Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-04T19:00:37.594Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

How Effective Are Cash Transfers in Reducing Poverty, Compared to Remittances?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 February 2015

Jessica Hagen-Zanker  and
Carmen Leon Himmelstine
Jessica Hagen-Zanker
Affiliation:
Overseas Development Institute, London E-mail: [email protected]
Carmen Leon Himmelstine
Affiliation:
School of Global Studies, University of Sussex E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Using a rigorous, evidence-focused review method, this literature review found eleven relevant studies that directly compare the impacts of cash transfers and remittances on a range indicators of poverty at the household level. The evidence base is small and highly context specific. The external and internal validity of most studies are limited, so the conclusions that can be drawn from this review are tentative. However, in the majority of studies both cash transfers and remittances are shown to have positive impacts on reducing poverty. Overall, remittances seem to have stronger poverty-reducing impacts. There are a number of factors that seem to explain why remittances have a greater effect. In the studies reviewed here, remittances appear to reach both a greater share of the overall population than cash transfers and a greater share of poorer households. Furthermore, remittances were higher in value in the majority of studies reviewed. Further high-quality research is needed.

Keywords

Social protectionmigrationcash transfersremittancespoverty reduction
Type
Articles
Information
Social Policy and Society , Volume 15 , Issue 1 , January 2016 , pp. 29 - 42
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, R. H. (2005) Remittances, Household Expenditure and Investment in Guatemala, World Bank Working Paper 3532, Washington, DC: World Bank.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alderman, H. (1996) ‘Savings and economic shocks in rural Pakistan’, Journal of Development Economics, 51, 2, 343–65.Google Scholar
De Haas, H. (2005) ‘International migration, remittances and development: myths and facts’, Third World Quarterly, 26, 8, 1269–84.Google Scholar
Department for International Development (DFID) (2011) Cash Transfers Literature Review, London: Department for International Development.Google Scholar
Department for International Development (DFID) (2013) How to Note: Assessing the Strength of Evidence, London: Department for International Development.Google Scholar
Duflo, E. and Udry, C. (2004) Intrahousehold Resource Allocation in Cote d’Ivoire: Social Norms, Separate Accounts and Consumption, NBER Working Paper No. 10498, Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
Farrington, J. and Slater, R. (2006) ‘Introduction: cash transfers: panacea for poverty reduction or money down the drain?’, Development Policy Review, 24, 5, 499–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fiszbein, A., Schady, N. and Ferreira, F. (2009) Conditional Cash Transfers: Reducing Present and Future Poverty, Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
Giannetti, M., Federici, D. and Raitano, M. (2009) ‘Migrant remittances and inequality in Central-Eastern Europe’, International Review of Applied Economics, 23, 3, 289–307.Google Scholar
Hagen-Zanker, J. and Leon Himmelstine, C. (2013) ‘What do we know about the impact of social protection programmes on the decision to migrate?’, Migration and Development, 2, 1, 117–31.Google Scholar
Hagen-Zanker, J. and Mallett, R. (2013) How To Do A Rigorous, Evidence-Focused Literature Review In International Development: A Guidance Note, London: Overseas Development Institute.Google Scholar
Hagen-Zanker, J., McCord, A. and Holmes, R. (2011) Systematic Review on the Impact of Employment Guarantee Schemes and Cash Transfers on the Poor, London: Overseas Development Institute.Google Scholar
Hernandez, E., Sam, A. G., Gonzalez-Vega, C. and Chen, J. J. (2012) ‘Does the insurance effect of public and private transfers favor financial deepening? Evidence from rural Nicaragua’, Review of Development Finance, 2, 1, 9–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jensen, R. T. (2004) ‘Do private transfers “displace” the benefits of public transfers? Evidence from South Africa’, Journal of Public Economics, 88, 1, 89–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maitra, P. and Ray, R. (2003) ‘The effect of transfers on household expenditure patterns and poverty in South Africa’, Journal of Development Economics, 71, 1, 23–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCord, A. (2012) Public Works and Social Protection in Sub-Saharan Africa: Do Public Works Work for the Poor?, Tokyo: United Nations University Press.Google Scholar
McDade, Z. (2010) Are Conditions on Cash Transfers Necessary to Improve Rural Education Outcomes? Evidence from Nicaragua, Honors Project Paper 31, http://digitalcommons.macalester.edu/economics_honors_projects/31.Google Scholar
Murrugarra, E. (2002) ‘Public transfers and migrants’ remittances: evidence from the recent armenian experience’, World Bank Economists’ Forum, 2, 25–47.Google Scholar
Nyberg-Sørensen, N., Hear, N. V. and Engberg–Pedersen, P. (2002) ‘The migration-development nexus: evidence and policy options’, International Migration, 40, 5, 49–73.Google Scholar
Pfau, W. D. and Giang, L. T. (2009a) Remittances, Living Arrangements, and the Welfare of the Elderly in Viet Nam, Viet Nam Development Forum Working Paper 901, Hanoi: Viet Nam Development Forum.Google Scholar
Pfau, W. D. and Giang, L. T. (2009b) ‘Determinants and impacts of international remittances on household welfare in Vietnam’, International Social Science Journal, 60, 197–8, 431–43.Google Scholar
Pritchett, L. and Sandefur, J. (2013) Context Matters for Size: Why External Validity Claims and Development Practice Don't Mix, Working Paper 336, Washington, DC: Center for Global Development.Google Scholar
Samuels, F. and Jones, N. (2013) Holding Cash Transfers to Account: Beneficiary and Community Perspectives, London: Overseas Development Institute.Google Scholar
Sirkeci, I., Cohen, J. H. and Ratha, D. (eds.) (2012) Migration and Remittances during the Global Financial Crisis and Beyond, Washington, DC: World BankCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slater, R. and Farrington, J. (2009) Cash Transfers: Targeting, ODI Project Briefing No. 27, London: Overseas Development Institute.Google Scholar
Skeldon, R. (2008) ‘International migration as a tool in development policy: a passing phase?’, Population and Development Review, 34, 1, 1–18.Google Scholar
Slater, R. and Mphale, M. (2008) Cash Transfers, Gender and Generational Relations: Evidence from a Pilot Project in Lesotho, London: Overseas Development Institute.Google Scholar
Stark, O. and Taylor, J. E. (1991) ‘Migration incentives, migration types: the role of relative deprivation’, The Economic Journal, 101, 408, 1163–78.Google Scholar
Tesliuc, E. and Lindert, K. (2002) Social Protection, Private Transfers and Poverty: A Quantitative and Qualitative Assessment. Guatemala Poverty Assessment Report, Technical Background Paper, Washington, DC: The World Bank.Google Scholar
Van den Berg, M. and Cuong, N. V. (2011) ‘Impact of public and private cash transfers on poverty and inequality: evidence from Vietnam’, Development Policy Review, 29, 6, 689–728.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
World Bank (1999) Poverty and Social Development in Peru, 1994–1997, Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
World Bank (2010) Migration and Remittances Factbook 2011, Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
World Bank (2013) Migration and Development Brief, Washington, DC: Migration and Remittances Unit, Development Prospects Group, World Bank.Google Scholar
Yang, D. (2008) ‘International Migration, Remittances and Household Investment: Evidence from Philippine Migrants’ Exchange Rate Shocks’, The Economic Journal, 118, 528, 591–630.Google Scholar