Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T03:45:51.270Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Employability Pathways and Perceptions of ‘Work’ amongst Single Homeless and Vulnerably Housed People

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 August 2011

Jenny McNeill*
Affiliation:
School of Social Sciences, Nottingham Trent University E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

This article reports on a longitudinal study that explores the changing motivations to enter paid work of a sample of thirty homeless and vulnerably housed people. A pathways approach is proposed to offer insights into the complex relationships between promoting employability and the pursuit of other resettlement outcomes, such as the achievement of sustainable accommodation and recovery from long-term ill-health issues. The four pathways constructed following in-depth interviews suggest that individuals were at various stages of moving towards employment. Movement within and between pathways was affected by personal and structural issues, including access to resources, housing situations and support needs.

Type
Themed Section on Exploring Multiple Exclusion Homelessness
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BAOH (2009), ‘Making Work, work’, www.bitc.org.uk [accessed 01.04.2010].Google Scholar
Bowpitt, G. and Harding, R. (2009), ‘Not going it alone: social integration and tenancy sustainability for formerly homeless substance users’, Social Policy and Society, 8, 1, 111.Google Scholar
Cebulla, A., Heaver, C., Smith, N. and Sutton, L. (2004), Drug and Alcohol Use as Barriers to Employment: Final Report, Loughborough: Loughborough University.Google Scholar
CESI (Centre for Economic and Social Inclusion) (2005), Access to Mainstream Public Services for Homeless People: A Literature Review, London: Crisis.Google Scholar
Clapham, D. (2005), The Meaning of Housing: A Pathways Approach, Bristol: The Policy Press.Google Scholar
Cloke, P., May, J. and Johnsen, S. (2008), ‘Performativity and affect in the homeless city’, Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 26, 2, 241–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crane, M. and Warnes, A. M. (2007), ‘The outcomes of rehousing older homeless people: a longitudinal study’, Ageing and Society, 27, 6, 891918.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Department for Communities and Local Government (DCLG) (2008), No One Left Out – Communities Ending Rough Sleeping, London: DCLG.Google Scholar
Downey, D. (2008), Perspectives on Irish Homelessness: Past, Present and Future, Homeless Agency, http://www.drugsandalcohol.ie/11723/1/homeless_agency_Perspectives.pdf#page=79 [accessed 01.05.2010].Google Scholar
Dwyer, P. (2000), Welfare Rights and Responsibilities: Contesting Social Citizenship, Bristol: The Policy Press.Google Scholar
Fitzpatrick, S., Kemp, P. and Klinker, S. (2000), Single Homelessness: An Overview of Research in Britain, Bristol: The Policy Press.Google Scholar
Fletcher, D. R., Gore, T., Reeve, K. and Robinson, D. (2008), Social Housing and Worklessness: Key Policy Messages, London: DWP, http://campaigns.dwp.gov.uk/asd/asd5/rports2007-2008/rrep482.pdf [accessed 02.01.2011].Google Scholar
Harding, J. and Willett, A. (2008), ‘Barriers and contradictions in the resettlement of single homeless people’, Social Policy and Society, 7, 4, 433–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hennessy, C., Grant, D., Cook, I. and Meadows, M. (2005), ‘Young and homeless: an evaluation of a resettlement service on Merseyside’, International Journal of Consumer Studies, 29, 2, 137–47.Google Scholar
Homeless Link (2009), Meaningful Occupation and Activities, http://homeless.org.uk/meaningful-occupation [accessed 01.01.2010].Google Scholar
Jones, A. and Higate, P. (2000), Breaking Down Barriers: Meeting Housing and Support Needs in Swansea, Neath Port-Talbot, Bridgend and Carmarthenshire, York: Centre for Housing Policy, University of York.Google Scholar
Jones, A. and Pleace, N. (2010), A Review of Single Homelessness in the UK 2000–2010, York: University of York.Google Scholar
Jones, A. and Pleace, N. (2005), Daytime Homelessness, London: Crisis.Google Scholar
Luby, J. and Welch, J. (2006), Missed Opportunities: The Case for Investment in Learning and Skills for Homeless People, London: Crisis.Google Scholar
McNaughton, C. (2008), Transitions through Homelessness: Lives on the Edge. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Pleace, N. (1998), ‘Single homelessness as social exclusion: the unique and the extreme’, Social Policy and Administration, 32, 1, 4659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quilgars, D., Johnsen, S. and Pleace, N. (2008), Youth Homelessness in the UK: A Decade of Progress? York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.Google Scholar
Ravenhill, M. (2008), The Culture of Homelessness, Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
SEU (2004), Mental Health and Social Exclusion, London: ODPM.Google Scholar
SEU (2002), Reducing Re-offending by Ex-prisoners, London: ODPM.Google Scholar
Singh, P. (2005), No Home, No Job: Moving on from Transitional Spaces, London: Off the Streets and into Work.Google Scholar
Thames Reach (2008), Helping Homeless People Back into Work, http://www.thamesreach.org.uk/news-and-views/helping-homeless-people-back-into-work/ [accessed 27.03.2008].Google Scholar
Tischler, V. (2008), ‘Resettlement and reintegration: single mothers’ reflections after homelessness’, Community, Work and Family, 11, 3, 243–52.Google Scholar