Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T11:20:08.608Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Creating Community Cohesion: The Power of Using Innovative Methods to Facilitate Engagement and Genuine Partnership

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2011

Carolyn Kagan  and
Karen Duggan
Carolyn Kagan
Affiliation:
Research Institute for Health and Social Change, Manchester Metropolitan University E-mail: [email protected]
Karen Duggan
Affiliation:
Research Institute for Health and Social Change, Manchester Metropolitan University E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

National policies implemented at local level require marginalised community groups to work with public sector agencies and professionals. It can be a significant challenge to work across these boundaries. This article explores how creative and visual methods can be used to support people from so-called ‘hard-to-reach’ groups to articulate complex thoughts and ideas, and communicate their experience of living in their communities. Examples are drawn from the authors’ recent work in the north of England on regeneration and social cohesion, in which university staff collaborated on separate projects in partnership with – and driven by – community groups.

Type
Themed Section on Remixing the Economy of Welfare? Changing Roles and Relationships between the State and the Voluntary and Community Sector
Information
Social Policy and Society , Volume 10 , Issue 3 , July 2011 , pp. 393 - 404
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ahmed, A. J. (1996), Daybreak Is Near: Literature, Clans, and the Nation-State in Somalia, Trenton: The Red Sea Press.Google Scholar
Arnstein, S. (1969), ‘A ladder of citizen participation’, Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35, 4, 216–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Audit Commission (1998), A Fruitful Partnership, London: Audit Commission, http://www.audit-commission.gov.uk/ [accessed 07.03.2008].Google Scholar
Banks, M. (2001), Visual Methods in Social Research, London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barker, J. and Weller, S. (2008), ‘Is it fun? Developing child centred research methods’, International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 23, 1/2, 33–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brodie, E., Cowling, E. and Nussen, N. (2009), Understanding Participation: A Literature Review, London: CNCVO, Pathways to Participation.Google Scholar
Chin, K. and Rudelius-Palmer, K. (2010), ‘Storytelling as a relational and instrumental tool for addressing social justice’, Race/Ethnicity: Multidisciplinary Global Perspectives, 3, 2, 265–81.Google Scholar
Dearling, A. (2002), ‘Games and activities’, in Dearling, A. and Skinner, A. (eds.), Making a Difference Practice and Planning in Working with Young People in Community Safety and Crime Prevention Programmes, Lyme Regis: Russell House Publishing.Google Scholar
Denborough, D. (2008), Collective Narrative Practice, Adelaide: Dulwich Centre Press.Google Scholar
Eames, M., Mortensen, J. E., Adebowale, M. and lucicissa, l. (2009), Community Engagement for Science and Sustainability: Insights form the Citizens for Science and Sustainability (SuScit) Project, Uxbridge: Brunel University.Google Scholar
Fatimilehin, I. A. and Dye, L. (2003), ‘Building bridges and community empowerment’, Clinical Psychology, 24, 51–5.Google Scholar
Friere, P. (1973), Education for Critical Consciousness, New York: Seabury Press.Google Scholar
Froggett, L., Farrier, A. and Poursanidou, D. (2008), Engaging Communities through the Arts: A Meta-Evaluation, Preston: Psychosocial Research Unit, UCLAN.Google Scholar
Hawkes, J. (2001), The Fourth Pillar of Sustainability: Culture's Essential Role in Public Planning, Melbourne: Common Ground.Google Scholar
HEFCE (2006), HEFCE Strategic Plan 2006–11, London: Higher Education Funding Council, www.hefce.ac.uk/pubs/HEFCE/2006 [accessed 03.07.2007].Google Scholar
Holding, E. (ed.) (2008), Artists and Places: Engaging Creative Minds in Regeneration, London: Commission for Architecture and the Built Environment and Arts and Business, available from Elevate www.elevate-eastlancs.co.uk [accessed 16.06.2010].Google Scholar
Hope, A. and Timmer, S. (1999), Training for Transformation: A Handbook for Community Workers, Book 1, Rugby: Practical Action.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kagan, C. (2008), Active and Positive Fatherhood: HEI-Community Engagement Project Evaluation, Manchester: RIHSC.Google Scholar
Kagan, C. and Duggan, K. (2008), ‘We Don't Believe You Want a Genuine Partnership’: University Work with Communities, Manchester: RIHSC.Google Scholar
Kagan, C. and Duggan, K. (in press), ‘Games for participation and conscientisation’, in Ornelas, J. and Ornelas, M. (eds.), Building Participative, Empowering and Diverse Communities, Lisbon: ISPA.Google Scholar
Knudsen, E. (2008), Record from the Outside 1: External Evaluation, Salford: University of Salford.Google Scholar
Langellier, K. M. (2010), ‘Performing Somali identity in the Diaspora – “Wherever I go I know who I am”’, Cultural Studies, 24, 1, 66–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
NEF (nd), ‘Democs: the game you play to have your say’, http://www.neweconomics.org/programmes/democracy-and-participation, [accessed 03.04.2010].Google Scholar
Sarkisson, W. and Wenman, C. (2010), Creative Community Planning: Transformative Engagement Methods for Working at the Edge – Tools for Community Planning, London: Earthscan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smalley, N. and Saunders, D. (eds.) (2000), The International Simulation and Gaming Research Yearbook Volume 8: Simulations and Games for Transition and Change, London: Kogan Page.Google Scholar
Stewart, A. and Kagan, C. (2008), The ‘In Bloom’ Competition: Gardening Work as a Community Involvement Strategy, Manchester: RIHSC.Google Scholar
UR-MAD (2006), Urban Regeneration: Making a Difference – Proposal to HEFCE and Delivery Plan, Newcastle: University of Northumbria, Manchester Metropolitan University, Central Lancashire University and University of Salford.Google Scholar
van Vlaenderen, H. (2004), ‘Community development research: merging communities of practice’, Community Development Journal, 39, 2, 135–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Winden, W. (2009), ‘Community participation in knowledge-based local economic development projects: the case of Newcastle's “Science Central”’, Thematic paper no. 2, REDIS Network, Newcastle, http://urbact.eu/en/projects/innovation-creativity/redis/our-outputs [accessed 03.05.2010].Google Scholar
Watson, D. (2003), ‘Universities and civic engagement: a critique and a prospectus’, keynote address for the 2nd biennial ‘Inside-out’ conference on the civic role of universities – ‘Charting Uncertainty: capital, community and citizenship’, www.brighton.ac.uk/cupps [accessed 02.04.2007].Google Scholar
Wellings, P. (2008), Intellectual Property and Research Benefits, London: Department for Business, Innovation and Skills, www.dius.gov.uk/higher_education/shape_and_structure/he_debate/intellectual_property [accessed 03.02.2010].Google Scholar
Williams, R. (1954), Culture and Society, London: Chatto & Windus.Google Scholar
Yonas, M. A., Burke, J. G., Rak, K., Bennett, A., Kelly, V. and Gielen, A. C. (2009), ‘A picture's worth a thousand words: engaging youth in CBPR using the creative arts’, Progress in Community Health Partnerships: Research, Education and Action, 3, 4, 349–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar