare model still productive?’, Journal of Asian Public Policy, 1, 1, 18–31.Google Scholar