Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T12:21:06.587Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Topography of Post-Soviet Nationalism: The Provinces—the Capital—the West

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Lyudmila Parts
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The cultural myth of the provinces provides the contemporary cultural elite with a semiotic apparatus for formulating Russia's new, postimperial identity. Today, cultural production locates true Russianness outside newly prosperous, multiethnic, and westernized Moscow. In mass culture, the traditional privileging of the center over the backward provinces gives way to the view of the provinces as a repository of national tradition and moral strength. Conversely, high literature and art-house films provide an alternative, harshly critical image of them. In both cases, a particular concept of Russianness is negotiated, one in which the provinces play a central role. Ultimately, both redirect nationalist discourse away from the deeply unsatisfying model of Russia versus the west and instead offer a hermetic national identity based on an “us versus us,” rather than “us versus them,” model.

Type
Articles
Information
Slavic Review , Volume 74 , Issue 3 , Fall 2015 , pp. 508 - 528
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Slavic, East European, and Eurasian Studies. 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

The epigraphs are from Nikolai Piksanov, Oblctstnye kul'turnyegnezda (Moscow, 1928), 58, and Liudmila Saraskina, Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn (Moscow, 2009), 823, respectively.

1. Lounsbery, Anne, “‘No, This Is Not the Provinces!’ Provincialism, Authenticity, and Russianness in Gogol's Day,” Russian Review 64, no. 2 (April 2005): 266 CrossRefGoogle Scholar. Emphasis in the original.

2. L. O. Zaionts, “Istoriia slova i poniatiia ‘provintsiia’ v russkoi kul'ture,” Russian Literature 53, nos. 2-3 (February-April 2003): 314-15. Emphases in the original.

3. Lounsbery, “‘No, This Is Not the Provinces!,’” 259-60.

4. Ibid., 268.

5. O. Bule [Boele], ‘“Polovoi vopros’ i provintsiia v publitsistike nachala XX-ogo veka,” in A. F. Belousov and T. V. Tsiv'ian, eds., Russkaia provintsiia: Mif—tekst—real'nost’ (Moscow, 2000), 75; M. V. Zagidullina, “Natsional'nyi masshtab ‘reduktsii klassiki': Provintsial'naia model’ retseptsii ‘literaturnykh vershin,'” in Belousov and Tsiv'ian, eds., Russkaia provintsiia, 102.

6. Zaionts, “Istoriia slova,” 325.

7. A. F. Belousov and T. V. Tsiv'ian, foreword to Belousov and Tsiv'ian, eds., Russkaia provintsiia, 9-11; la. E. Akhapkina, “Provintsiia, periferiia—problemy nominatsii,” in A. F. Belousov and M. V. Stroganov, eds., Provintsiia kak real'nost’ i ob”ekt osmysleniia (Tver', 2001), 6-11; Aleksei Iudin, “Kontsepty ‘provintsiia’ i ‘region’ v sovremennom russkom iazyke,” Otechestvennye zapiski 32, no. 5 (2006): 26-40; and A. Belousov, introduction to O. Iu. Oleinik, ed., Sotsiokul ‘turnye problemy istorii i sovremennogo razvitiia rossiiskoi provintsii: Mezhvuzovskii sbornik nauchnykh trudov (Ivanovo, 2002), 3.

8. Greenfeld, Liah, “The Formation of the Russian National Identity: The Role of Status Insecurity and Ressentiment ,” Comparative Studies in Society and History 32, no. 3 (July 1990): 573 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

9. Groys, Boris, “Russia and the West: The Quest for Russian National Identity,” Studies in Soviet Thought 43, no. 3 (May 1992): 185–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

10. Greenfeld cites the observations of eighteenth- and nineteenth-century Russian philosophers and writers. Greenfeld, “The Formation of the Russian National Identity.” It is worth noting that Lev Gudkov, summarizing public opinion surveys in 2003, points out that this attitude toward the west—that is, one based on ressentiment—is completely unaltered, especially regarding the United States: “If the USA is a rich society, then we're poor; if Americans are primitive, vulgar, devoid of genuine high culture, [and] materialistic, in a nutshell, a culturally undeveloped country, then we, by contrast, are vital, ‘spiritual.’ Russians have behind them ‘supreme culture,’ literature, art, music, a ‘millennial history,’ and so on.” L. Gudkov, “Otnoshenie k SShA v Rossii i problema antiamerikanizma,” Negativnaia identichnost': Stat'i 1997-2002 (Moscow, 2004), 512.

