Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T09:19:24.002Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Can Democracy Promote the General Welfare?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 January 2009

James M. Buchanan
Affiliation:
Economics, Center for Study of Public Choice, George Mason University

Extract

To commence any answer to the question “Can democracy promote the general welfare?” requires attention to the meaning of “general welfare.” If this term is drained of all significance by being defined as “whatever the political decision process determines it to be,” then there is no content to the question. The meaning of the term can be restored only by classifying possible outcomes of democratic political processes into two sets – those that are general in application over all citizens and those that are discriminatory.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Social Philosophy and Policy Foundation 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 For elaboration of the analysis, see Buchanan, James M., “Foundational Concerns: A Criticism of Public Choice Theory,” in Current Issues in Public Choice, ed. Pardo, José Casas and Schneider, Friedrich (Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, 1995).Google Scholar

2 For an extended discussion of arguments made in this section, see Buchanan, James M. and Tullock, Gordon, The Calculus of Consent: Logical Foundations of Constitutional Democracy (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1962).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

3 Ibid. For the seminal analysis, see Wicksell, Knut, Finanztheoretische Untersuchungen (Jena: Fischer, 1896).Google Scholar

4 For extended discussion of the political efficiency of general taxation, see Buchanan, James M., “The Political Efficiency of General Taxation,” National Tax Journal, vol. 44, no. 4 (1994), pp. 401–10.Google Scholar

5 de Jasay, Anthony, The State (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1985).Google Scholar

6 For a formal analysis of intergenerational exchange, see Samuelson, Paul A., “An Exact Consumption-Loan Model of Interest with or without the Social Contrivance of Money,” Journal of Political Economy, vol. 66, no. 6 (12 1958), pp. 467–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar