Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T11:21:46.726Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

‘A Veritable Mountain of Data and Years of Endless Statistical Manipulation’: Methods in the Three Worlds and After

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 December 2014

Armando Barrientos
Armando Barrientos*
Affiliation:
Brooks World Poverty Institute, School of Environment, Education, and Development, University of Manchester E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article assesses the methodological contribution of Esping-Andersen's Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism to welfare regime analysis. It revisits the methods deployed in the Three Worlds and assesses their influence on the practice of welfare regime researchers. It finds that welfare regime researchers have embraced the methods presented in the Three Worlds in a piecemeal fashion. Data reduction techniques, such as cluster and latent variable techniques, compete with index construction as the tools of choice for identifying clusters. Although regression analysis has been used extensively in linking welfare programme design and outcomes with welfare regimes, few researchers have followed Esping-Andersen in employing regression analysis in the context of linking policy and politics. Qualitative comparative analysis methods are increasingly employed by welfare regime researchers as an alternative. Finally, the article considers the methodological implications associated with extending welfare regime analysis globally.

Keywords

Welfare regimemethodologywelfare institutionscomparative analysis
Type
Themed Section on Twenty Five Years of the Welfare Modelling Business
Information
Social Policy and Society , Volume 14 , Issue 2 , April 2015 , pp. 259 - 270
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abu Sharkh, M. and Gough, I. (2010) ‘Global welfare regimes: a cluster analysis’, Global Social Policy, 10, 1, 27–58.Google Scholar
Amenta, E. and Hicks, A. (2010) ‘Research methods’, in Castles, F. G., Liebfried, S. and Lewis, J. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of the Welfare State, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 105–20.Google Scholar
Arts, W. A. and Gelissen, J. (2002) ‘Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism or more? A state-of-the-art report’, Journal of European Social Policy, 12, 2, 137–58.Google Scholar
Bambra, C. (2006) ‘Decommodification and the Worlds of Welfare revisited’, Journal of European Social Policy, 16, 1, 73–80.Google Scholar
Beck, N. and Katz, J. N. (1995) ‘What to do (and not to do) with time series cross-section data’, American Political Science Review, 89, 3, 634–47.Google Scholar
Castles, F. G. and Mitchell, D. (1992) ‘Identifying welfare state regimes: the links between politics, instruments and outcomes’, Governance: An International Journal of Policy and Administration, 5, 1, 1–26.Google Scholar
Castles, F. G. and Mitchell, D. (1993) ‘Worlds of welfare and families of nations’, in Castles, F. G. (ed.), Families of Nations: Patterns of Public Policy in Western Democracies, Aldershot: Darmouth, pp. 93–128.Google Scholar
Ebbinghaus, B. (2012) ‘Comparing welfare state regimes: are typologies an ideal or realistic strategy?’, mimeo, University of Mannheim.Google Scholar
Esping-Andersen, G. (1990) The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism, Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Esping-Andersen, G. (1999) Social Foundations of Postindustrial Economies, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Esping-Andersen, G. (2007) ‘Multiple regression in small-N comparisons’, Comparative Social Research, 24, 1, 335–42.Google Scholar
Ferragina, E. and Seeleib-Kaiser, M. (2011) ‘Welfare regime debate: past, present, futures?’, Policy and Politics, 39, 4, 583–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gelissen, J. (2000) ‘Popular support for institutionalised solidarity: a comparison between European welfare states’, International Journal of Social Welfare, 9, 4, 285–300.Google Scholar
Gough, I. (2001) ‘Social assistance regimes: a cluster analysis’, Journal of European Social Policy, 11, 2, 165–70.Google Scholar
Gough, I. and Abu Sharkh, M. (2011) ‘Financing welfare regimes: mapping hetergeneous revenue structures’, International Journal of Social Welfare, 20, 3, 280–91.Google Scholar