11. Lounsbery, Anne, “Dostoevsky's Geography: Centers, Peripheries, and Networks in Demons,” Slavic Review 66, no. 2 (Summer 2007): 213 Google Scholar.

12. Irina Savkina, Provintsialki russkoi literatury: Zhenskaia proza 30-40-xgodov XIX veka (Wilhelmshorst, 1998).

13. Lounsbery, “‘No, This Is Not the Provinces!,’” 268-69. Emphasis in the original.

14. See, for example, the analysis of nationalistic pathos in the final pages of Dead Souls in Mikhail Vaiskopf, Siuzhet Gogolia: Morfologiia. Ideologiia. Kontekst (Moscow, 1993), 403-31.

15. Pain, E., Mezhdu imperiei i natsiei: Modernistskii proekt i ego traditsionalistskaia al'ternativa v natsional'noi politike Rossii (Moscow, 2004), 106 Google Scholar.

16. See, for example, Diligenskii, G., “Druzhit's Amerikoi?,” in Cherniakov, A. A., ed., Desiat’ let sotsiologicheskikh nabliudenii (Moscow, 2003), 430-31Google Scholar; and L. Gudkov, “Ideologema vraga,” in Negativnaia identichnost', 552-649.

17. Zvereva, G., “Diskurs gosudarstvennoi natsii v sovremennoi Rossii,” in Lariuel’, M. [Larruelle, Marlene], ed., Sovremennye interpretatsii russkogo natsionalizma (Stuttgart, 2007), 21 Google Scholar. On 1990s Russian nationalism, see, for example, Thomas Parland, The Extreme Nationalist Threat in Russia: The Growing Influence of Western Rightist Ideas (London, 2005); Viacheslav Likhachev, Natsizm v Rossii (Moscow, 2002); and A. Umland, “Tri raznovidnosti postsovetskogo fashizma: Kontseptsual'nye i kontekstual'nye problemy interpretatsii sovremennogo russkogo ul'tranatsionalizma,” in Lariuel', ed., Sovremennye interpretatsii russkogo natsionalizma, 129-70.

18. Zvereva, “Diskurs gosudarstvennoi natsii,” 41.

19. Voronkov, V. and Karpenko, O., “Patriotizm kak natsionalizm (post)sovetskogo cheloveka,” in Lariuel, ', ed., Sovremennye interpretatsii russkogo natsionalizma, 109 Google Scholar.

20. “It is not surprising that by the end of the 2000s it is precisely young people who take the strong antimodern position: antiwestern, nationalist, and xenophobic attitudes, on the one hand, and a willingness to support a higher authority (the rejection of political alternatives and choices), on the other. Combining these proclivities and assessments has now become a prominent feature in the portrait of the average young person in today's Russia.” L. D. Gudkov, B. V. Dubin, and N. A. Zorkaia, eds., Molodezh’ Rossii (Moscow, 2011), 28.

21. Oleg Mikhalin, “Est’ li v Rossii demokratiia?,” Moscow Post, September 15,2009, at http://www.moscow-post.com/politics/001252991497517/ (last accessed April 30, 2015).

22. Zweynert, Joachim, “Conflicting Patterns of Thought in the Russian Debate on Transition: 2003-2007,” Europe-Asia Studies 62, no. 4 (June 2010): 547–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar. Having analyzed articles and monographs by Russian economists, Zweynert concludes that many antiwestern Russian economists base their preference for a “Russian economic model” on the certainty that “Russians cannot develop fully within the framework of a market economy,” “cannot live without a greater goal,” and give “priority to the interests of the society, rather than individual and collective interests” (55354).

23. Cited in Solovei, V. D., “Revoliutsiia russkoi identichnosti: Rossia dlia russkikh?,” Monitoring obshchestvennogo mneniia 80, no. 4 (October-December 2006): 51–67 Google Scholar.

24. N. P. Popov, “Poiski national ‘noi idei Rossii prodolzhaiutsia,” Russkie.org, November 27, 2009, at http://russkie.org/?module=fullitem&id=16991 (last accessed April 30,2015).

25. Ol‘ga Mozgovaia, “Moskva teper’ provintsii po nravu,” Vecherniaia Moskva, September 7, 2006, at http://vm.ru/news/2006/09/07/moskva-teper-provintsii-po-nravu-26646.html (last accessed April 30, 2015); Aleksandra Maiantseva, “Provintsialy ne liubiat moskvichei,” Komsomolskaia Pravda, August 31, 2013, at http://www.msk.kp.ru/daily/26126/3018983/ (last accessed April 30,2015).

26. See, for example, the discussion page “Pro moskvichei” on the Internet forum lovehate.ru, athttp://www.lovehate.ru/Muscovites/12 (last accessed April 30, 2015). “A fifth of Russians believe Muscovites to be proud and arrogant. Ten percent of respondents believe that the residents of the capital are greedy and avaricious. Many respondents believe that uncultured and rude people live in Moscow.” Maiantseva, “Provintsialy ne liubiat moskvichei.”

27. Lounsbery, “‘No, This Is Not the Provinces!,’” 266.

28. Zaionts, L. O., “Russkii provintsial'nyi ‘mif’ (k probleme kul'turnoi tipologii),” in Zaionts, L. O., ed., Geopanorama russkoi kul'tury: Provintsiia i ee lokal'nye teksty (Moscow, 2004), 427–56Google Scholar.

29. Etkind, Aleksandr, “Fuko i tezis vnutrennei kolonizatsii: Postkolonial'nyi vzgliad na sovetskoe proshloe,” Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie 49 (2001): 72 Google Scholar.

30. “It becomes clear once again that ‘the provinces’ of the mainstream Russian literary tradition are a cultural construct, not an unproblematic reflection of reality.” Lounsbery, “‘No, This Is Not the Provinces!,’” 263nl2. For more on this, see Irina Shevelenko, “Reprezentatsiia imperii i natsii: Rossiia na Vsemirnoi vystavke 1900 goda v Parizhe,” in A. Etkind, D. Uffel'mann, and I. Kukulin, eds., Tam vnutri: Praktiki vnutrennei kolonizatsii v kul'turnoi istorii Rossii (Moscow, 2012), 413-44.

31. Edward W. Said, Culture and Imperialism (New York, 1993), 16.

32. M. L. Spivak, “‘Provintsiia idet v regiony’: O nekotorykh osobennostiakh sovremennogo upotrebleniia slova ‘provintsiia,’” in Zaionts, ed., Geopanorama russkoi kul'tury, 54.

33. See, for example D. Kuz'min, ed., Nestolkhnaia literatura: Poeziia i proza regionov Rossii (Moscow, 2001); Elena I. Trofimova, “Zhenskaia literatura i knigoizdanie v sovremennoi Rossii,” Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost', no. 5 (1998): 147-56; and Sutcliffe, Benjamin M., The Prose of Life: Russian Women Writers from Khrushchev to Putin (Madison, 2009), 177n2 Google Scholar.

34. 0. Bule [Boele], “Boris Nemtsov—provintsial: K voprosu o politicheskom imidzmeikerstve v postperestroechnoi Rossii,” in Belousov and Tsiv'ian, eds., Russkaia provintsiia, 118-28. See also Boris Nemtsov's autobiographical works, Provintsial (Moscow, 1997) and Provintsial v Moskve (Moscow, 1999).

35. “Pis'ma iz provintsii,” Rossiia—Kul'tura, at http://tvkultura.ru/brand/show/brand_id/20920 (last accessed June 5,2015).

