Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T13:18:22.890Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Comparing the Minimum Income Standard in the UK and Japan: Methodology and Outcome

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 July 2013

Abigail Davis ,
Donald Hirsch ,
Rie Iwanaga ,
Masami Iwata ,
Junko Shigekawa ,
Yuka Uzuki  and
Atsuhiro Yamada
Abigail Davis
Affiliation:
Centre for Research in Social Policy, Loughborough University E-mail: [email protected]
Donald Hirsch
Affiliation:
Centre for Research in Social Policy, Loughborough University E-mail: [email protected]
Rie Iwanaga
Affiliation:
School of Social Work, Kanagawa University of Human Services, E-mail: [email protected]
Masami Iwata
Affiliation:
Faculty of Integrated Arts and Social Sciences, Japan Women's University E-mail: [email protected]
Junko Shigekawa
Affiliation:
Faculty of Education, Saitama University E-mail: [email protected]
Yuka Uzuki
Affiliation:
Department for International Research and Co-operation, National Institute for Educational Policy Research E-mail: [email protected]
Atsuhiro Yamada
Affiliation:
Faculty of Economics, Keio University E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Minimum Income Standard (MIS) research involves an innovative methodology that combines consensual decisions made through discussion by members of the public, supported by input from experts. MIS addresses questions about income adequacy, and in particular, what is the income that people need in order to reach a minimum socially acceptable standard of living. The first MIS for Britain was published in the UK in 2008, and in 2010 researchers from Japan and the UK began to collaborate on developing a comparable Minimum Income Standard for Japan. This article discusses the differences and similarities between the UK and Japanese MIS. It looks at the challenges of applying the methodology in a very different setting and compares the results of the research in the UK and in Japan. Although there are notable differences in the lists of goods and services that comprise the budgets, there are also some striking similarities. This research suggests that the MIS methodology offers an approach that can be used in different countries to inform discussions on contemporary living standards and societal norms, and to enable international comparisons to be drawn.

Keywords

Minimum income standardsbudget standardsJapanUK
Type
Themed Section on Comparative Perspectives on Poverty and Inequality: Japan and the United Kingdom
Information
Social Policy and Society , Volume 13 , Issue 1 , January 2014 , pp. 89 - 101
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bradshaw, J., Middleton, S., Davis, A., Oldfield, N., Smith, N., Cusworth, L. and Williams, J. (2008) A Minimum Income Standard for Britain: What People Think, York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.Google Scholar
Clery, E. (2012) ‘Are tough times affecting attitudes to welfare?’, in Park, A., Clery, E., Curtice, J., Phillips, M. and Utting, D. (eds.), British Social Attitudes: The 29th Report, London: NatCen Social Research, www.bsa-29.natcen.ac.uk.Google Scholar
Davis, A., Hirsch, D. and Smith, N. (2010) A Minimum Income Standard for the UK in 2010, York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.Google Scholar
Davis, A., Hirsch, D., Smith, N., Beckhelling, J. and Padley, M. (2012) A Minimum Income Standard for the UK in 2012: Keeping up in hard times, York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.Google Scholar
Eurostat (2005) Comparable Time Use Statistics – National Tables from 10 European Countries – February 2005, Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/cache/ITY_OFFPUB/KS-CC-05–001/EN/KS-CC-05–001-EN.PDF.Google Scholar
Giles, H., Noels, K. A., Williams, A., Ota, H., Lim, T.-S., Sik, H. N., Ryan, E. B. and Somera, L. (2003) ‘Intergenerational communication across cultures: young people's perceptions of conversations with family elders, non-family elders and same-age peers’, Journal of Cross-Cultural Gerontology, 18, 1, 1–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hills, J. (2001) ‘Poverty and social security: what rights? Whose responsibilities?’, in Park, A., Curtice, J., Thomson, K., Jarvis, L. and Bromley, C. (eds.), British Social Attitudes: The 18th Report – Public Policy, Social Ties, London: Sage.Google Scholar
Hirsch, D. (1993) City Strategies for Lifelong Learning, Paris: OECD/Centre for Educational Research and Innovation.Google Scholar
Hirsch, D. (2011) A Minimum Income Standard for the UK in 2011, York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.Google Scholar
Hirsch, D., Davis, A. and Smith, N. (2009) A Minimum Income Standard for Britain in 2009, York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.Google Scholar
Iwanaga, R. (2011) How the Japanese Public Assistance System Formulated the Concept of Minimum Living Standards: Historical Analysis of the Standards and Implementation Guidelines, Kyoto: Minerva Shobo (in Japanese).Google Scholar
Iwanaga, R. and Iwata, M. (2012) ‘Introduction to the special issue of a minimum income standard research in Japan’, Social Policy and Labor Studies, 4, 1, 58–60 (in Japanese).Google Scholar
Lee, O. and Jose, T. (2013) ‘How might recent UK education policy changes affect the supply of skills to the labour market? Are these changes desirable?’, Norwich Economic Papers, 8 (May), www.oecd.org/employment/employmentpoliciesanddata/onlineoecdemploymentdatabase.htm.Google Scholar
Middleton, S. (1997) Household Budgetary Requirements in Jersey, CRSP296, Loughborough: Centre for Research in Social Policy.Google Scholar
Middleton, S. (2000) ‘Agreeing poverty lines: the development of consensual budget standards methodology’, in Bradshaw, J. and Sainsbury, R. (eds.), Researching Poverty, Aldershot: Ashgate, pp. 59–76.Google Scholar
Middleton, S., Ashworth, K. and Walker, R. (1994) Family Fortunes: Pressures on Parents and Children in the 1990s, London: CPAG Ltd.Google Scholar
Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications (2012) Labour Force Survey, www.stat.go.jp/data/nenkan/pdf/yhyou16.pdf (accessed 6 December 2012).Google Scholar
Nibud (2010) The Minimum Agreed Upon – Consensual Budget Standards for the Netherlands, The Hague: Nibud.Google Scholar
Ogawa, A. (2009) ‘Japan's new lifelong learning policy: exploring lessons from the European knowledge economy’, International Journal of Lifelong Education, 28, 5, 601–14, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02601370903190011 (accessed 25 October 2012).Google Scholar
Parker, H. (ed.) (1995) Modest but Adequate: Summary Budgets for Sixteen Households, October 1994 Prices, London: FBU, NCC Publications.Google Scholar
Parker, H. (ed.) (1998) Low Cost but Acceptable: A Minimum Income Standard for the UK – Families with Young Children, Bristol: The Policy Press.Google Scholar
Shigekawa, J. and Yamada, A. (2012) ‘Measuring minimum income standards in Japan: applying the new British method’, Social Policy and Labor Studies, 4, 1, 71–84 (in Japanese).Google Scholar
Smith, N., Phung, V., Davis, A. and Hirsch, D. (2009) A Minimum Income Standard for Northern Ireland, York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.Google Scholar
Smith, N., Davis, A. and Hirsch, D. (2010) A Minimum Income Standard for Rural Households, York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation and Commission for Rural Communities.Google Scholar
Smith, N., Davis, A. and Hirsch, D. (2011) A Minimum Income Standard for Guernsey, CRSP 618, Loughborough: Centre for Research in Social Policy.Google Scholar
Uzuki, Y. (2012) ‘Comparing minimum income standards between Japan and the UK: MIS budgets and their implications’, Social Policy and Labor Studies, 4, 1, 85–96 (in Japanese).Google Scholar
Walker, R. (1987) ‘Consensual approaches to the definition of poverty: towards an alternative methodology’, Journal of Social Policy, 16, 2, 213–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yamada, A. (2010) ‘Targeting the relative benefit levels of social assistance to minimum wages in an international perspective’, Social Policy and Labor Studies, 2, 2, 33–47 (in Japanese).Google Scholar