Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T17:40:05.806Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Ecology, alterity and resistance in Sardinia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 October 2001

Tracey Heatherington
Affiliation:
School of Anthropological Studies, Queen's University Belfast, 14 University Square, Belfast BT7 1NN, Northern Ireland
Get access

Abstract

The environment has become a powerful locus for the negotiation of cultural identity in Europe. The problem of local resistance to the creation of new conservation areas compels us to question how tropes of cultural alterity shapes environmental programmes in the rural margins of the European Union. In Sardinia, the allochronism deployed in explanations of criminality has also framed discourses promoting a new Italian national park. Converging visions of social and ecological backwardness have naturalised the cultural distance between those who see the Sardinian forest as a local resource protected by indigenous traditions, and those who see it as a European or global resource endangered by local ignorance and violence. Local resistance to the park operates in a range of symbolic and material modes, opening ambiguous political spaces in which to challenge European and environmentalist constructions of history, modernity and backwardness.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 2001 European Association of Social Anthropologists

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

This paper is based on research funded by the Wenner-Gren Foundation for Anthropological Research, the Krupp Foundation (through the Minda de Gunzburg Center for European Studies at Harvard University), Fonds FCAR, and the Mellon Foundation. Segments of this paper were presented at the Canadian Anthropological Society (CASCA) Annual Meeting in Quebec City in June 1999, at the session on ‘Environmental Policy and Discourses of Otherness’, and were later developed as a chapter in my doctoral thesis (Heatherington 1999a). I gratefully acknowledge my dissertation supervisor, Michael Herzfeld, as well as Lissa Caldwell, Bernie Perley, Darren Ranco, Blair Rutherford, and Colin Scott for their helpful comments on early drafts. Sincere thanks to John Knight, Maruska Svasek, Thomas Wilson and three anonymous reviewers for critical input on later revisions.