Gough, I. and Wood, G. (2004) Insecurity and Welfare Regimes in Asia, Africa and Latin America, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Haggard, S. and Kaufman, R. R. (2008) Development, Democracy and Welfare States: Latin America, Asia and Eastern Europe, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Hemerijck, A. (2013) Changing Welfare States, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Huber, E. and Stephens, J. D. (2012) Democracy and the Left in Latin America: Social Policy and Inequality in Latin America, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hudson, J. and Kühner, S. (2009) ‘Towards productive welfare? A comparative analysis of 23 OECD countries’, Journal of European Social Policy, 19, 1, 34–46.Google Scholar
Jaeger, M. M. (2006) ‘Welfare regimes and attitudes towards redistribution: the regime hypothesis revisited’, European Sociological Review, 22, 2, 157–70.Google Scholar
Kangas, O. (1994) ‘The politics of social security: on regressions, qualitative comparisons, and cluster analysis’, in Janoski, T. and Hicks, A. M. (eds.), The Comparative Political Economy of the Welfare State, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 346–64.Google Scholar
Kim, K-T. (2014) ‘From worlds to cases: case selection and “other worlds” in the welfare modelling business’, Social Policy and Society, forthcoming.Google Scholar
Kittel, B. (2006) ‘A crazy methodology? On the limits of macro-quantitative social science research’, International Sociology, 21, 5, 647–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korpi, W. (1980) ‘Social policy and the distributional conflict in the capitalist democracies: a preliminary comparative framework’, West European Politics, 3, 3, 296–316.Google Scholar
Kuhn, Thomas S. (1970) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 2nd edn, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Larsen, C. A. (2008) ‘The institutional logic of welfare attitudes – how welfare regimes influence public support’, Comparative Political Studies, 41, 2, 145–68.Google Scholar
Martinez Franzoni, J. (2008) ‘Welfare regimes in Latin America: capturing constellations of markets, families, and policies’, Latin American Politics and Society, 50, 2, 67–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Obinger, H. and Wagschal, U. (2001) ‘Families of nations and public policy’, West European Politics, 24, 1, 99–113.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pitruzzello, S. (1999) ‘Decommodification and the worlds of welfare capitalism: a cluster analysis, mimeo, European University Institute.Google Scholar
Plümper, T., Troeger, V. E. and Manow, P. (2005) ‘Panel data analysis in comparative politics: linking method to theory’, European Journal of Political Research, 44, 2, 327–54.Google Scholar
Powell, M. and Barrientos, A. (2004) ‘Welfare regimes and the welfare mix’, European Journal of Political Research, 43, 1, 83–105.Google Scholar
Pribble, J. (2011) ‘Worlds apart: social policy regimes in Latin America’, Studies in Comparative International Development, 46, 1, 191–216.Google Scholar
Ragin, C. (1994) ‘Introduction to qualitative comparative analysis’, in Janoski, T. and Hicks, A. M. (eds.), The Comparative Political Economy of the Welfare State, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 299–315.Google Scholar
Rudra, N. (2007) ‘Welfare states in developing countries: unique or universal?’, The Journal of Politics, 69, 2, 378–96.Google Scholar
Scruggs, L. (2007) ‘Welfare state generosity across space and time’, in Siegal, N. and Clasen, J. (eds.), Welfare Reform in Advanced Societies: The Dependent Variable Problem in Comparative Welfare State Analysis, London: Edward Elgar, pp. 133–65.Google Scholar
Scruggs, L. (2014) Social Welfare Generosity Scores in CWED 2: A Methodological Genealogy, CWED Working Paper, Storrs, CT: University of Connecticut.Google Scholar
Scruggs, L. and Allan, J. (2006) ‘Welfare-state decommodification in 18 OECD countries: a replication and revision’, Journal of European Social Policy, 16, 1, 55–72.Google Scholar
Shalev, M. (2007) ‘Limits of and alternatives to multiple regression in comparative research’, Comparative Social Research, 24, 1, 261–308.Google Scholar
Svallfors, S. (1997) ‘Worlds of Welfare and attitudes to redistribution: a comparison of eight western nations’, European Sociological Review, 13, 3, 283–304.Google Scholar
Vis, B. (2012) ‘The comparative advantage of fsQCA and regression analysis for moderately large-N analysis’, Sociological Methods and Research, 41, 1, 168–98.Google Scholar
Vrooman, J. C. (2012) ‘Regimes and cultures of social security: comparing institutional models through nonlinear PCA’, International Journal of Comparative Sociology, 53, 5–6, 444–77.Google Scholar
Wildeboer Schut, J. M., Vrooman, J. C. and de Beer, P. T. (2001) On Worlds of Welfare: Institutions and Their Effects in Eleven Welfare States, The Hague: Social and Cultural Planning Office of the Netherlands.Google Scholar