Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T16:21:38.588Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Last Actor Standing Against Populism? The Role of the Catholic Church in Italy and its Defence of Social Assistance and Migration Policies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 January 2021

Emmanuele Pavolini ,
Marco Arlotti  and
Ugo Ascoli
Emmanuele Pavolini
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science, Communication and International Relations, University of Macerata, Italy E-mail: [email protected]
Marco Arlotti
Affiliation:
Department of Architecture and Urban Studies, Polytechnic Milan, Italy E-mail: [email protected]
Ugo Ascoli
Affiliation:
Department of Economic and Social Sciences, Marche Polytechnic University, Italy E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Churches’ positions and preferences in social policy are often described in the literature as fixed over time. The article challenges this assumption. In particular, it shows how the Italian Catholic Church (CC) changed over time its position toward social assistance and migration policies. In relation to social assistance, the CC has shifted from an antagonist approach to public intervention to the support of a universal public minimum income scheme. At a time of increasing aversion towards migrants, the Catholic Church has also become one of the few core actors in Italian society advocating explicitly for more welcoming migration policies and criticising national governments, especially the populist ones. Four factors explain these changes: the way institutions have worked in this policy field, CC material interests, how new ideas on social rights and social justice have been re-elaborated within the CC and its moral authority in politics.

Keywords

Social policyItalyreligionsocial assistancemigration policies
Type
Themed Section: Populism, Religion and Social Policy
Information
Social Policy and Society , Volume 20 , Issue 2 , April 2021 , pp. 340 - 355
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alleanza contro la povertà (2015) Reddito di inclusione sociale (Reis). Proposta, Rome, Alleanza contro la povertà.Google Scholar
Ascoli, U. and Arlotti, M. (2019) ‘Religiously oriented welfare organizations in Italy before and after the Great Recession: toward a more relevant role in the provision of social services?’, in Manuel, P. C. and Glatzer, M. (eds.), Faith-Based Organizations and Social Welfare, Palgrave Studies in Religion, Politics, and Policy, London: Palgrave Macmillan, 47–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ascoli, U. and Pavolini, E. (eds.) (2015) The Italian Welfare State in European Perspective: A Comparative Analysis, Bristol, Policy Press.Google Scholar
Ascoli, U. and Pavolini, E. (eds.) (2017) Volontariati oggi. Il volontariato italiano fra impegno politico e crisi del modello sociale, Bologna, Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Ascoli, U., Ranci, C. and Pavolini, E. (2002) ‘The new partnership: the changing relationship between state and the third sector in the scenario of new social policies in Italy’, in Ascoli, U. and Ranci, C. (eds.), Dilemmas of the Welfare Mix, New York, Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Avvenire (2017a) Consiglio Permanente Cei. Bagnasco: famiglia e povertà, è l’ora degli aiuti, 23 January.Google Scholar
Avvenire (2017b) Cei. Galantino: la polemica sul voto non oscuri i problemi delle famiglie e dei poveri, 26 January.Google Scholar
Avvenire (2017c) ‘Il dialogo. Bassetti: sosteniamo la legge della nuova cittadinanza’, 24 June.Google Scholar
Avvenire (2017d) ‘Cei. Bassetti: una Chiesa che impari dai poveri’, 5 June.Google Scholar
Avvenire (2017e) ‘Migranti. La Caritas: l’accordo Italia-Libia non fermerà i trafficanti’, 4 FebruaryGoogle Scholar
Avvenire (2017f) ‘Le nuove norme. Caritas: «Basta binomio migranti-sicurezza»’, 11 FebruaryGoogle Scholar
Avvenire (2018a) ‘Papa. Francesco: i migranti non sono una minaccia alla nostra comodità’, 14 June.Google Scholar
Avvenire (2018b) ‘Decreto sicurezza. Gualzetti (Caritas): colpo all’integrazione’, 26 September,Google Scholar
Avvenire (2019) ‘Astalli. Bassetti: «Soccorrere i migranti, istituzioni prendano loro responsabilità»’, 4 April.Google Scholar
Barberis, E. and Boccagni, P. (2014) ‘Blurred rights, local practices: social work and immigration in Italy’, The British Journal of Social Work, 44 (Issue suppl_1), i70–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bassi, M. (2014) ‘The Christian support networks for immigrants in Palermo,’ Partecipazione and Conflitto 7, 1, 58–82.Google Scholar
Béland, D. (2005) ‘Ideas and social policy: an institutionalist perspective’, Social Policy and Administration, 39, 19, 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Béland, D. (2009) ‘Ideas, institutions, and policy change’, Journal of European Public Policy, 16, 5, 701–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Béland, D. and Cox, R.H. (eds.) (2010) Ideas and Politics in Social Science Research, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caritas (2018) Rapporto 2018 su povertà e politiche di contrasto dal titolo ‘Povertà in attesa’, Rome: Caritas.Google Scholar
Caritas Migrantes (1993) Dossier Immigrazione. Anno 1993, Rome: Caritas.Google Scholar
Cartocci, R. (2011) Geografia dell’Italia cattolica, Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Ceccarini, L. (2010) ‘The Church in opposition: religious actors, lobbying and the Catholic voters in Italy’, in Haynes, J., (ed.), Religion and Politics in Europe, the Middle-East and Africa, London: Routledge, 177–201.Google Scholar
Chiesa, Cattolica (2020) Diocesi e Parrocchie, https://www.chiesacattolica.it/annuario-cei/regioni-diocesi-e-parrocchie/ [accessed 02.03.2020].Google Scholar
Colozzi, I. (2012) ‘Religione, valori e welfare state: il caso italiano’, Sociologia e Politiche Sociali, 3: 45–73.Google Scholar
David, P. (1984) ‘Il sistema assistenziale in Italia,’ in Ascoli, U. (ed.), Welfare State all’italiana, Bari: Laterza: 185–205.Google Scholar
Eurostat (2020) Eurostat Online Database, https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/data/database, [accessed 10.06.2020].Google Scholar
Fargion, V. (1997) Geografia della cittadinanza sociale in Italia, Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Grzymala-Busse, A. (2015) Nations under God, Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guillén, A. M. and Pavolini, E. (2015) ‘Welfare states under strain in Southern Europe: overview of the special issue‘, European Journal of Social Security, 2, 147–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Istat (2020) I.stat Online Database, http://dati.istat.it/ [accessed 05.06.2020].Google Scholar
Itçaina, X. (2014) ‘Catholicism, social economy and local welfare in times of crisis: comparing Spanish and Italian territories’, EUI Working Papers.Google Scholar
Jessoula, M. and Madama, I. (eds.) (2018) Fighting Poverty and Social Exclusion in the EU: A Chance in Europe 2020, London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kazepov, Y. (2015) ‘Italian social assistance in the European context’, in Ascoli, U. and Pavolini, E. (eds), The Italian Welfare State in European Perspective: A Comparative Analysis, Bristol, Policy Press, 101–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kazepov, Y. (2008) ‘The subsidiarization of social policies: actors, processes and impacts. Some reflections on the Italian case from a European perspective’, European Societies, 10, 2, 247–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
La Bella, G. (2007) Pedro Arrupe. Un uomo per gli altri, Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Madama, I. (2010) Le politiche di assistenza sociale, Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Manow, P. (2015) ‘Workers, farmers and Catholicism: a history of political class coalitions and the south-European welfare state regime’, 25, 1, 32–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manow, P. and Van Kersbergen, K. (eds.) (2009) Religion, Class Coalitions, and Welfare States, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Manuel, P. C. and Glatzer, M. (eds.) (2019) ‘Faith-Based Organizations and Social Welfare. Associational Life and Religion in Contemporary Western Europe’, London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Marzano, M. and Pace, E. (2013) ‘Introduction: the many faces of Italian Catholicism in the 21st century’, Social Compass, 60, 3, 299–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pavolini, E. (2003) Le nuove politiche sociali. I sistemi di Welfare fra istituzioni e società civile, Bologna, Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Pavolini, E., Béland, D. and Jawad, R. (2017) ‘Mapping the relationship between religion and social policy’, Journal of International and Comparative Social Policy, 33, 3, 240–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pavolini, E., León, M., Guillén, A. M. and Ascoli, U. (2015) ‘From austerity to permanent strain? The EU and welfare state reform in Italy and Spain’, Comparative European Politics, 13, 1, 56–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peker, E. (2020) ‘Right-wing populism and the securitisation of laïcité narratives in French education policy’, Social Policy and Society, doi: 10.1017/S1474746420000652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pierson, P. (1996) ‘The new politics of the welfare state’, World Politics, 48, 2, 143–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pope Francis (2020) Letter to our Brothers and Sisters of Popular Movements and Organizations, Vatican City, Easter Sunday, 12 April.Google Scholar