Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T05:43:46.922Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Defamilisation of Twenty-Two Countries: Its Implications for the Study of East Asian Welfare Regime

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 November 2012

Ruby C. M. Chau  and
Sam W. K. Yu
Sam W. K. Yu
Affiliation:
Department of Social Work, Hong Kong Baptist University Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Two analytical tasks have been conducted in this article. The first is to construct a defamilisation typology that covers eighteen OECD members and four tiger economies (namely Hong Kong, Taiwan, South Korea and Singapore). The second is to demonstrate this typology's contribution to the debate on the existence of two essential preconditions for the development of an all-encompassing East Asian welfare regime: (1) the existence of significant differences in the welfare systems between the East Asian countries and the non-East Asian OECD countries; and (2) the existence of significant similarities in the welfare systems of the East Asian countries.

Type
Articles
Information
Social Policy and Society , Volume 12 , Issue 3 , July 2013 , pp. 355 - 367
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abrahamson, P., Boje, T. and Greve, B. (2005) Welfare and Families in Europe, Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Aspalter, C. (2007) ‘The Asian cure for health care’, Far Eastern Economic Review, 170, 9, 56–9.Google Scholar
Bambra, C. (2004) ‘Weathering the storm: convergence, divergence and the robustness of the Worlds of Welfare’, The Social Policy Journal, 3, 3, 3–23.Google Scholar
Bambra, C. (2007) ‘Defamilisation and welfare state regimes: a cluster analysis’, International Journal of Social Welfare, 16, 4, 326–38.Google Scholar
Chau, C. M. and Yu, W. K. (1997) ‘The sexual division of care in mainland China and Hong Kong’, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 21, 4, 607–19.Google Scholar
Chau, C. M. and Yu, W. K. (2005) ‘Is welfare unAsian?’, in Walker, A. and Wong, C. K. (eds.), East Asian Welfare Regimes in Transition: From Confucianism to Globalization, Bristol: The Policy Press, pp. 21–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chiu, W. K. and Wong, K. C. (2009) A Literature Review of Family Policy in Four East Asian Societies, Hong Kong: The Chinese University of Hong Kong.Google Scholar
Chiu, W. K., Wong, K. C. and Yi, T. S. (2008) A Cross-National Comparison of Family Policy, commissioned by and submitted to Central Policy Unit Hong Kong SAR Government, Hong Kong: Public Policy Research Centre, Hong Kong Institute of Asia-Pacific Studies, The Chinese University of Hong Kong.Google Scholar
Council of Labour Affairs Executive Yuan R.O.C. Taiwan (2010) Labour Standards Act, Chapter 50, http://laws.cla.gov.tw [accessed 30.10.2010].Google Scholar
Croissant, A. (2004) ‘Changing welfare regimes in East and Southeast Asia: crisis, change and challenge’, Social Policy and Administration, 38, 5, 504–24.Google Scholar
Daly, M. (1994) ‘Comparing welfare states: towards a gender friendly approach’, in Sainsbury, D. (ed.), Gendering Welfare States, London: Sage, pp. 101–17.Google Scholar
Esping-Andersen, G. (1990) The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism, London: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Esping-Andersen, G. (1997) ‘Hybrid or unique? The Japanese welfare state between Europe and America’, Journal of European Social Policy, 7, 3, 179–89.Google Scholar
Gauthier, A. H. (1996) The State and the Family: A Comparative Analysis of Family Policies in Industralised Countries, Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holliday, I. (2000) ‘Productivist welfare capitalism: social policy in East Asia’, Political Studies, 48, 3, 706–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holliday, I. and Wilding, P. (2003) Welfare Capitalism in East Asia: Social Policy in the Tiger Economies, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Jones, C. (ed.) (1993) New Perspectives in the Welfare State in Europe, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Karim, S. A., Eikemo, T. A. and Bambra, C. (2010) ‘Welfare state regimes and population health: integrating the East Asian welfare states’, Health Policy, 94, 1, 45–53.Google Scholar
Korpi, W. (2000) ‘Faces of inequality: gender, class and patterns of inequalities in different types of welfare state’, Social Politics, 7, 2, 127–91.Google Scholar
Ku, Y. W. and Jones Finer, C. (2007) ‘Developments in East Asian welfare studies’, Social Policy and Administration, 41, 2, 115–31.Google Scholar
Lee, J.-K. (2005) ‘Neo-familism and women: the modern transformation of the Korean family’, in Chang, P., and Kim, E. S. (eds.), Women's Experiences and Feminist Practices in South Korea, Seoul: Ewha Women's University Press, pp. 155–76.Google Scholar
Lee, Y.-J. and Ku, Y.-W. (2007) ‘East Asian welfare regimes: testing the hypothesis of the developmental welfare state’, Social Policy and Administration, 41, 2, 197–212.Google Scholar
Lin, J. P., Chang, T. F. and Huang, C. H. (2011) ‘Intergenerational relations and life satisfaction among older women in Taiwan’, International Journal of Social Welfare, 20, s1, S47–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lister, R. (1997) Citizenship: Feminist Perspectives, London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
National Statistics, R.O.C. Taiwan (Directorate General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics, Executive Yuan) (2009), Employment Statistics, http://www.stat.gov.tw [accessed 30.10.2010].Google Scholar
National Statistics, R.O.C. Taiwan (Directorate General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics, Executive Yuan) (2010) Employment Statistics, http://www.stat.gov.tw [accessed 19.11.2011].Google Scholar
Peng, I. (2011) ‘The good, the bad and the confusing: the political economy of social care expansion in South Korea’, Development and Change, 42, 4, 905–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Powell, M. and Barrientos, A. (2004) ‘Welfare regimes and the welfare mix’, European Journal of Political Research, 43, 1, 83–105.Google Scholar
Powell, M. and Barrientos, A. (2011) ‘An audit of the welfare modelling business’, Social Policy and Administration, 45, 1, 69–84.Google Scholar
Ramesh, M. (2004) Social Policy in East and Southeast Asia, London: Routledge Curzon.Google Scholar
Rozman, G. (1991) The East Asian Region: Confucian Heritage and Its Modern Adaptation (ed.), Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Sainsbury, D. (1999) ‘Gender, policy regimes and politics’, in Sainsbury, D. (ed.), Gender and Welfare State Regimes, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 245–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shin, C. S. and Shaw, I. (2003) ‘Social policy in South Korea: cultural and structural factors in the emergence of welfare’, Social Policy and Administration, 37, 4, 328–41.Google Scholar
Sung, S. (2003) ‘Women reconciling paid and unpaid work in a Confucian welfare state: the case of South Korea’, Social Policy and Administration, 27, 4, 342–60.Google Scholar
Taiwan Labour Law (2010) Equal Work Ordinance, http://taiwanlabourlaw.com [accessed 11.09.2010].Google Scholar
Taylor-Gooby, P. (1996) ‘The response of government: fragile convergence’, in George, V. and Taylor-Gooby, P. (eds.), European Welfare Policy: Squaring the Welfare Circle, London: Macmillan, pp. 199–219.Google Scholar
Teo, P. and Yeoh, B. (1999) ‘Interweaving the public and the private: women's responses to population policy shifts in Singapore’, International Journal of Population Geography, 5, 2, 79–96.Google Scholar
United Nations (2005) The World's Women 2005: Progress in Statistics, New York: United Nations.Google Scholar
United Nations (2010) The World's Women 2010: Trends and Statistics, New York: United Nations.Google Scholar
United Nations Development Programme (2010) Human Development Report 2010, http://hdr.undp.org/en/ [accessed 01.11.2010].Google Scholar
Walker, A. and Wong, C. K. (2004) ‘The ethnocentric construction of the welfare state’, in Kennett, P (ed.), A Handbook of Comparative Social Policy, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 116–50.Google Scholar
Walker, A. and Wong, C. K. (2005) ‘Introduction: East Asian welfare regimes’, in Walker, A. and Wong, C. K. (eds.), East Asian Welfare Regimes in Transition, Hong Kong: The Policy Press, pp. 3–20.Google Scholar
Wendt, C. (2009) ‘Mapping European healthcare systems: a comparative analysis of financing, service provision and access to healthcare’, Journal of European Social Policy, 19, 5, 432–45.Google Scholar
Won, S. Y. and Pascall, G. (2004) ‘A Confucian war over childcare? Practice and policy in childcare and their implications for understanding the Korea gender regime’, Social Policy and Administration, 38, 3, 270–89.Google Scholar
Wong, T. and Yeoh, B. (2003) Fertility and the Family: An Overview of Pro-natalist Population Policies in Singapore, Asia MetaCentre Research Paper No. 12, Singapore: National University of Singapore.Google Scholar
Wong, C. K., Tang, K. L. and Ye, S. Q. (2011) ‘The perceived importance of family-friendly policies to childbirth decision making among Hong Kong’, International Journal of Social Welfare, 20, 4, 381–92.Google Scholar
World Bank (1993) The East Asian Miracle: Economic Growth and Public Policy, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wu, S-y. J. (2007), ‘Motherhood: negotiating paid work and care – a comparative study between two different generations in Taiwan’, Ph.D. thesis, University of Bath, Bath.Google Scholar
Yu, W. K. (2008) ‘The normative ideas underpinning the welfare to work measures for young people in Hong Kong and the UK’, International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 28, 9/10, 380–93.Google Scholar