Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T09:16:04.046Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Disciplining ‘Problem Parents’ in the Youth Court: Between Regulation and Resistance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 December 2009

Amanda Holt
Amanda Holt*
Affiliation:
University of Portsmouth E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper explores the ways in which parents, who have been the recipients of Parenting Orders, perform identity work through their accounts of their experiences in court. Discourse analysis is used to identify five key ‘strategies of resistance’ through which parents manage their parental identity and argues that such discursive practices highlight the fragility of such parents' claims to a positive parental identity in light of hegemonic gendered and classed conceptions of ‘responsible parenting’. The paper concludes by reflecting on what such practices might mean for parents who find themselves at once both regulated and resistant.

Type
Themed section on Disciplining Difference
Information
Social Policy and Society , Volume 9 , Issue 1 , January 2010 , pp. 89 - 99
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arthur, R. (2005), ‘Punishing parents for the crimes of their children’, Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 44, 3, 233–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruner, J. S. (1990), Acts of Meaning, London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Burman, E. (1996), ‘Psychology, discourse, practice: from regulation to resistance’, in Burman, E., Aitken, G., Alldred, P., Allwood, R., Billington, T., Goldberg, B., Gordo Lopez, A. J., Heenan, C., Marks, D. and Warner, S. (eds.), Psychology, Discourse, Practice: From Regulation to Resistance, Abingdon: Taylor & Francis, pp. 1–14.Google Scholar
Burman, E. and Parker, I. (1993), Discourse Analytic Research: Repertoires ad Readings of Text in Action, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Burnett, R. and Appleton, C. (2004)a, ‘Joined-up services to tackle youth crime’, British Journal of Criminology, 44, 1, 34–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burnett, R. and Appleton, C. (2004)b, Joined-Up Youth Justice: Tackling Youth Crime in Partnership, Lyne Regis: Russell House.Google Scholar
Burney, E. and Gelsthorpe, L. (2008), ‘Do we need a naughty step? Rethinking the parenting order after ten years’, Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 47, 5, 470–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crewe, B. (2007), ‘Power, adaptation and resistance in a late-modern men's prison’, British Journal of Criminology, 47, 256–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Department for Children, Schools and Families (2008), ‘Youth crime action plan’, DCSF, London, available from: http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/documents/youth-crime-action-plan/youth-crime-action-plan-08?view=Binary, accessed 19 September 2008.Google Scholar
Donzelot, J. (1979), The Policing of Families, London: Hutchinson.Google Scholar
Ellis, T. and Boden, I. (2004, July 2004), ‘Is there a unifying professional culture in Youth Offending Teams? A research note’, Proceedings for the British Society of Criminology Annual Conference 2004, Institute of Criminal Justice Studies (ICJS), University of Portsmouth.Google Scholar
Fegan, E. (1999), ‘“Subjects” of regulation/resistance? Postmodern feminism and agency in abortion decision-making’, Feminist Legal Studies, 7, 3, 241–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foucault, M. (1975/91), Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison, London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Ghate, D. and Ramella, M. (2002), ‘Positive parenting: the national evaluation of the Youth Justice Board's Parenting Programme’, Policy Research Bureau, available at http://www.youth-justice-board.gov.uk, accessed 12 December 2005.Google Scholar
Garland, D. (2001), The Culture of Control: Crime and Social Order in Contemporary Society, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gillies, V. (2006), Marginalised Mothers: Exploring Working Class Experiences of Parenting, Abingdon: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldson, B. (2004), ‘Youth crime and youth justice’, in Muncie, J.W. and Wilson, D. (eds.), Student Handbook of Criminal Justice and Criminology, London: Cavendish, pp. 221–34.Google Scholar
Goldson, B. (2005), ‘Taking liberties: policy and the punitive turn’, in Hendrick, H. (ed.), Child Welfare and Social Policy: An Essential Reader, Bristol: Policy Press, pp. 255–67.Google Scholar
Goldson, B. and Jamieson, J. (2002), ‘Youth crime, the “parenting deficit” and state intervention: a contextual critique’, Youth Justice, 2, 2, 92–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffin, C. (1993), Representations of Youth, Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Holt, A. (2008), ‘“Room for resistance? Parenting Orders, disciplinary power and the construction of the bad parent’, in Squires, P. (ed.), ASBO Nation: The Criminalisation of Nuisance, Bristol: Policy Press, pp. 203–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holt, A. (2009), ‘(En)gendering responsibilities: experiences of parenting a “young offender”’, The Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 48 (4), 344–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
IMD (2000), ‘Department of Environment, Transport and Regions (DETR) 2000 Indices of Deprivation 2000. London: HMSO 2000.Google Scholar
Jensen, T. (2008), ‘Expertise and the remaking of parental subjectivities’, Paper presented at the Subjectivity: International Conference in Critical Psychology, Cultural Studies and Social Theory, 27–29 June 2008, Cardiff School of Social Sciences, University of Wales, Cardiff.Google Scholar
Lawler, S. (1999), ‘Children need but mothers only want: the power of “needs talk” in the constitution of childhood’, in Seymour, J. and Bagguley, P. (eds.), Relating Intimacies: Power and Resistance, Basingstoke: Macmillan, pp. 64–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linde, C. (1993), Life Stories: The Creation of Coherence, New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindfield, S. (2001), Responses to Questionnaire: Parenting Work in the Youth Justice Context, Brighton: Trust for the Study of Adolescence.Google Scholar
Longstaff, E. (2004), Good Enough Parenting? Youth Crime and Parental Responsibility, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mann, K. and Roseneil, S. (1994), ‘Some mothers do ‘ave ‘em: backlash and the gender politics of the underclass debate’, Journal of Gender Studies, 3, 3, 317–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, R. and Russell, N. (2000), ‘The judiciary in the Magistrates’ courts’, Home Office, available at http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/rds/pdfs/occ-judiciary.pdf, accessed 14 June 2007.Google Scholar
NACRO (2004), Parenting Provision in a Youth Justice Context, London: NACRO.Google Scholar
Office of the Deputy Prime Minister (2007), Indices of Deprivation for Wards (2000), London: ODPM.Google Scholar
Reissman, C. (1993), Narrative Analysis, London: Sage.Google Scholar
Ribbens McCarthy, J., Edwards, R. and Gillies, V. (2000), ‘Moral tales of the child and the adult: narratives of contemporary family lives under changing circumstances’, Sociology, 34, 4, 785–803.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ricoeur, P. (1991), ‘Narrative identity’, Philosophy Today, 35, 1, 73–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skeggs, B. (2004), ‘Exchange value and affect: Bourdieu and the self’, in Adkins, L. and Skeggs, B. (eds.), Feminism after Bourdieu, Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 75–97.Google Scholar
Skeggs, B. (2005), ‘The making of class and gender through visualizing moral subject formation’, Sociology, 39, 5, 965–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Souhami, A. (2007), Transforming Youth Justice: Occupational Identity and Cultural Change, London: Willan.Google Scholar
Tyler, I. (2008), ‘“Chav Scum Chav Mum” Class disgust in contemporary Britain’, Feminist Media Studies, 8, 1, 17–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walters, R. and Woodward, R. (2007), ‘Punishing “poor parents”: “respect”, “responsibility” and parenting orders in Scotland’, Youth Justice, 7, 1, 5–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar