Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T17:30:00.962Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Introduction: Rethinking Welfare-to-Work for the Long-Term Unemployed

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 September 2019

Michael McGann ,
Sophie Danneris  and
Siobhan O’Sullivan
Michael McGann*
Affiliation:
School of Social and Political Sciences, University of Melbourne E-mail: [email protected]
Sophie Danneris*
Affiliation:
Department of Sociology and Social Work, Aalborg University E-mail: [email protected]
Siobhan O’Sullivan*
Affiliation:
School of Social Sciences, University of New South Wales E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Themed Section: Rethinking Welfare-to-Work for the Long-Term Unemployed
Information
Social Policy and Society , Volume 18 , Issue 4 , October 2019 , pp. 577 - 582
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Andersen, N. A., Caswell, D. and Larsen, F. (2017) ‘A new approach to helping the hard-to-place unemployed: the promise of developing new knowledge in an interactive and collaborative process’, European Journal of Social Security, 19, 4, 335–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brodkin, E. Z. (2011) ‘Policy work: street-level organisations under new managerialism’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21, i253–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brodkin, E. Z. (2013) ‘Work and the welfare state’, in Brodkin, E. Z. and Marston, G. (eds.), Work and the Welfare State: Street-Level Organisations and Workfare Policies, Copenhagen: DJOF Publishing, 3–16.Google Scholar
Carter, E. and Whitworth, A. (2015) ‘Creaming and parking in quasi-marketised welfare-to-work schemes: designed out of or designed into the UK Work Programme?’, Journal of Social Policy, 44, 2, 277–96.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Caswell, D. and Høybye-Mortensen, M. (2015) ‘Responses from the frontline: how organisations and street-level bureaucrats deal with economic sanctions’, European Journal of Social Security, 1, 1, 31–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caswell, D. and Larsen, F. (2017) ‘Frontline work in Danish activation policies’, in van Berkel, R., Caswell, D., Kupka, P. and Larsen, F. (eds.), Frontline Delivery of Welfare-to-Work Policies in Europe, New York: Routledge, 163–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Considine, M., Lewis, J. M., O’Sullivan, S. and Sol, E. (2015) Getting Welfare to Work: Street-Level Governance in Australia, the UK, and the Netherlands, New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Considine, M., O’Sullivan, S. and Nguyen, P. (2018) ‘The policymaker’s dilemma: the risks and benefits of a ‘black box’ approach to commissioning active labour market programmes’, Social Policy and Administration, 52, 1, 229–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dean, H. (2003) ‘Re-conceptualising welfare-to-work for people with multiple problems and needs’, Journal of Social Policy, 32, 3, 441–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuertes, V. and Lindsay, C. (2015) ‘Personalisation and street-level practice in activation: the case of the UK’s Work Programme’, Public Administration, 94, 2, 526–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDonald, C. and Marston, G. (2005) ‘Workfare as welfare: governing unemployment in the advanced liberal state’, Critical Social Policy, 25, 3, 374–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mead, L. (1997) The New Paternalism: Supervisory Approaches to Poverty, Washington: Brookings Institute.Google Scholar
Patrick, R. (2017) ‘Whither social citizenship? Lived experiences of citizenship in/exclusion for recipients of out-of-work benefits’, Social Policy and Society, 16, 2, 293–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rice, D. (2012) ‘Street-level bureaucrats and the welfare state: toward a micro-institutionalist theory of policy implementation’, Administration and Society, 45, 9, 1038–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rice, D. (2017) ‘How governance conditions affect the individualisation of active labour market services: an exploratory vignette study’, Public Administration, 95, 468–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soss, J., Fording, R. C. and Schram, S. F. (2011) Disciplining the Poor: Neoliberal Paternalism and the Persistent Power of Race, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Berkel, R. (2013) ‘Triple activation: introducing welfare-to-work into Dutch social assistance’, in Brodkin, E. Z. and Marston, G. (eds.), Work and the Welfare State: Street-Level Organisations and Workfare Policies, Copenhagen: DJOF Publishing, 87–102.Google Scholar
van Berkel, R. (2014) ‘Quasi-markets and the delivery of activation: a frontline perspective’, Social Policy and Administration, 48, 2, 188–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitworth, A. and Carter, E. (2014) ‘Welfare-to-work reform, power and inequality: from governance to governmentalities’, Journal of Contemporary European Studies, 22, 2, 104–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar