Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T00:19:03.776Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Tackling Child Poverty Dynamics: Filling in Gaps in the Strategy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 October 2008

Noel Smith*
Affiliation:
Centre for Research in Social Policy, Loughborough University E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

Since announcing its ambitious pledge to eradicate child poverty, the Government's strategy has focused on providing extra income to families, particularly in terms of tax credits, and on increasing employment rates among parents. Recently, however, its strategy has developed to encompass a new emphasis on job retention, career progression and smoothing movement into and out of work, all of which should serve to safeguard and support children's movement out of poverty. With reference to poverty dynamics research, this article discusses why this new emphasis is crucial for reducing child poverty and highlights the possible future direction of developing policy in this light.

Type
Themed Section on The Poverty of Policy? Gaps in Anti-Poverty Policy for Children and Young People
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adelman, L., Middleton, S. and Ashworth, K. (2003), ‘Britain's poorest children: severe and persistent poverty and social exclusion’, Save the Children, London, http://www.savethechildren.org.uk/scuk_cache/scuk/cache/cmsattach/948_poorestchildren.pdfGoogle Scholar
Alcock, P. (2004), ‘The influence of dynamic perspectives on poverty analysis and anti-poverty policy in the UK’, Journal of Social Policy, 33, 3, 395416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berthoud, R., Bryan, M. and Bardasi, E. (2004), ‘The dynamics of deprivation: the relationship between income and material deprivation over time’, Research report no. 219, Department for Work and Pensions, London.Google Scholar
Bradbury, B., Jenkins, S.P. and Micklewright, J. (2001), ‘The dynamics of child poverty in seven industrialised nations’, in Bradbury, B., Jenkins, S.P. and Micklewright, J. (eds), The Dynamics of Child Poverty in Industrialised Countries, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
DWP (2006), ‘Opportunity for all: eighth annual report strategy document’, Department for Work and Pensions, Sheffield, http://www.dwp.gov.uk/ofa/reports/latest.aspGoogle Scholar
DWP (2007a), ‘Households below average income’, Department for Work and Pensions, London, http://www.dwp.gov.uk/asd/hbai.asp#Google Scholar
DWP (2007b), Low-income dynamics 1991–2005 (Great Britain), Department for Work and Pensions, London, http://www.dwp.gov.uk/asd/hbai/low_income/Low_income-dynamics_1991-2005.pdfGoogle Scholar
DWP (2007c), ‘What works for whom? A review of evidence and meta-analysis for the Department for Work and Pensions’, Research report no. 407, Department for Work and Pensions, Leeds.Google Scholar
DWP (2007d), ‘Data sharing can lead to faster, more efficient services’, Press Release 26 June, http://www.dwp.gov.uk/mediacentre/pressreleases/2007/jun/emp026-260607.aspGoogle Scholar
Evans, M., Eyre, J., Millar, J. and Sarre, S. (2005), ‘New deal for lone parents: second synthesis report of the national evaluation’, Research report number 157, Department for Work and Pensions, Bath, http://www.dwp.gov.uk/jad/2003/163_rep.pdf#Google Scholar
Harker, L. (2006), ‘Delivering on child poverty: what would it take?’, Department for Work and Pensions, London, http://www.dwp.gov.uk/publications/dwp/2006/harker/harker-full.pdfGoogle Scholar
Hill, M.S. and Jenkins, S.P. (2001), ‘Poverty among British children: chronic or transitory?’, in Bradbury, B., Jenkins, S.P. and Micklewright, J. (eds), The Dynamics of Child Poverty in Industrialised Countries, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hills, J. and Stewart, K. (2005), ‘Policies towards poverty, inequality and exclusion since 1997’, Joseph Rowntree Foundation, York, http://www.jrf.org.uk/knowledge/findings/socialpolicy/0015.aspGoogle Scholar
Hirsch, D. (2006), ‘What will it take to end child poverty? Firing on all cylinders’, Joseph Rowntree Foundation, York, http://www.jrf.org.uk/bookshop/eBooks/9781859355008.pdfGoogle Scholar
HMT (2008), ‘Ending child poverty: everybody's business’, HM Treasury, London, http://www.hm-treasury.gov.uk/media/3/F/bud08_childpoverty_1310.pdfGoogle Scholar
Jarvis, S. and Jenkins, S.P. (1996), ‘Changing places: income mobility and poverty dynamics in Britain, Essex’, ISER working paper 1996–19.Google Scholar
Jarvis, S. and Jenkins, S.P. (1997), ‘Low income dynamics in 1990s Britain’, Fiscal Studies, 18, 2, 123–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jenkins, S.P. and Rigg, J.A. (2001), ‘The dynamics of poverty in Britain’, Research report no. 157, Department for Work and Pensions, Leeds, http://www.dwp.gov.uk/asd/asd5/rrep157.aspGoogle Scholar
Jenkins, S.P., Schluter, C. and Wagner, G.G. (2000), ‘The dynamics of child poverty: Britain and Germany compared’, DIW discussion paper 233, Berlin, http://www.diw.de/deutsch/produkte/publikationen/diskussionspapiere/docs/papers/dp233.pdfGoogle Scholar
Jenkins, S.P., Schluter, C. and Wagner, G.G. (2001), ‘Child poverty in Britain and Germany’, Anglo-German Foundation for the Study of Industrial Society, London, http://www.agf.org.uk/pubs/pa2001.htmGoogle Scholar
Leitch, S. (2006), ‘Prosperity for all in the global economy: world class skills’, HM Treasury, London, http://www.hm-treasury.gov.uk/media/6/4/leitch_finalreport051206.pdfGoogle Scholar
Millar, J. (2007), ‘The dynamics of poverty and employment: the contribution of qualitative longitudinal research to understanding transitions, adaptations and trajectories’, Social Policy and Society, 6, 4, 533−44.Google Scholar
Muffels, R., Fourage, D. and Dekker, R. (2000), ‘Longitudinal poverty and income inequality: a com-parative panel study for the Netherlands, Germany and the UK’, OSA Working Paper, http://www.uvt.nl/osa/producten/wop/osawp6a.pdfCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nolan, N. and Maitre, B. (2004), ‘An overview of economic and social opportunities and disadvantages in European households’, in Chase-Lansdale, P.L., Kiernan, K. and Friedman, R.J. (eds), Human Development across Lives and Generations: The Potential for Change, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ruspini, E. (1999), ‘Lone mothers and poverty in Italy, Germany and Great Britain, Essex’, ISER working paper 1999–10, http://www.iser.essex.ac.uk/pubs/workpaps/pdf/1999-10.pdf#Google Scholar
Smith, N. and Middleton, S. (2007), ‘A review of poverty dynamics research in the UK’, Joseph Rowntree Foundation, York, http://www.jrf.org.uk/bookshop/eBooks/2040-poverty-dynamics-review.pdfGoogle Scholar
Strelitz, J. (2007), ‘Halfway house’, Save the Children, London, http://www.savethechildren.org.uk/en/docs/Halfway_house_briefing.pdfGoogle Scholar
Taylor, M. (2002), ‘Labour market transitions in the context of social exclusion: a study of the EU’, European Commission, Brussels, http://ec.europa.eu/employment_social/news/2002/nov/labmarket_trans_en.htmlGoogle Scholar
Vegeris, S. and Perry, J. (2003), ‘Families and children 2001: living standards and the children’, Research report No. 190, Department for Work and Pensions, Leeds, http://www.dwp.gov.uk/asd/asd5/rrep190.aspGoogle Scholar
Work and Pensions Committee (2004), Child Poverty in the UK: Second Report of Session 2003–04, London: House of Commons.Google Scholar
Work and Pensions Committee (2008), The Best Start in Life? Alleviating Deprivation, Improving Social Mobility and Eradicating Child Poverty, London: House of Commons.Google Scholar