No CrossRef data available.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 15 June 2022
The United States juvenile justice system has primary oversight of youth who come into contact with legal authorities. This system is purposefully distinct from the adult system given the presumption of youths’ reduced culpability for delinquent behavior and increased potential for rehabilitation. Some juvenile court policies and practices are supportive of youth while others may drive youth further into the juvenile justice system. Today, we are at a point in which we can—and should—use information technology to accrue data to unpack the impact of these policies and practices on and across youth. Moreover, technology-driven policies and practices such as electronic monitoring may be detrimental to the well-being of youth, whereas others such as video conferencing could be more widely used to benefit youth. While juvenile courts hold youth accountable for their behavior, courts also need to be accountable to youth by employing data-informed policies and practices that advance the health and well-being of youth.
Department of Gender and Women’s Studies, Southwest Institute for Research on Women, University of Arizona, [email protected]. Competing Interests: The author declares none.
1 U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, “Arrests of Juveniles in 2018 Reached the Lowest Level in Nearly 4 Decades,” Washington, DC (2019). https://www.ojjdp.gov/ojstatbb/snapshots/DataSnapshot_UCR2018.pdf
2 Shay Bilchik, “Juvenile Justice: A Century of Change,” 1999 National Report Series—Juvenile Justice Bulletin. U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention: Washington, DC, December 1999. https://www.ncjrs.gov/html/ojjdp/9912_2/juv1.html
3 Rebecca House, “Seen But Not Heard: Using Judicial Waiver to Save the Juvenile Justice System and Our Kids,” The University of Toledo Law Review 45, no.1 (2013): 149–79Google Scholar.
4 House, “Seen But Not Heard.
5 Coupet, Sacha M., “What To Do with the Sheep in Wolf’s Clothing: The Role of Rhetoric and Reality about Youth Offenders in the Constructive Dismantling of the Juvenile Justice System,” University of Pennsylvania Law Review 148 (2000): 1303–1346 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
6 Sally Stevens, “History of Juvenile Justice in the United States: The Need for Ongoing Research,” Drug Court Review: Findings from the National Cross-Site Evaluation of Juvenile Drug Courts and Reclaiming Futures 10, no.1 (2016): 1-5.
7 Sally Stevens and Tamara Sargus, “Well-Being of Justice-Involved Youth in Arizona.” Making Action Possible in Southern Arizona, White paper #15, Eller College of Management, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ. 2020, www.mapazdashboard.arizona.edu
8 Arnett, Chaz, “Virtual Shackles: Electronic Surveillance and the Adultification of Juvenile Courts,” Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 108, no. 3 (2018): 399–454Google Scholar.
9 Arnett, “Virtual Shackles.”
10 Barnosky, Jason, “The Violent Years: Responses to Juvenile Crime in the 1950s,” Polity 38, no. 3 (2006): 314–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar. The University of Chicago Press on behalf of the Northeastern Political Science Association, Chicago, IL, https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/3877070
11 Bilchik, “Juvenile Justice.” https://www.ncjrs.gov/html/ojjdp/9912_2/juv1.html
12 Jason Barnosky, “The Violent Years.” https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/3877070
13 Amanda J. Powell, Amy Borror, Tim Curry, Mary Ann Scali, and Hillele Simpson, “Arizona Bringing Gualt Home: An Assessment of Access to and Quality of Juvenile Defense Council,” National Juvenile Defender Center, Washington DC, 2018. https://njdc.info/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/Arizona-Assessment-NJDC.pdf
14 Congressional Research Service, “Juvenile Justice: Overview of Legislative History and Funding Trends,” Washington, DC, 2007. https://www.everycrsreport.com/reports/RS22070.html
15 Bilchik, “Juvenile Justice: A Century of Change.”
16 James Austin, Kelly Dedel Johnson, and Marie Gregoriou, “Juveniles in Adult Prisons and Jails: A National Assessment,” Institute on Crime, Justice and Correction, George Washington University and the National Council on Crime and Delinquency, Washington, DC, 2000. https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/bja/182503-1.pdf
