Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T14:18:01.320Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Problem of the Russian Intelligentsia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 January 2017

Daniel R. Brower
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Historians have little reason to believe that the so-called intelligentsia corresponded to any real group of men in Russian society. It is true that the term has been used very frequently in the past one hundred years, but it has been denned in so many ways and been the subject of such bitter partisan debate that it has lost any objective meaning. Historians in the West can hardly communicate on the subject any longer, for no two of them seem to give the term quite the same meaning. The confusion extends even to terminology. The Russian word intelligentsiia has passed directly into the English language as a collective noun. But what then is the term for the individual—intelligent or intellectual? Some historians carefully use the Russian noun; others accept the English noun as the approximate equivalent.

Type
Notes and Comments
Information
Slavic Review , Volume 26 , Issue 4 , December 1967 , pp. 638 - 647
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Slavic, East European, and Eurasian Studies. 1967

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Allan, Pollard, “The Russian Intelligentsia California Slavic Studies, III (Berkeley, 1964), 8–19.Google Scholar

2 Ibid., pp. 22-23.

3 Ibid.

4 Struve, , “Intelligentsiia i revoliutsiia in Vekhi (Moscow, 1909), p. 160.Google Scholar

5 See. for example, Intelligentsiia v Rossii (St. Petersburg, 1910).

6 Ivanov-Razumnik, R. V., Istoriia russkoi obshchestvennoi mysli (Petrograd, 1918), I, 13–21.Google Scholar

7 Ovsianiko-Kulikovskii, D. N., “Istoriia russkoi intelligentsii,” in Sobranie sochinenii (St. Petersburg, 1911), IX, 223.Google Scholar

8 Gershenzon, , Istoriia molodoi Rossii (St. Petersburg, 1908), p. iii.Google Scholar 9 McConnell, Allen, “The Origin of the Russian Intelligentsia,” Slavic and East European Journal, VIII (Spring. 1964), 6.Google Scholar

10 Malia, , “What Is the Intelligentsia?” in The Russian Intelligentsia, ed. Richard Pipes (New York, 1961), p. 3.Google Scholar

11 Aleksandr, Gertsen, Byloe i dumy (Moscow, 1962), I, 364.Google Scholar

12 Malia, pp. 5-7.

13 George, Fischer, “The Intelligentsia and Russia in The Transformation of Russia, ed. Cyril Black (New York, 1960), pp. 262–63.Google Scholar

14 Billington, , The Icon and the Axe (New York, 1966), p. 233; also pp. 387-90.Google Scholar

15 Ibid., p. 327.

16 Ibid., p. 456.

17 Raeff, “Some Reflections on Russian Liberalism,” The Russian Review, XVIII (July 1959), 228. Raeff seems to use this concept, though never spelled out, in his recent work, Origins of the Russian Intelligentsia : The Eighteenth-Century Nobility (New York, 1966), esp. pp. 168-69.

18 Tompkins, , The Russian Intelligentsia (Norman, Oklahoma, 1957), p. 245.Google Scholar

19 Montesquieu, , Les Lettres persanes (Paris, 1929), I, 55–56 (Letter 24).Google Scholar

20 Shtrange, M. M., Demokraticheskaia intelligentsiia Rossii v XVIII veke (Moscow, 1965).Google Scholar

21 V. R. Leikina-Svirskaia, “Formirovanie raznochinskoi intelligentsii v Rossii v 40-kh godakh XIX veka,” Istoriia SSSR, Jan.-Feb. iqt﹜8, po. 83-104.

22 Billington, p. 233.

23 Raeff, Origins, pp. 9-10.

24 Leikina-Svirskaia, pp. 103-4.

25 R. Feldmesser, “Social Classes and Political Structure,” in The Transformation of Russia, p. 238.

26 See, for example, James, Coleman, ed., Education and Political Development (Princeton, 1965), pp. 370–71, 498-503.Google Scholar

27 W. O. Aydelotte, “Quantification in History,” American Historical Review, LXXI (April 1966), 813-14.

28 See Yinger, J. M., “Contraculture and Subculture in Approaches, Contexts, and Problems of Social Psychology, ed. Sampson, Edward E. (Englewood Cliffs, N. J., 1964), pp. 467–68.Google Scholar

29 Lerner, The Passing of Traditional Society (New York, 1964), pp. 369-74.

30 See, for example, ibid., pp. 237-39; Cyril Black, The Dynamics of Modernization (New York, 1966), pp. 63-65.