Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T21:48:03.515Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Micro-Periodization and Dynasticism: Was There a Divide in the Reign of Ivan the Terrible?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 January 2017

Sergei Bogatyrev
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this article, Sergei Bogatyrev offers new insight into the problem of continuity and change during the reign of Ivan IV the Terrible by focusing on the micro-periodization of dynastic history. In modern cultural and historical studies, periodization often includes micro-periods that are based on the perceptions of contemporaries. A micro-period can open a longer historical period, mark dramatic events, or reflect day-to-day activities. Bogatyrev argues that the 1550s was an important micro-period in the dynastic history of Ivan IV's Muscovy. The dynasty was in the center of many political and cultural projects of the 1550s, including the relations between the tsar and his cousin Vladimir of Staritsa, redefining the mechanism of succession, and formulating a dynastic vision of Muscovy's past. The micro-periodization of dynastic history reveals important developments that may be easily obscured by the traditional division of Ivan's reign into good and bad halves.

Type
Forum: Divides and Ends Periodizing the Early Modern in Russian History
Information
Slavic Review , Volume 69 , Issue 2 , Summer 2010 , pp. 398 - 409
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Slavic, East European, and Eurasian Studies. 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Corfield, Penelope J., Time and the Shape of History (New Haven, 2007), 188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

2. Fennell, J. L. I., ed., Prince A. M. Kurbsky's History of Ivan TV (Cambridge, Eng., 1965), 152-58.Google Scholar The problem of History s authorship is irrelevant here.

3. Karamzin, N. M., Istoriia gosudarstva Rossiiskogo, book 2 (St. Petersburg, 1842; reprint, Moscow, 1989)Google Scholar, vol. 8, and book 3 (St. Petersburg, 1843; reprint, Moscow, 1989), vol. 9.

4. Zimin, A. A., Reformy Ivana Groznogo. Ocherki sotsial'no-ekonomicheskoi i politicheskoi istorii Rossii serediny XVI v. (Moscow, 1960)Google Scholar; Zimin, , Oprichnina Ivana Groznogo (Moscow, 1964)Google Scholar.

5. See the treatment of the 1550s in Floria, B. N., Ivan Groznyi, 2d ed. (Moscow, 2002), 28–136 Google Scholar; Andrei Pavlov and Maureen Perrie, Ivan the Terrible (London, 2003), 55 - 106, esp. 94–95; Madariaga, Isabel de, Ivan the Terrible, First Tsar of Russia (New Haven, 2005), 60–159 Google Scholar; Viacheslav Shaposhnik, Ivan Groznyi: Pervyi russkii tsar’ (St. Petersburg, 2006), 80–203.

6. Grobovsky, Antony N., The “Chosen Council” of Ivan TV: A Reinterpretation (Brooklyn, N.Y., 1969)Google Scholar; Carolyn Johnston Pouncy, “'The Blessed Sil'vestr’ and the Politics of Invention in Muscovy, 1545–1700,” in Nancy Shields Kollmann and others, eds., Kameri Kraeug“l'n“: Rhetoric of the Medieval Slavic World: Essays Presented to Edward L. Keenan on His Sixtieth Birthday by His Colleagues and Students (Cambridge, Mass., 1995), 548–72; A. I. Filiushkin, Istoriia odnoi mistifikatsii: Ivan Groznyi i “Izbrannaia Rada” (Moscow, 1998).

7. Corfield, Time and the Shape of History, 202.

8. Pavlov and Perrie, Ivan the Terrible, 76–77, 131.

9. See Richard Hellie, “What Happened? How Did He Get Away With It? Ivan Groznyi's Paranoia and the Problem of Institutional Restraints,” Russian History/Histoire Russel4, nos. 1–4 (1987): 199–224; Nancy Shields Kollmann, Kinship and Politics: The Making of the Muscovite Political System, 1345–1547 (Stanford, 1987), 23; Kollmann, "Odd Man Out: Ivan rV's Violence in the Context of Muscovite Judicial Practice" (paper presented at the American Association for the Advancement of Slavic Studies national convention, Philadelphia, 20–23 November 2008). For a reassessment of the problem of Ivan's madness, see Charles J. Halperin, “Ivan IV's Insanity,” Festschrift for Richard Hellie, pt. 1, Russian History/Histoire RusseM, nos. 1–4 (2007): 207–18.

10. Robert O. Crummey, “Reform under Ivan TV: Gradualism and Terror,” in Robert O. Crummey, ed., Reform in Russia and the U.S.S.R.: Past and Prospects (Urbana, 1989), 21–22.

11. Jameson, Fredric, Postmodernism, or, The Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism (London, 1991), 282 Google Scholar. See also Fredricjameson, ThePolilical Unconscious: Narrative as a Socially Symbolic Act (London, 1981), 27–28.

12. Corfield, Time and the Shape of History, 203.

13. Stein, Richard L., Victoria's Year: English Literature and Culture, 1837–1838 (New York, 1987), 4.Google Scholar

14. Marshall, Peter, “The Crisis of 1536,” in Doran, Susan, ed., Henry VIII: Man and Monarch (London, 2009), 163-65.Google Scholar

15. Kozliakov, Viacheslav, Mikhail Fedorovich (Moscow, 2004), 163-83.Google Scholar

16. M. M. Krom, “Kponimaniiu moskovskoi ‘politiki’ XVI v.: Diskurs i praktika Rossiiskoi pozdnesrednevekovoi monarkhii,” Odissei: Chelovekvistorii, 2005 (Moscow, 2005), 284.

17. On the impact of Marc Bloch's and Michel Foucault's ideas on the problem of periodization, see Lawrence Besserman, “The Challenge of Periodization: Old Paradigms and New Perspectives,” in Lawrence Besserman, ed., The Challenge of Periodization: Old Paradigms and Neiu Perspectives (New York, 1996), 11–19.

18. Similarly, A. L. Khoroshkevich speaks about a long middle of the sixteenth century spanning from Ivan IV's coronation in 1547 to 1570, which was the eve of the Crimean Tatars’ devastating attack on Moscow and the abolishment of the Oprichnina. Khoroshkevich, however, accepts the traditional juxtaposition of the period of reforms and the Oprichnina. A. L. Khoroshkevich, Rossiia v sisteme mezhdunarodnykh otnoshenii serediny XVI veka (Moscow, 2003), 5. See also Konstantin Erusalimskii's review of Khoroshkevich's book: “Ot istorii rossiiskoi diplomatii k diplomaticheskoi istorii Rossii: Novaia kontseptsiia rossiiskoi politiki serediny XVI veka,” Sotsium: Al'manakh sotsial'noi istorii 5 (2005): 264.

19. See various approaches to structuring Muscovite history in the following general works: Robert Crummey, The Formation of Muscovy, 1304–1613 (London, 1987) (based on military, political, and dynastic history); Kaiser, Daniel H. and Marker, Gary, eds., Reinterpreting Russian History: Readings, 860–1860s (New York, 1994), 79–222 (dynastic and legal history)Google Scholar; Martin, Janet, Medieval Russia, 980–1584 (Cambridge, Eng., 1995) (dynastic, political, economic history)Google Scholar; Ostrowski, Donald G., Muscovy and the Mongols: Cross-Cultural Influences on the Steppe Frontier, 1304–1589 (Cambridge, Eng., 1998), 16–17 (dynastic and ecclesiastical history)Google Scholar; Catherine Evtuhov, David Goldfrank, Lindsey Hughes, and Richard Stites, A History of Russia: Peoples, Legends, Events, Forces (Boston, 2004), 98–138 (dynastic and political history); Maureen Perrie, ed., The Cambridge History ofRussia, vo). \, From Early Rus’ to 1689 (Cambridge, Eng., 2006), 158–662 (regional and dynastic history).

20. Rowen, Herbert H., The King's State: Proprietary Dynasticism in Early Modern France (New Brunswick, N.J., 1980), 1 Google Scholar. See also Guy Rowlands, The Dynastic State and the Army under Louis XIV: Royal Service and Private Interest, 1661–1701 (Cambridge, Eng., 2002), 9.

21. Janet Martin pioneered this trend in her Medieval Russia, 333–40. See also Isolde Thyret, Between Cod and Tsar: Religious Symbolism and the Royal Women of Muscovite Russia (DeKalb, 2001); Thyret, “The Cultural Politics of the Grand Princesses of Moscow and the Emergence of the Muscovite Dynasty,” Festschrift for Ingham, Norman W., Russian History/ Histoire Russe 33, nos. 2–4 (2006): 333-53Google Scholar; Sergei Bogatyrev, “Reinventing the Russian Monarchy in the 1550s: Ivan the Terrible, the Dynasty, and the Church,” Slavonic and East European Review 85, no. 2 (2007): 271–93; Bogatyrev, “Ivan the Terrible Discovers the West: The Cultural Transformation of Autocracy during the Early Northern Wars,” Festschrift for Richard Hellie, pt. 1, Russian History/HistoireRusse 34, nos. 1–4 (2007): 161–88.

22. See Rowen, King's State; Rowlands, Dynastic Slate; Braddick, Michael J., State Formation in Early Modern England, c. 1550–1700 (Cambridge, Eng., 2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Ostrowski, Donald, “The Growth of Muscovy, 1462–1533,” in Perrie, Cambridge History of Russia, 1:213, 239 Google Scholar; Bogatyrev, “Reinventing the Russian Monarchy,” 293.

23. Rowlands, Dynastic State, 10.

24. Jaroslaw Pelenski, Russia and Kazan': Conquest and Imperial Ideology, 1438- 1560s (The Hague, 1974); Sergei Bogatyrev, “Battle for Divine Wisdom: The Rhetoric of Ivan IV's Campaign against Polotsk,” in Eric Lohr and Marshall Poe, eds., The Military and Society in Russia, 1450–1917 (Leiden, 2002), 349.

25. Rowlands, Dynastic State, 11; Ostrowski, Muscovy and the Mongols, 1n1, 136–37.

26. Kallmann, Kinship and Politics, 155–59; Martin, Medieval Russia, 248, 333–34.

27.

28. Catalano, Pierangelo and Pašuto, Vladimir T., eds., L'idea di Roma a Mosca secoli XV-XVI: Fonti per la storia del pensiero sociale russo (Rome, 1989), 78–95 Google Scholar. On the dating of the formulaic redaction, see Bogatyrev, “Ivan the Terrible,” 168.

29. Nasonov, A. N., ed., Pskovskieletopisi (Moscow, 1941), 1:83 (Pskovl chronicle)Google Scholar. See also Alekseev, Iu. G., Gosudar’ vseiaRusi (Novosibirsk, 1991), 206-7.Google Scholar

30. Martin, Medieval Russia, 248.

31. See Rovven, King's State, 53, 95.

32. All these political complications accompanied the dynastic crisis of 1682, which resulted in the dual rule of Aleksei Mikhailovich s sons from different wives, Peter I and Ivan V, and the regency of Sophia.

33. Sbornik hnperatorskogo Russkogo istoricheskogo obshchestva (St. Petersburg, 1883), 38:6; George Vernadsky, ed., A Source Book for Russian History from Early Times to 1917 (New Haven, 1972), 1:152. For the chronicle, see Polnoe sobranie nisskikh letopisei (hereafter PSRL) (Moscow, 2000), 13.1: 237n5; Bogatyrev, “Reinventing the Russian Monarchy,” 273, 277–79.

34.