17 Stevens, “History of Juvenile Justice in the United States.”
18 Coupet, “What To Do with the Sheep in Wolf’s Clothing.”
19 Center on Juvenile and Criminal Justice, “Juvenile Justice History,” San Francisco, CA, 2016. http://www.cjcj.org/education1/juvenile-justice-history.html
20 Thomas J. Charron, Roger Floren, Delores Heredia Ward, and Debra Whitcomb, “Measuring What Really Matters in Juvenile Justice,” American Prosecutors Research Institute, Alexandria, VA, 2006. http://ibarji.org/docs/bazemore.pdf
21 Dillard, Rebecca, Newman, Tarkington J., and Kim, Melissa, “Promoting Youth Competence through Balanced and Restorative Justice: A Community-based PYD Approach,” Journal of Youth Development 14, no. 4, (2019): 14- 35CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
22 House, “Seen But Not Heard.”
23 Soler, Mark, Shoenberg, Dana, and Schindler, Marc, “Juvenile Justice: Lessons for a New Era,” Georgetown Journal on Poverty Law and Policy XVI (2009): 483–501 Google Scholar.
24 Stevens and Sargus, “Well-Being of Justice-Involved Youth in Arizona.”
25 Sarah Hockenberry and Charles Puzzanchera, “Juvenile Court Statistics, 2018,” National Center for Juvenile Justice, Pittsburgh, PA. 2020. https://ojjdp.ojp.gov/sites/g/files/xyckuh176/files/media/document/juvenile-court-statistics-2018.pdf
26 Joseph F. Kelroy, Amy K. Stuart, Charles S. Burleson, and Angela J. Rhudy, “Arizona’s Juvenile Court Counts: Statewide Statistical Information FY 2019,” Arizona Supreme Court, Phoenix, AZ, 2020.
27 Hockenberry and Puzzanchera, “Juvenile Court Statistics, 2018.”
28 Kelroy, Stuart, Burleson, and Rhudy, “Arizona’s Juvenile Court Counts.”
29 Wendy Sawyer, “Youth Confinement: The Whole Pie 2019,” Prison Policy Institute, Los Angeles, CA, 2019. https://www.prisonpolicy.org/reports/youth2019.html
30 Kelroy, Stuart, Burleson, and Rhudy, “Arizona’s Juvenile Court Counts.”
31 Justice Policy Institute, “Sticker Shock: Calculating the Full Price Tag for Youth Incarceration,” Washington, DC, 2014. http://www.justicepolicy.org/research/8477
32 Arnett, “Virtual Shackles.”
33 Charron, Floren, Ward, and Whitcomb, “Measuring What Really Matters in Juvenile Justice.”
34 Stevens, Sally, Korchmaros, Josephine D., and Greene, Alison, “Findings from the National Cross-Site Evaluation of Juvenile Drug Courts and Reclaiming Futures,” Drug Court Review X, no. 1 (2016)Google Scholar.
35 Jessica Feierman, Naomi Goldstein, Emily Haney-Caron, and Jaymes Fairfax Columbo, “Debtors’ Prison for Kids? The High Cost of Fines and Fees in the Juvenile Justice System,” Juvenile Law Center, Philadelphia, PA, 2016. http://debtorsprison.jlc.org/documents/jlc-debtors-prison.pdf
36 Feierman, Goldstein, Haney-Caron, and Columbo, “Debtors’ Prison for Kids?”
37 Ibid.
38 Stevens and Sargus, “Well-Being of Justice-Involved Youth in Arizona.”
39 National Juvenile Defender Center, “A Right to Liberty: Reforming Juvenile Money Bail,” Washington, DC, 2019. https://njdc.info/wp-content/uploads/2019/NJDC_Right_to_Liberty.pdf
40 Feierman, Goldstein, Haney-Caron, and Columbo, “Debtors’ Prison for Kids?”
41 Stevens and Sargus, “Well-Being of Justice-Involved Youth in Arizona.”
42 Powell, Borror, Curry, Scali, and Simpson, “Arizona Bringing Gualt Home.”
43 Stevens and Sargus, “Well-Being of Justice-Involved Youth in Arizona.”
44 Ibid.
45 Ibid.
46 Developmental Services Group, Inc., “Home Confinement and Electronic Monitoring: Literature Review,” Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, Washington, DC, 2014. https://www.ojjdp.gov/mpg/litreviews/Home_Confinement_EM.pdf
47 Arnett, “Virtual Shackles.”
48 Ibid.
49 David Wilson, Charlotte Gill, Ajima Olaghere, and Dave McClure, “Juvenile Curfew Effect on Criminal Behavior and Victimization,” Campbell Collaboration, Oslo, Norway, 2016. https://campbellcollaboration.org/better-evidence/juvenile-curfew-effects-on-behaviour.html
50 Brown, Simone, Dark Matters (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2015)Google Scholar. https://www.dukeupress.edu/dark-matters
51 Stevens and Sargus, “Well-Being of Justice-Involved Youth in Arizona.”
52 Riya Saha Shah, Lauren Fine, and Jamie Gullen, “Juvenile Records: A National Review of State Laws on Confidentiality, Sealing, and Expungement,” Juvenile Law Center, Philadelphia, PA. 2014. https://jlc.org/resources/juvenile-records-national-review-state-laws-confidentiality-sealing-and-expungement
53 Riya Saha Shah and Jean Strout, “Future Interrupted: The Collateral Damage Caused by Proliferation of Juvenile Records,” Juvenile Law Center, Philadelphia, PA. 2016. https://juvenilerecords.jlc.org/juvenilerecords/documents/publications/future-interrupted.pdf
54 Ibid.
55 Stephanie Campos-Bui, Jeffrey Selbin, Hamza Jaka, Tim Kline, Ahmed Lavalais, Alynia Phillips, Abby Ridley-Kerr, “Making Families Pay: The Harmful, Unlawful, and Costly Practice of Charging Juvenile Administrative Fees in California,” University of California, Policy Advocacy Clinic, Berkeley, CA, 2017. https://www.law.berkeley.edu/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/Making-Families-Pay.pdf
56 Maureen Washburn, “SB 190 Becomes Law, Ending Harmful, Unlawful, and Costly Juvenile Justice Fees,” Center on Juvenile and Criminal Law, San Francisco, CA. 2017. http://www.cjcj.org/news/11780
57 Feierman, Goldstein, Haney-Caron, and Columbo, “Debtors’ Prison for Kids?”
58 Stevens and Sargus, “Well-Being of Justice-Involved Youth in Arizona.”
59 National Juvenile Defender Center, “A Right to Liberty.”
60 Wilson, Gill, Olaghere, and McClure, “Juvenile Curfew Effect on Criminal Behavior and Victimization.”
61 Stevens and Sargus, “Well-Being of Justice-Involved Youth in Arizona.”
62 Ryan, Joseph P., Abrams, Laura S., and Huang, Hui, “First-Time Violent Offenders: Probation, Placement, and Recidivism,” Social Work Research 38, no.1 (2014): 6–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
63 Campaign for Youth Justice, Coalition for Juvenile Justice, and the National Juvenile Justice Network, “ACT 4 Juvenile Justice: Statement Regarding Youth Justice Providers: For Use During COVID-19 Social Distancing Measures,” Washington, DC, March 2020. http://www.act4jj.org/sites/default/files/resource-files/Covid%2019%20Statment%20Updated%20April%201.pdf
64 Stevens and Sargus, “Well-Being of Justice-Involved Youth in Arizona.”
65 Leah Lessard and Hannah Schacter, “Why the Coronavirus Crisis Hits Teenagers Particularly Hard: Developmental Scientists Explain,” Education Week, 2020. https://www.edweek.org/ew/articles/2020/04/16/why-the-coronavirus-crisis-hits-teenagers-particularly.html
66 Ibid.
67 Benjamin Chambers and Annie Balck, “Because Kids Are Different: Five Opportunities for Reforming the Juvenile Justice System,” National Institute of Corrections. #029627: Washington, DC, 2014. https://nicic.gov/because-kids-are-different-five-opportunities-reforming-juvenile-justice-system
68 Zwick, Janet, Appleseth, Hannah, and Arndt, Stephen, “Stigma: How It Affects the Substance Use Disorder Patient”’ Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy 15, no. 50 (2020): 1–4CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13011-020-00288-0
69 Dillard, Rebecca, Newman, Tarkington J., and Kim, Melissa, “Promoting Youth Competence through Balanced and Restorative Justice: A Community-Based PYD Approach,” Journal of Youth Development 14, no. 4 (2019): 14- 35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
70 Stevens and Sargus, “Well-Being of Justice-Involved Youth in Arizona.”
71 Ibid.
72 Powell, Borror, Curry, Scali, and Simpson, “Arizona Bringing Gualt Home.”
73 Justice Policy Institute, “Sticker Shock: Calculating the Full Price Tag for Youth Incarceration,” Washington, DC, 2014. http://www.justicepolicy.org/research/8477
74 Chambers and Balck, “Because Kids Are Different.”