Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T05:24:03.619Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Domestic-Sector Work in the UK: Locating Men in the Configuration of Gendered Care and Migration Regimes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2010

Majella Kilkey
Majella Kilkey*
Affiliation:
Department of Social Sciences, University of Hull, UK E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Research on the processes underpinning the contemporary growth in the commoditisation of domestic labour focuses on feminised areas of work, such as cleaning and care. Yet research examining trends in domestic outsourcing highlights how men's, as well as women's, household work is subject to increased commoditisation. Through a qualitative enquiry of households which outsource stereotypically male domestic chores – essentially, household and garden repair and maintenance – and men who do such work for pay, we seek to understand the processes underpinning its outsourcing. In doing so, we adopt a framework which treats the paid domestic-work sector as a critical nexus at which gendered care and migration regimes intersect. The focus on male domestic chores, however, requires that we broaden that framework in ways which can more fully illuminate men's positions within it.

Type
Themed Section on Domestic and Care Work at the Intersection of Welfare, Gender and Migration Regimes
Information
Social Policy and Society , Volume 9 , Issue 3 , July 2010 , pp. 443 - 454
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aliaga, C. (2006), ‘How is the time of women and men distributed in Europe?’, Statistics in Focus, Population and Social Conditions, 4/2006, Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.Google Scholar
Anderson, B. (2000), Doing the Dirty Work? The Global Politics of Domestic Labour, London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
Anderson, B. (2007), ‘A very private business: exploring the demand for migrant domestic workers’, European Journal of Women's Studies, 14, 3, 247–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, A. and Bryson, C. (2005), ‘Work–life balance – still a “women's issue”?’, in Park, A., Curtice, J., Thomson, K., Bromley, C., Phillips, M. and Johnson, M. (eds.), British Social Attitudes, 22nd Report, London: Sage.Google Scholar
Bittman, M., Matheson, G. and Meagher, G. (1999), ‘The changing boundary between home and market: Australian trends in outsourcing domestic labour’, Work, Employment and Society, 13, 2, 249–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, D. (2008), More Destitution in Leeds, York: JRF Charitable Trust.Google Scholar
Cancedda, L. (2001), Employment in Household Services, Dublin: European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions.Google Scholar
Cox, R. (2006), The Servant Problem: Domestic Employment in a Global Economy, London: I B Tauris.Google Scholar
Cox, R. (2008), ‘Hired hubbies and mobile mums: discourses of skill and the gendering of paid work in the home’, Paper presented at the ‘Domestic Work and the Making of the Modern World Conference’, Warwick University, May 2008.Google Scholar
Crompton, R. and Lyonette, C. (2008), ‘Mothers’ employment, work–life conflict, careers and class’, in Scott, J., Dex, S. and Joshi, H. (eds.), Women and Employment. Changing Lives and New Challenges’, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Dermott, E. (2008), Intimate Fatherhood, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
De Ruijter, E. and van der Lippe, T. (2009), ‘Getting outside help: how trust problems explain household differences in domestic outsourcing in the Netherlands’, Journal of Family Issues, 30, 1, 13–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
EHRC (2009), ‘Working better: fathers, family and work – contemporary perspectives’, Research Summary 43, Equalities and Human Rights Commission, London.Google Scholar
European Commission (EC) (2009a), ‘Indicators for monitoring the Employment Guidelines including indicators for additional employment analysis 2009 compendium’, Version of: 22/04/2009.Google Scholar
European Commission (EC) (2009b), ‘Five years of an enlarged EU – Economic achievements and challenges’, European Economy, No. 1/2009.Google Scholar
Eurostat (2009), ‘Compendium’, http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/portal/page/portal/Eurostat/home [03.07.2009].Google Scholar
Everingham, C. (2002), ‘Engendering time: gender equity and discourses of workplace flexibility’, Time and Society, 11, 2/3, 335–51.Google Scholar
Fagan, C., McDowell, L., Perrons, D., Ray, K. and Ward, K. (2008), ‘Class differences in mothers’ work schedules and assessments of their “work–life balance” in dual-earner couples in Britain’, in Scott, J., Dex, S. and Joshi, H. (eds.), Women and Employment: Changing Lives and New Challenges’, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Flynn, D. (2005), ‘New borders, new management: the dilemmas of modern immigration policies’, Ethnic and Racial Studies, 28, 463–90.Google Scholar
Garapich, M. (2005), ‘Soldiers and plumbers: immigration business and the impact of EU enlargement on Polish migrants’, Paper presented at the international conference ‘New Patterns of East West Migration in Europe’, 18–19 November 2005, Institute of International Economics, Hamburg.Google Scholar
Garapich, M. (2008), ‘Odyssean refugees, migrants and power: construction of the “other” within the Polish community in the United Kingdom’, in Reed-Danahay, D. and Brettell, C. (eds.), Immigrants and the Practice of Citizenship, Chapel Hill, NC: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Haylett, C. (2001), ‘Illegitimate subjects? Abject whites, neoliberal modernisation and middle-class multiculturalism’, Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 19, 351–79.Google Scholar
Hondagneu-Sotelo, P. (2001), Doméstica: Immigrant Workers Cleaning and Caring in the Shadows of Affluence, Berkley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Kilkey, M. and Perrons, D. (2010), ‘Gendered divisions in domestic-work time: the rise of the (migrant) handyman phenomenon’, forthcoming Time & Society.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, J. (2009), Work–Family Balance, Gender and Policy, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lister, R. (2006), ‘Children (but not women) first: New Labour, child welfare and gender’, Critical Social Policy, 26, 2, 315–35.Google Scholar
Lister, R., Williams, F., Anttonen, A., Bussemaker, J., Gerhard, U., Heinen, J., Johansson, S., Leira, A., Siim, B., Tobio, C. and Gavanas, A. (2007), Gendering Citizenship in Western Europe, Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar
Lutz, H. (ed.) (2008) Migration and Domestic Work: A European Perspective on a Global Theme, Avebury: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Lutz, H. (2008a), ‘Introduction: Migrant Domestic Workers in Europe’, in Lutz, H. (ed.), Migration and Domestic Work: A European Perspective on a Global Theme, Avebury: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Lutz, H. (2008b), ‘When home becomes a workplace: domestic work as an ordinary job in Germany?’, in Lutz, H. (ed.), Migration and Domestic Work: A European Perspective on a Global Theme, Avebury: Ashgate.Google Scholar
McDowell, L. (2008), ‘On the significance of being white: European migrant workers in the British Economy in the 1940s and 2000s’, in Dwyer, C. and Bressey, C. (eds.), New Geographies of Race and Racism, Avebury: Ashgate.Google Scholar
McDowell, L., Batnitzky, A. and Dyer, S. (2007), ‘Division, segmentation, and interpellation: the embodied labors of migrant workers in a Greater London Hotel’, Economic Geography, 83, 1, 1–25.Google Scholar
O'Brien, M. (2005), ‘Shared caring: bringing fathers into the frame’, London, Equal Opportunities Commission Working Paper No. 18.Google Scholar
Pahl, R. E. (1984), Divisions of Labour, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Parreñas, R. (2001), Servants of Globalisation: Women, Migration and Domestic Work, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Perrons, D., Plomien, A. and Kilkey, M. (2010), ‘Migration and social divisions within an enlarged European Union’, European Urban and Regional Studies (forthcoming).Google Scholar
Ramirez, H. and Hondagneu-Sotelo, P. (2009), ‘Mexican immigrant gardeners: entrepreneurs or exploited workers?’, Social Problems, 56, 70–88.Google Scholar
Sarti, R. (2006), ‘Domestic service: past and present in southern and northern Europe’, Gender and History, 18, 2, 222–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seidler, V. (1997), Man Enough: Embodying Masculinities, London: Sage.Google Scholar
UK Border Agency (2009), Acession Monitoring Report May 2004–March 2009, Accession 8, http://www.ukba.homeoffice.gov.uk/sitecontent/documents/aboutus/reports/accession_monitoring_report/ (1 June 2009).Google Scholar
Wajcman, J. (2008), ‘Life in the fast lane? Towards a sociology of technology and time’, The British Journal of Sociology, 50, 1, 59–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waldinger, R. and Lichter, M. I. (2003), How the Other Half Works, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Williams, F. and Gavanas, A. (2008), ‘The intersection of child care regimes and migration regimes: a three-country study’, in Lutz, H. (ed.), Migration and Domestic Work: A European Perspective on a Global Theme, Avebury: Ashgate.Google Scholar