35. Sbornik hnperatorskogo Russkogo istoricheskogo obshchestva (St. Petersburg, 1887), 59:228.

36. Bushkovitch, Paul, “Princes Cherkasskii or Circassian Murzas: The Kabardians in the Russian Boyar Elite, 1560–1700,” Cahiers du Monde nisse 45, nos. 1–2 (2004): 13–15 Google Scholar. Nothing supports S. B. Veselovskii's speculation that Ivan's marriage to Mariia was engineered by the Zakhar'in's boyars. S. B. Veselovskii, Issledovaniia po istorii oprichniny (Moscow, 1963), 296.

37. Antonov, A. V., “Poruchnye zapisi 1527–1571 godov,” Russkii diplomatarii 10 (2004): 22, 23, 25, 27Google Scholar. After his premature death on 4 May 1563, Vasilii was buried in the royal mausoleum in the Archangel Cathedral. PSRL, 13.2: 365, 366.

38. On the political function of the rhetoric of reconciliation in the 1550s, see Sergei Bogatyrev, “Ivan IV, 1533–1584,” in Perrie, Cambridge History of Russia, 1:247–48.

39. Christian Raffensperger, “Comparative Rulership in Rus’ and Scandinavia” (paper, American Association for the Advancement of Slavic Studies, Philadelphia, 20–23 November 2008), 9.

40. Ostrowski, Donald, “Where Was Riurik's First Seat according to the Povest’ vremennykh let?” Drevniaia Rus': Voprosy medievistiki 3 (33) (September 2008): 48 Google Scholar.

41. S. M. Kashtanov, ed., Rossiia i Grecheskii mir v XVIveke (Moscow, 2004), 1:398–400. For more on the tsar's memorial list, see Bogatyrev, “Reinventing the Russian Monarchy,“ 289–90.

42. Ol'ga V. Novokhatko, Razriad v 185 godu (Moscow, 2007).

43. See Bogdanov, A. P., Tsar’ Fedor Alekseevich (Moscow, 1998)Google Scholar; Sedov, P. V., ZakatMoskovskogo tsarstva: Tsarskii dvor kontsa XVII veka (St. Petersburg, 2008 Google Scholar

44. The oft-quoted episode with granting the title of grand prince to Simeon Bekbulatovich in 1575–76 was in fact not abdication, but an exercise in dynastic politics with the purpose of lowering Simeon's dynastic status. See Bogatyrev, “Ivan IV, 1533–1584,“ 260–61.

45. Floria, Ivan Groznyi, 371–73.

46. See Sergei Bogatyrev, “The Book of Degrees of the Royal Genealogy: The Stabilisation of the Text and the Argument from Silence” in the forthcoming book edited by Ann Kleimola and Gail Lenhoff in the series UCLA Slavic Studies, n.s. 7.

47. See Priscilla Hunt, “Ivan IV's Personal Mythology of Kingship,” Slavic Review 52, no. 4 (Winter 1993): 769–809; A. L. lurganov, “Oprichnina i strashnyi sud,” Otechestvennaia istoriia, 1997, no. 3: 52–75; lurganov, Kategoriirusskoisrednevekovoikuitury (Moscow, 1998), 382–98; A. A. Bulychev, Mezhdu sviatymi i demonami: Zametki o posmertnoi sud'be opal'nykh tsarialvana Groznogo (Moscow, 2005). On apocalyptism in the 1550s, see Bogatyrev, Sergei, “The Heavenly Host and the Sword of Truth: Apocalyptic Imagery in Ivan IV's Muscovy,” in Kivelson, Valerie, Petrone, Karen, Kollmann, Nancy Shields, and Flier, Michael S., eds., The New Muscovite Cultural History: A Collection in Honor of Daniel B. Roxuland (Bloomington, 2009), 77–90.Google Scholar

48. Corfield, Time and the Shape of History, 57.

49. Ibid., 79.