Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T23:53:16.545Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Imaginary Homelessness Prevention with Prison Leavers in Wales

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 November 2019

Iolo Madoc-Jones ,
Anya Ahmed ,
Caroline Hughes ,
Sarah Dubberley ,
Caro Gorden ,
Karen Washington-Dyer ,
Kelly Lockwood  and
Mark Wilding
Iolo Madoc-Jones
Affiliation:
Wrexham Glyndŵr University E-mail: [email protected]
Anya Ahmed
Affiliation:
University of Salford E-mail: [email protected]
Caroline Hughes
Affiliation:
Wrexham Glyndŵr University E-mail: [email protected]
Sarah Dubberley
Affiliation:
Wrexham Glyndŵr University E-mail: [email protected]
Caro Gorden
Affiliation:
Wrexham Glyndŵr University E-mail: [email protected]
Karen Washington-Dyer
Affiliation:
Wrexham Glyndŵr University E-mail: [email protected]
Kelly Lockwood
Affiliation:
University of Salford E-mail: [email protected]
Mark Wilding
Affiliation:
University of Salford E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this article we engage in a critical examination of how local authority Housing Solutions staff, newly placed centre stage in preventing homelessness amongst prison leavers in Wales, understand and go about their work. Drawing on Carlen’s concept of ‘imaginary penalities’ and Ugelvik’s notion of ‘legitimation work’ we suggest practice with this group can be ritualistic and underpinned by a focus on prison leavers’ responsibilities over their rights, and public protection over promoting resettlement. In response we advocate for less-punitive justice and housing policies, underpinned by the right to permanent housing for all prison leavers and wherein stable accommodation is understood as the starting point for resettlement. The analysis presented in this article provides insights to how homelessness policies could play out in jurisdictions where more joint working between housing and criminal justice agencies are being pursued and/or preventative approaches to managing homelessness are being considered.

Keywords

Prisonhomelessnessresettlementhousingprevention
Type
Themed Section: Homelessness Prevention in an International Policy Context
Information
Social Policy and Society , Volume 19 , Issue 1 , January 2020 , pp. 145 - 155
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ahmed, A. and Madoc-Jones, I. (2019) ‘Introduction: homelessness prevention in an international policy context’, Social Policy and Society, doi: 10.1017/S1474746419000393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alden, S. (2015) ‘On the frontline: the gatekeeper in statutory homelessness services’, Housing Studies, 30, 6, 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bibbings, J. (2012) Policy Briefing: Homeless Ex-offenders in Wales, 2010/11, Shelter Cymru, https://sheltercymru.org.uk/what-we-do/policy-and-research/policy-briefing-ex-offenders [accessed 01.08.2019].Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P. (1991) Language and Symbolic Power, Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Canton, R. (2010) ‘Taking probation abroad’, European Journal of Probation, 1, 1, 66–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlen, P. (2013) Imaginary Penalities, London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clinks Briefing (2017) Are the Accommodation Needs Being Met for People in Contact With the Criminal Justice System?, https://www.clinks.org/sites/default/files/basic/files-downloads/accommodation_for_people_in_contact_with_the_cjs-_feb_2017.pdf [accessed 05.04.2019].Google Scholar
Connell, A., Martin, S. and Denny, E. (2017) ‘How can subnational governments deliver their policy objectives in the age of austerity? Reshaping homelessness policy in Wales’, Political Quarterly, 88, 3, 443–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, V. (2013) ‘No fixed abode: the continuum of policing and incarcerating the homeless’, Policing: A Journal of Policy and Practice, 11, 1, 29–38.Google Scholar
Cooper, V. (2016) ‘It’s all considered to be ‘unacceptable behaviour’: criminal justice practitioners’ experience of statutory housing duty for (ex) offenders’, Probation Journal, 63, 4, 433–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cowan, D., Pantazis, C. and Gilroy, R. (2001) ‘Social housing as crime control: an examination of the role of housing management in policing sex offenders’, Social and Legal Studies, 10, 4, 435–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crawford, A. (2003) ‘Contractual governance of deviant behaviour’, Journal of Law and Society, 30, 4, 479–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dwyer, P., Bowpitt, G., Sundin, E. and Weinstein, M. (2014) ‘Rights, responsibilities and refusals: Homelessness policy and the exclusion of single homeless people with complex needs’, Critical Social Policy, 35, 1, 1–21.Google Scholar
Feeley, M. and Simon, J. (1994) ‘Actuarial justice: the emerging new criminal law’, in Nelken, D. (ed.), The Futures of Criminology, London: Sage.Google Scholar
Fitzpatrick, S., Pawson, H., Bramley, G., Wilcox, S. and Watts, B. (2016) The Homeless Monitor: England 2016, https://www.crisis.org.uk/media/236829/the_homelessness_monitor_england_2016_es.pdf [accessed 09.09.2019].Google Scholar
Flint, J. and Nixon, J. (2006) ‘Governing neighbours: anti-social behaviour orders and new forms of regulating conduct in the UK’, Urban Studies, 43, 5-6, 939–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garland, D. (1997) ‘Governmentality’ and the problem of crime’, Theoretical Criminology, 1, 2, 173–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gojkovic, D., Mills, A. and Meek, R. (2012) Accommodation for Ex-offenders: Third Sector Housing Advice and Provision. Third Sector Research Centre, https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/337980/1/WP77_Accommodation_for_ex-offenders_-_Gojkovic%252C_Mills_and_Meek%252C_March_2012%255B1%255D.pdf [accessed 09.09.2019].Google Scholar
Grierson, J. (2019) ‘Abolish prison terms of under a year to ease safety crisis say MPs’, The Guardian, 3 April.Google Scholar
Harvie, P. and Manzi, T. (2011) ‘Interpreting multi-agency partnerships: ideology, discourse and domestic violence’, Social and Legal Studies, 20, 1, 79–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
House of Commons (2017) UK Prison Population Statistics 20 April 2017, London: House of Commons.Google Scholar
Humphreys, C. and Sterling, T. (2008) ‘Necessary but not Sufficient: Housing and the reduction of re-offending. Welsh Local Government Association’, Cardiff; Welsh local Government Association.Google Scholar
Kemshall, H. and Maguire, M. (2001) ‘Public protection, partnership and risk penality: the multi-agency risk management of sexual and violent offenders’, Punishment and Society, 3, 2, 237–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lidstone, P. (1994) ‘Rationing housing to the homeless applicant’, Housing Studies, 9, 4, 459–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackie, P. (2008) This Time Round: Exploring the Effectiveness of Current Interventions in the Housing of Homeless Prisoners Released to Wales’, Swansea: Shelter Cymru.Google Scholar
Madoc-Jones, I., Gorden, C., Hughes, C., Dubberley, S. and Washington-Dyer, K. (2019) ‘Rethinking homelessness amongst prison leavers’, European Journal of Probation, 10, 3, 215–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Madoc-Jones, I., Hughes, C., Dubberley, S., Gorden, C., Washington-Dyer, K., Wilson, F., Ahmed, A., Lockwood, K. and Wilding, M. (2018) Evaluation of Homelessness Services to Adults in the Secure Estate (Wales) Final Report, Cardiff: Welsh Assembly Government.Google Scholar
Maguire, M. and Raynor, P. (2006) ‘How the resettlement of prisoners promotes desistance from crime: or does it?’, Criminology and Criminal Justice, 6, 1, 19–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ministry of Justice (2012) Accommodation, Homelessness and Reoffending of Prisoners: Results from the Surveying Prisoner Crime Reduction (SPCR) Survey, London: Ministry of Justice.Google Scholar
Ministry of Justice (2019) Published Response to Revolving Door Agency (2019) FOI 180915001, https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/homelessness_on_release_from_pri#incoming-124060 [accessed 10.06.2019].Google Scholar
Nash, M. and Walker, L. (2009) ‘Mappa – is closer collaboration really the key to effectiveness?’ Policing, 3, 2, 172–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Audit Office (2017) Homelessness, London: National Audit Office https://www.nao.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/Homelessness.pdf [accessed 19.12.2019].Google Scholar
Sibley, D. (1995) Geographies of Exclusion, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Simon, J. (2007) Governing through Crime: How the War on Crime Transformed American Democracy and Created a Culture of Fear, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Social Exclusion Unit (2002) Reducing Reoffending by Ex-Prisoners, London: Social Exclusion Unit.Google Scholar
Stephens, M. and Stephenson, A. (2016) ‘Housing policy in the austerity age and beyond’, in Fenger, M., Hudson, J. and Needham, C. (eds.), Social Policy Review: Analysis and Debate in Social Policy, Bristol: Policy Press, 63–85.Google Scholar
Ugelvik, T. (2016) ‘Techniques of legitimation: the narrative construction of legitimacy among immigration detention officers’, Crime, Media, Culture, 1, 2, 215–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wakefield, A. (2003) Selling Security: The Private Policing of Public Space, Cullompton: Wilan.Google Scholar
Welsh Government (2015) The National Pathway for Providing Services to Children, Young People and Adults in the Secure Estate, Cardiff: Welsh Government.Google Scholar
Welsh Government (2017) National Rough Sleeper Count November 2016-Experimental Statistics, Cardiff: Welsh Government http://gov.wales/docs/statistics/2017/170201-national-rough-sleeper-count-november-2016-experimental-statistics-en.pdf [accessed 02.03.2019].Google Scholar
White, A. (2013) ‘The shadow state: probation chiefs voice doubts about outsourcing’, New Statesman, 7 January.Google Scholar