36. A. Popov, “Novyi fil'm Kirilla Serebrennikova ‘Iur'ev den” vykhodit v prokat 18 sentiabria,” ProfiCinema, September 10, 2008, 27, at http://www.proficinema.ru/news/detail.php?ID=37159 (last accessed April 26, 2015); A. Plakhov, “An Ironical Collectivist Community (sobornost’),” Kinokultura 22 (October 2008), at http://www.kinokultura.com/2008/22r-yuriev-ap.shtml (last accessed April 26, 2015).

37. Oleg Zintsov, “Ee krepost',” Vedomosti, September 19,2008 at http://www.vedomosti.ru/newspaper/articles/2008/09/19/ee-krepost (last accessed April 26, 2015).

38. This ambiguity is reflected even in such basic components as the main characters’ identities: the town's police investigator mistakes Liubov’ for someone he knows as a criminal named Liudmila/Liusia, and before long she begins using that name herself; the police investigator turns out to be a former criminal; and for the purpose of finding her son, the heroine is constantly being asked to identify various people as him—that is, her son, too, has numerous incarnations.

39. This representation of the provinces speaks both to the uses of the provincial myth and to its imperial essence: “The provinces—this is the capital's term for the marginal territories, the gaze (and edictal gesture) from the center, and from the top down. The term can be scornful, condescending, and even moving to tears, [but] it doesn't alter the disposition of the relations…. After all, the provinces are not tangible matter but merely an attribute of the imperial spatial structure.” Vladimir Abashev, Viacheslav Rakov, Andrei Matveev, Dmitrii Kharitonov, and Nikolai Koliada, “Liricheskuiu repliku Vitalii Kapil'di ‘Provintsiia kak fenomen kul'turnogo separatizma’ obsuzhdaiut Vladimir Abashev, Viacheslav Rakov, Andrei Matveev, Dmitrii Kharitonov, Nikolai Koliada,” Ural'skaia Nov', no. 1 (2000), at http://magazines.russ.ru/urnov/2000/l/otklik.html (last accessed April 26,2015).

40. Taylor, Richard, “‘But Eastward, Look, the Land is Brighter’: Toward a Topography of Utopia in the Stalinist Musical,” in Dobrenko, Evgeny and Naiman, Eric, eds., The Landscape of Stalinism: The Art and Ideology of Soviet Space (Seattle, 2003), 201–18Google Scholar; Birgit Beumers, “The Serialization of Culture, or The Culture of Serialization,” in Birgit Beumers, Stephen C. Hutchings, and Natalia Rulyova, eds., The Post-Soviet Russian Media: Conflicting Signals (London, 2008), 167.

41. Svetlana Stepnova, “Moia prekrasnaia palata no. 6,” review of Glianets (2007, dir. Andrei Konchalovskii), ruskino.ru, August 27,2007, at http://ruskino.ru/review/141 (last accessed April 26, 2015).

42. See Elsaesser, Thomas, “Tales of Sound and Fury: Observations on the Family Melodrama,” in Grant, Barry Keith, ed., Film Genre Reader, vol. 3 (Austin, 2003), 366–95Google Scholar; and Rowe, Kathleen, The Unruly Woman: Gender and the Genres of Laughter (Austin, 1995)Google Scholar.

43. Official website of actor Kirill Zhandarov, at http://zhandarov.ru/cinema/provincial (last accessed April 26, 2015).

44. Rowe, The Unruly Woman, 99.

45. On the “nonexistent ideal Moscow,” see MacFadyen, David, Russian Television Today: Primetime Drama and Comedy (London, 2008), 124 Google Scholar.

46. “Anna Gres': ‘So mnoi “soidet i tak” ne prokhodit, pust’ dazhe kto-to na eto i obizhaetsia,” Telekritika, April 17, 2007, at http://www.telekritika.ua/lyudi/2007-04-17/8729 (last accessed April 26,2015).

47. See Buruma, Ian and Margalit, Avishai, Occidentalism: The West in the Eyes of Its Enemies (New York, 2004)Google Scholar.

48. Lotman, Juri, Culture and Explosion, ed. Grishakova, Marina, trans. Clark, Wilma (Berlin, 2009), 171 Google Scholar.