Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T07:18:33.707Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Revisiting Global Welfare Regimes: Gender, (In)formal Employment and Care

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 September 2020

Antonios Roumpakis*
Affiliation:
Department of Social Policy and Social Work, University of York E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

Gender critiques of comparative welfare state research have so far predominantly focused on OECD countries but less so in countries across Africa, Asia and Latin America. Existing comparative social policy research in these regions often cites the importance of informal networks and family for social protection but less attention is paid into gender relations and their importance for the social reproduction of these welfare regimes. The article comparatively analyses gender differences in the sphere of production (captured by the gender gap in formal and informal employment) and social reproduction (captured by time spent on unpaid domestic work). The article identifies regional patterns and explores implications for women’s ability to access welfare and the labour market. Additionally, it shows that informal activities (employment, domestic work) are extensive among many African, Asian, Latin American, but also specific OECD, welfare regimes. The article contributes first by incorporating gender in the analysis of global welfare regime and second by highlighting the importance of informal relationships for the analysis of welfare regimes.

Type
Themed Section: Global Welfare Regimes Revisited
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abu Sharkh, M. and Gough, I. (2010) ‘Global welfare regimes: a cluster analysis’, Global Social Policy, 10, 2758.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amoah, P. (2020) ‘Examining attitudes towards welfare in an in/security regime: evidence from Ghana’, Social Policy and Society, doi: 10.1017/S1474746420000172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bakker, I. and Silvey, R. (2008) Beyond States and Markets: The Challenges of Social Reproduction, Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Benería, L., Berik, G. and Floro, M. S. (2015) Gender, Development and Globalization: Economics as if All People Mattered, New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Böger, T. and Öktem, K. G. (2019) ‘Levels or worlds of welfare? Assessing social rights and social stratification in Northern and Southern countries’, Social Policy and Administration, 53, 6377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Budlender, D. (2007) A Critical Review of Selected Time Use Surveys, United Nations Research Institute for Social Development.Google Scholar
Chau, R., Yu, S., Foster, L. and Lau, M. (2017) ‘Defamilisation measures and women’s labour force participation – a comparative study of twelve countries’, Journal of International and Comparative Social Policy, 33, 1, 7386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferrera, M. (2016) ‘Resemblances that matter: lessons from the comparison between Southern Europe and East Asia’, Journal of European Social Policy, 26, 4, 374–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franzoni, J. M. (2008) ‘Welfare regimes in Latin America: capturing constellations of markets, families, and policies’, Latin American Politics and Society, 50, 2, 67100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gough, I. (2004) ‘Welfare regimes in development contexts: a global and regional analysis’, in Gough, I. and Wood, G. (eds) with Barrientos, A., Bevan, P., Davis, P., and Room, G., Insecurity and Welfare Regimes in Asia, Africa and Latin America: Social Policy in Development Contexts, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gough, I. and Wood, G. (eds) with Barrientos, A., Bevan, P., Davis, P. and Room, G. (2004) Insecurity and Welfare Regimes in Asia, Africa, and Latin America Social Policy in Development Contexts, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hassim, S. and Razavi, S. (2006) ‘Gender and social policy in a global context: uncovering the gendered structure of ‘the Social”, in Razavi, S. (ed.), Gender and Social Policy in a Global Context: Uncovering the Gendered Structure of ‘The Social’, 167.Google Scholar
ILO (2008) Beyond Unemployment: Measurement of Other Forms of Labour Underutilization, 18th International Conference of Labour Statisticians Geneva, 24 November – 5 December.Google Scholar
ILO (2018) Women and Men in the Informal Economy: A Statistical Picture, 3rd edn, International Labour Office, Geneva.Google Scholar
Kabeer, N. (2015) ‘Gender, poverty, and inequality: a brief history of feminist contributions in the field of international development’, Gender and Development, 23, 2, 189205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karamessini, M. and Rubery, J. (2013) Women and Austerity: The Economic Crisis and the Future for Gender Equality, Abingdon and New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kühner, S. and Nakray, K. (2017) ‘India’s emerging social policy paradigm: productive, protective or what?, Journal of Asian Public Policy, 10, 1, 4056.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martínez Franzoni, J. and Sánchez-Ancochea, D. (2018) ‘Undoing segmentation? Latin American health care policy during the economic boom’, Social Policy and Administration, 52, 1181–200.Google Scholar
Midgley, J. (2019) ‘Social policy and development: an overview’, in Midgley, J., Surrender, R. and Alfers, L. (eds.), Handbook of Social Policy and Development, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 1434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Midtbøen, A. and Teigen, M. (2014) ‘Social investment in gender equality? Changing perspectives on work and welfare in Norway’, NORA - Nordic Journal of Feminist and Gender Research, 22, 4, 267–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mínguez, A. M. (2012) ‘Gender, family and care provision in developing countries: towards gender equality’, Progress in Development Studies 12, 275300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moser, C. (2012) Gender Planning and Development: Theory, Practice and Training, New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Papadopoulos, T. and Roumpakis, A. (2017) ‘Family as a socio-economic actor in the political economies of East and South-East Asian welfare capitalisms’, Social Policy and Administration, 51, 857–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Papadopoulos, T. and Roumpakis, A. (2019) ‘Family as a socio-economic actor in the political economy of welfare’, in Heins, E., Rees, J. and Needham, C. (eds.), Social Policy Review No 31, Bristol: Policy Press, 243–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patel, L. (2019) ‘Gender: towards gender equality and poverty reduction’, in Midgley, J., Surrender, R. and Alfers, L. (eds.), Handbook of Social Policy and Development, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 7188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rai, S., Brown, B. and Ruwanpura, K. (2019) ‘SDG 8: Decent work and economic growth – a gendered analysis, World Development, 113, 368–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Razavi, S. and Staab, S. (2012) Global Variations in the Political and Social Economy of Care: Worlds Apart, London: Routledge/UNRISD Research in Gender and Development.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roumpakis, A. (2020) ‘Revisiting Global Welfare Regime Classifications’, Social Policy & Society, 19, 4, 589–612.Google Scholar
Rudra, N. (2007) ‘Welfare state in developing countries: unique or universal?’, Journal of Politics, 69, 20, 378–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Surender, R. (2019) ‘The social policy nexus and development: convergence, divergence and dynamic change’, in Midgley, J., Surrender, R. and Alfers, L. (eds.), Handbook of Social Policy and Development, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 1434.Google Scholar
Tillin, L. and Duckett, J. (2017) ‘The politics of social policy: welfare expansion in Brazil, China, India and South Africa in comparative perspective’, Commonwealth and Comparative Politics, 55, 3, 253–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
United Nations (2020) SDG Global Indicators Database, https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/indicators/database/?indicator=5.4.1 [accessed 10.01.2020].Google Scholar
Wood, G. (2004) ‘Informal security regimes: the strength of relationships’, in Gough, I. and Wood, G. (eds.), with A. Barrientos, P. Bevan, P. Davis, and G. Room, Insecurity and Welfare Regimes in Asia, Africa and Latin America, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 4987.Google Scholar
Yörük, E., Öker, İ., Yildirim, K., and Yakut-Çakar, B. (2019) ‘The variable selection problem in the Three Worlds of Welfare literature’, Social Indicators Research, 144, 625–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar