Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T23:04:27.307Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Introduction: Vulnerability and Social Justice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2017

Kate Brown
Kate Brown*
Affiliation:
Department of Social Policy and Social Work, University of York E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

At the same time as failures to adequately protect ‘the most vulnerable’ seem to have become a pervasive feature of the political landscape, policies which seek to address vulnerability have proliferated. Government actors, public officers, researchers, media commentators, charities and members of the public alike use vulnerability to articulate an array of personal and political troubles, yet alongside this seemingly shared narrative a multitude of ideologically inclined assumptions and agendas operate by stealth. How vulnerability is drawn upon to frame social issues reworks and reconfigures long-running contestations related to moral dimensions of the welfare subject, understandings of the ‘self’ and wider beliefs about human behaviour. At a time when the pressures of contemporary life increasingly find release through aggression against the socially marginalised (see Wacquant, 2009; Harrison and Sanders, 2014; Atkinson, 2015), vulnerability has become a key concept for social policy research. As I have argued elsewhere, the concept of vulnerability appears to be something of a zeitgeist or ‘spirit of the time’ (Brown, 2014a, 2014b,2015), extending into and shaping responses to a vast array of policy matters.

Type
Themed Section on Vulnerability and Social Justice
Information
Social Policy and Society , Volume 16 , Issue 3 , July 2017 , pp. 423 - 427
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aassve, A., Cottini, E. and Vitali, A. (2013) ‘Youth vulnerability in Europe during the great recession’, Dondena Working Paper No. 57, Dondena Centre for Research on Social Dynamics, Milan. Italy.Google Scholar
Adger, N. (2006) ‘Vulnerability’, Global Environmental Change, 16, 3, 268–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atkinson, R. (2015) ‘Urban policy, city control and social catharsis: the attack on social frailty as therapy’, British Journal of Criminology, 55, 5, 866–82.Google Scholar
Beck, U. (2009) World at Risk, Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Brown, B. (2012) Daring Greatly: How the Courage to Be Vulnerable Transforms the Way We Live, Love, Parent and Lead, London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Brown, K. (2011) ‘“Vulnerability”: handle with care’, Journal of Ethics and Social Welfare, 5, 3, 313–21.Google Scholar
Brown, K. (2014a) ‘Beyond protection: “the vulnerable” in the age of austerity’, in Harrison, M. and Sanders, T. (eds.), Social Policies and Social Control: New Perspectives on the Not-so-Big Society, Bristol: Policy Press, 39–52.Google Scholar
Brown, K. (2014b) ‘Questioning the vulnerability zeitgeist: care and control practices with “vulnerable” young people’, Social Policy and Society, 34, 3, 371–87.Google Scholar
Brown, K. (2015) Vulnerability and Young People: Care and Social Control in Policy and Practice, Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar
Brown, K. (forthcoming) ‘The Governance of vulnerability: regulation, support and social divisions in action’, International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy.Google Scholar
Butler, J. (2004) Precarious Life: The Powers of Mourning and Violence, London: Verso.Google Scholar
Carr, H. and Hunter, C. (2008) ‘Managing vulnerability: homelessness law and the interplay of the social, the political and the technical’ Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law, 30, 4, 293–307.Google Scholar
Chambers, R. (1989) ‘Vulnerability, coping and policy’, Institute of Development Studies (IDS) Bulletin, 37, 4, 33–40.Google Scholar
Dunn, M., Clare, I. and Holland, A. (2008) ‘To empower or protect? Constructing the “vulnerable adult” in English law and public policy’, Legal Studies, 28, 2, 234–53.Google Scholar
Ecclestone, K. (2016) ‘Behaviour change policy agendas for “vulnerable” subjectivities: the dangers of therapeutic governance and its new entrepreneurs’, Journal of Education Policy, http://tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/02680939.2016.1219768.Google Scholar
Emmel, N. and Hughes, K. (2014) ‘Vulnerability, inter-generational exchange, and the conscience of generations’, in Holland, J. and Edwards, R. (eds.), Understanding Families over Time: Research and Policy, Basingstoke: Palgrave, 161–75.Google Scholar
Fineman, M. (2008) ‘The vulnerable subject: anchoring equality in the human condition’, Yale Journal of Law and Feminism, 20, 1, 1–23.Google Scholar
Fineman, M. (2014) ‘Vulnerability, resilience, and LGBT youth’, Temple Political and Civil Rights Law Review, 23, 2, 307–29.Google Scholar
Fletcher, D. R., Flint, J., Batty, E. and McNeil, J. (2016) ‘Gamers or victims of the system? Welfare and the cynical manipulation of vulnerability’, Journal of Poverty and Social Justice, 24, 2, 171–85.Google Scholar
Furedi, F. (2008) ‘Fear and security: a vulnerability-led policy response’, Social Policy and Administration, 42, 6, 645–61.Google Scholar
Goodin, R. (1985) Protecting the Vulnerable: A Re-analysis of Our Social Responsibilities, London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Harrison, M. and Sanders, T. (2006) ‘Vulnerable people and the development of “regulatory therapy”’, in Dearling, A., Newburn, T. and Somerville, P. (eds.), Supporting Safer Communities: Housing, Crime and Neighborhoods, Coventry: Chartered Institute of Housing, 155–68.Google Scholar
Harrison, M. and Sanders, T. (2014) Social Policies and Social Control: New Perspectives on the Not-so-Big Society, Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar
Hollomotz, A. (2009) ‘Beyond “vulnerability”: an ecological model approach to conceptualizing risk of sexual violence against people with learning difficulties’, British Journal of Social Work, 39, 99–112.Google Scholar
Mackenzie, C., Rogers, W. and, Dodds, S. (2014) Vulnerability: New Essays in Ethics and Feminist Philosophy, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
McLaughlin, K. (2012) Surviving Identity: Vulnerability and the Psychology of Recognition, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
McLeod, J. (2012) ‘Vulnerability and the neoliberal youth citizen: a view from Australia’, Comparative Education, 48, 1, 11–26.Google Scholar
Peroni, L. and Timmer, A. (2013) ‘Vulnerable groups: the promise of an emergent concept in European Human Rights Convention Law’, International Journal of Constitutional Law, 11, 4, 1056–85.Google Scholar
Rose, N. (1996) ‘Governing “advanced” liberal democracies’, in Barry, A., Osbourne, T. and Rose, N. (eds.), Foucault and Political Reason: Liberalism, Neo-Liberalism and Rationalities of Government, London: UCL Press.Google Scholar
United National Development Programme (UNDP) (2014) Human Development Report 2014: Sustaining Human Progress: Reducing Vulnerabilities and Building Resilience, New York: UNDP.Google Scholar
United Nations (2015) Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, http://www.un.org/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A/RES/70/1&Lang=E.Google Scholar
Wacquant, L. (2009) Punishing the Poor: The Neoliberal Government of Social Insecurity, London: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Walkgate, S. (2011) ‘Reframing criminal victimization: finding a place for vulnerability and resilience’, Theoretical Criminology, 15, 2, 179–94.Google Scholar
Wisener, B. and Adams, J. (2002) Environmental Health in Emergencies and Disasters, Geneva: World Health Organisation.Google Scholar
World Bank (2005) World Development Report 2000–2001, Attacking Poverty: Opportunity, Empowerment and Security, Washington DC: The World Bank.Google Scholar
Wright Mills, C. (1959) The Sociological Imagination, London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar