Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T04:11:04.273Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

M. N. Pokrovsky and Soviet Historiography: Some Reconsiderations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 January 2017

Bernard W. Eissenstat
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

One of the most interesting and seminal figures in Soviet historiography is the historian M. N. Pokrovsky, whose influence has continued to be felt up to the present day. He was active in the 1917 Revolution in Russia, and in political and institutional developments during the first decade and a half of Soviet rule. He became what may be euphemistically called the "dean" of Marxist historians, yet after his death on April 10, 1932, he was ritually accused of being responsible for most of the "shortcomings" of Soviet historiography. Among the many accusations leveled against Pokrovsky the following have appeared with considerable regularity: (1) Because he was "dictator" of the historical front from 1928 to 1932, his interpretations of history were the "official" interpretations of that time and consequently had to be "reflected" by other Soviet historians.

Type
Articles
Information
Slavic Review , Volume 28 , Issue 4 , December 1969 , pp. 604 - 618
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Slavic, East European, and Eurasian Studies. 1969

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Jonas, Hans, “Die Entwicklung der Geschichtsforschung im der Soviet-Union seit dem Ausgang des Weltkrieges,” Zeitschrift fiir osteuropädische Geschichte, 5 (1931): 67.Google Scholar

2. Shteppa, Konstantin F., Russian Historians and the Soviet State (New Brunswick, 1962), p. 1962 Google Scholar, and Yaresh, Leo A., Two Essays in Soviet Historiography (New York, 1955), p. 3.Google Scholar

3. Jesse Clarkson to Bernard W. Eissenstat, Nov. 3, 1966. Hoetzsch argued the same line over a quarter of a century earlier, asserting that Pokrovsky, while holding a number of high government posts, “was never a member of the inner circle of the party.” Hoetzsch, Otto, “M. N. Pokrovsky,” Zeitschrift fiir osteuropäische Geschichte, 6 (1932): 533.Google Scholar

4. Shteppa, Russian Historians, pp. 24-178 and passim.

5. Frankel, Jonathan, “Party Genealogy and the Soviet Historians (1920-1938),” Slavic Review, 25, no. 4 (December 1966): 570–71 CrossRefGoogle Scholar and passim.

6. Illeritsky, V. E. and Kudriavtsev, I. A., eds., Istoriografiia istorii SSSR (Moscow, 1961), p. 18.Google Scholar

7. Miliukov, Paul, “Velichie i radenie M. N. Pokrovskogo,” Sovremennie sapiski (Paris), 65 (1937): 370.Google Scholar

8. Jonas, “Entwicklung der Geschichtsforschung,” pp. 395-96.

9. Pokrovsky, M. N., Ekonomicheskii materialism (Moscow, 1906), p. 3.Google Scholar

10. Pokrovsky, , Historische Aufsätse: Ein Sammelband (Vienna and Berlin, 1928), p. Berlin.Google Scholar

11. Pokrovsky, , Russkaia istoriia v samom sshatom ocherke, 3rd ed. (Moscow, 1923), P.11.Google Scholar

12. Pokrovsky, , “Marks kak istorik,” Vestnik Sotsialisticheskoi akademii, 1923, no. 4, p. 380.Google Scholar

13. Pokrovsky, , History of Russia: From Earliest Times to the Rise of Commercial Capitalism, trans, and ed. Clarkson, J. D. and Griffiths, M. R. M. (London, 1931), pp. 177–79 Google Scholar, and A Brief History of Russia, trans. D. S. Mirsky, 2 vols. (New York, 1933), 1: 176

14. Pokrovsky, “Rol’ rabochego klassa v revoliutsii 1905 g.,” in Tikhomirov, M. N. et al., eds., M. N. Pokrovskii: Izbrannye proisvedeniia, 4 vols. (Moscow, 1966-67), 3: 606–7.Google Scholar

15. Pokrovsky, “O riisskom feodalizme, proiskhozhdenii i kharaktere absoliutizma v Rossii,” ibid., 3: 560.

16. Pokrovsky, , “O zadachakh marksistskoi istoricheskoi nauki v rekonstruktivnyi period,” Istorik marksist, 31 (1931): 7.Google Scholar

17. Pokrovsky, , Oktiabrskaia revoliutsiia: Sbornik statei, 1917-1927 (Moscow, 1929), p. 18.Google Scholar

18. Pokrovsky, Berzin, M. la., et al., eds., Meshdunarodnye otnosheniia v epoku iviperialisma: 1878-1917, 10 vols. (Moscow, 1931-39), 1: xiii.Google Scholar

19. Wolfe, Bertram D., Six Keys to the Soviet System (Boston, 1956), p. 46.Google Scholar

20. Quoted in Danilov, V. P. and Iakubovskaia, S. I., “Istochnikovedenie i izuchenie istorii sovetskogo obshchestva,” Voprosy istorii, 1961, no. 5, p. 18.Google Scholar

21. Quoted in Mazour, Anatole G., “Modern Russian Historiography,” Journal of Modern History, 9 (1937): 201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar No source given.

22. Pokrovsky, , “Rech\” Istorik-marksist, 10 (1928): 272.Google Scholar

23. Pokrovsky, , “Institut krasnoi professury,” Trudy Institute krasnoi professury (Moscow, 1923), 1: 5.Google Scholar

24. Mazour, Anatole G., Modern Russian Historiography, 2nd ed. (Princeton, 1958), p. 187–90.Google Scholar

25. Pokrovsky, in Vestnik Kommunisticheskoi akadetnii, 26 (1928): 5-6. Quoted in Sokolov, O. D., “Razvitie istoricheskikh vzgliadov M. N. Pokrovskogo,” in M. N. Pokrovskii: Isbrannye proisvedeniia, 1: 28 Google Scholar

26. See, for example, Grekov, B. D., Bor'ba Rusi za sosdanie svoego gosudarstva (Moscow, 1945), pp. 22 ff., Google Scholar and Mavrodin, V. V., “Osnovnye momenty razvitiia russkogo gosudarstva do XVIII v.,” Vestnik Leningradskogo universiteta, 1947, no. 3, p. 84.Google Scholar

27. Nechkina, M., Poliakov, Iu., and Cherepnin, L., “Nekotorye voprosy istorii sovetskoi istoricheskoi nauki,” Kommunist, 1961, no. 9, p. 65.Google Scholar

28. Sakharov, A. M. and Shapiro, A. L., “Sovetskaia literatura po problemam istorii russkogo feodalizma v 1962 g.,” Istoriia SSSR, 1963, no. 4, pp. 139–40.Google Scholar

29. Dubrovsky, S. M., “Akademik M. N. Pokrovskogo ego rol’ v razvitii sovetskoi istoricheskoi nauki,” Voprosy istorii, 1962, no. 3, p. 17.Google Scholar

30. Yaresh, Leo, “The Problem of Periodization,” in Black, Cyril E., ed., Rewriting Russian History, 2nd ed. (New York, 1962), p. 34.Google Scholar

31. “Pis'mo V. I. Lenina M. N. Pokrovskomu,” in M. N. Pokrovskii: Izbrannye proievedeniia, 3: 3-4.

32. Rozhkov, N. A., Russkaia istoriia v sravnitel'no-istoricheskom osveshchenii, 12 vols. (Leningrad, 1922-30), 1: 21.Google Scholar

33. A. S. Roslova, “Formirovanie vzgliadov M. N. Pokrovskogo i ego istoricheskaia kontseptsiia,” in Istoriografiia istorii SSSR, p. 474.

34. Pankratova, A. M. in Grekov, B. D. et al., eds., Protiv istoricheskoi kontseptsii M. N. Pokrovskogo, 2 vols. (Moscow, 1939-40), 1: 62–63.Google Scholar

35. Pokrovsky, , “Sovetskaia glava nashei istorii,” Bolshevik, 1924, no. 14, p. 11.Google Scholar

36. Pokrovsky, , Istoricheskaia nauka i bofba klassov, 2 vols. (Moscow, 1933), 2: 314.Google Scholar

37. Marx, Karl, Capital, ed. Rhys, Ernest, trans. Eden, and Paul, Cedar, 2 vols. (New York, 1930), 1: 391.Google Scholar

38. Lenin, V. I., “Krakh II internatsionala,” Sobranie sochinenii, 20 vols. (Moscow, 1920-26), 13: 160.Google Scholar