Article contents
Teaching College Russian
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 June 2017
Extract
The Army Specialized Training Program brought to the fore numerous problems connected with Russian instruction which, on the basis of the new experience gained, may now be profitably discussed, with some thought of formulating a standard or at least generally applicable procedure. Over the last fourteen years, I have taught beginner's Russian to some twenty-five classes, ranging from the conventional three hours per week schedule to intensive courses with one, two, or three class hours daily for periods of six to twelve weeks and, finally, to the nine months’ Army program with fifteen contact-hours per week. At first glance this might seem like a respectable body of practice on which to generalize. But while the subsequent professional performances of many of our students during this period have been encouraging, I do not wish the present article to be regarded as unduly dogmatic. Looking backward, I think we should have been more ingenious in innovation, and certainly more productive of useful textbooks and other teaching aids. But here, until very recently, lack of time, money, equipment, publisher's interest, and competent assistance may serve in some sense as a valid excuse for defects in performance.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Association for Slavic, East European, and Eurasian Studies 1944
References
1 This fact alone, it seems to me, vitiates once and for all Professor R. A. Hall's recent e* parte claim (French Review, XVII, 381) that “a language is most quickly and effectively learned by speaking it first, and reading and writing it later.” If what the student wants is to learn to speak Russian, by all means let him do so, and by the speediest possible means, If, on the other hand, he prefers to learn to read first, it would be utterly ridiculous to apply lhe oral method unmodified.
- 7
- Cited by