Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T06:43:43.528Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Kant's Future: Debates about the Identity of Kaliningrad Oblast

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 February 2019

Miłosz J. Zieliński
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article addresses the role that the legacy of the pre- and post-WWII past has played in ongoing identity debates among the inhabitants of Kaliningrad oblast of the Russian Federation. Since 1991, interest in preserving this legacy has been on the rise, influencing the inhabitants’ feeling of regional distinctiveness in numerous ways. While the pre-war legacy is important for a considerable number of Kaliningraders, others believe that it threatens the Russian and Soviet mien of the Oblast, both in cultural and political terms. They favor taking greater care of Soviet-era buildings, monuments, and other commemorations of war heroes. This viewpoint disparity has recently widened due to both internal and external factors, including the deterioration of Russo-western relations. A March 2015 incident in the village of Veselovka is used to reflect upon the way in which pre-war and post-war legacies are used in the above-mentioned identity debate. The author examines the direction of identity construction in the oblast through the officially-acknowledged vision of Russianness as pursued by President Vladimir Putin, in particular, and the Russian government, in general.

Type
Managing Regional Diversity
Information
Slavic Review , Volume 77 , Issue 4 , Winter 2018 , pp. 937 - 956
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Slavic, East European, and Eurasian Studies 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

This article is a part of the research project entitled “Identity of the inhabitants of the Kaliningrad Oblast since 1991 to present day: constitutive factors and direction of ongoing changes.” The project has been financed by the National Science Centre (project number: 2014/13/N/HS6/04214) within the framework of the PRELUDIUM program, as well as a part of author's PhD research on the same subject. Both projects were concluded in 2017. The views expressed in this article are those of the author and do not represent any institution which he is affiliated with.

References

1. See Isaacs, Rico and Polese, Abel, eds., Nation-Building and Identity in the Post-Soviet Space: New Tools and Approaches (London, 2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Marciniak, Włodzimierz, Rozgrabione imperium: Upadek Związku Sowieckiego i powstanie Federacji Rosyjskiej (Krakow, 2001)Google Scholar; Bernhard, Michael H. and Kubik, Jan eds., Twenty Years after Communism: The Politics of Memory and Commemoration (New York, 2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

2. Makarychev, Andrey and Yatsyk, Alexandra, eds., Mega Events in Post-Soviet Eurasia: Shifting Borderlines of Inclusion and Exclusion (New York, 2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

3. See Anderson, Benedict, Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism (Rev. ed.) (London, 2006)Google Scholar; Lane, David, ed., Elites and Identities in Post-Soviet Space (London, 2012)Google Scholar; Bassin, Mark and Pozo, Gonzalo eds., The Politics of Eurasianism: Identity, Popular Culture and Russia’s Foreign Policy (London, 2017)Google Scholar.

4. Ehala, Martin, “Blurring of Collective Identities in the Post-Soviet Space,” Sociolinguistic Studies, 9 (August 2015): 173–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Kolossov, Vladimir, “Ethnic and Political Identities and Territorialities in the Post-Soviet Space,” GeoJournal 48, no. 2 (June 1999): 71–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Herrschel, Tassilo, Borders in Post-socialist Europe: Territory, Scale, Society (Burlington, 2011)Google Scholar.

5. Iurii Kostiashov, Povsednevnost΄ poslevoennoi derevni: Iz istorii pereselencheskikh kolkhozov Kaliningradskoi oblasti, 1946–1953 gg. (Moscow, 2015); Kostiashov, Vostochnaya Prussiia glazami sovetskikh pereselentsev: Pervye gody Kaliningradskoi oblasti v vospominaniakh i dokumentakh (Kaliningrad, 2003).

6. Il΄ia Dement΄ev, “Chto ia mogu znat΄?”: Formirovanie diskursov o proshlom v kaliningradskoi oblasti v sovetskii period (konets 1940-kh–1980-e gody),” in Liudi i teksty: Ist. almanakh (Moscow, 2014): 175–218.

7. Ekhard Mattės, Zapreshchennoe vospominanie: Vozvrashchenie istorii Vostochnoi Prussii i regional΄noe soznanie zhitelei Kaliningradskoi oblasti (1945–2001) (Kaliningrad, 2003); Andrzej Sakson, Od Kłajpedy do Olsztyna. Współcześni mieszkańcy byłych Prus Wschodnich: Kraj Kłajpedzki, Obwód Kaliningradzki, Warmia i Mazury (Poznan, 2011).

8. Anna M. Karpenko, Regional΄naia identichnost΄ kak kategoriia politicheskoi praktyki, (PhD diss., In-t filosofii RAN, Moskva, 2008); Karpenko, “Peredacha simvolicheski znachimykh pamiatnikov kul΄turnogo naslediia Kaliningradskoi oblasti v sobstvennost΄ RPTS. Sotsial΄nye i kul΄turnye aspekty konflikta,” Vestnik Rossiiskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta im. I. Kanta, 12 (2010): 92–95; Evgenii A. Maslov, “Zaselenie Kaliningradskoi oblasti i formirovanie religioznoi struktury eë naseleniia,” Baltiiskie issledovaniia, 1 (2002): 17–33; Maslov, Na puti k religioznomu podpol΄iu: Vlast΄ i veruiushchie v Kaliningradskoi oblasti kontsa 1940-kh godov (Kaliningrad, 2006).

9. Ol΄ga Sezneva, “Living in the Russian Present with a German Past: The Problem of Identity in Kaliningrad, Formerly Königsberg,” in David Crowley and Susanne Reid, eds., Socialist Spaces: Sites of Everyday Life in the Eastern Bloc (London, 2002): 47–64; Sezneva, “The Dual History: Politics of the Past in Kaliningrad, Former Koenigsberg,” in John Czaplicka and Blair Ruble, eds., Composing Urban History and the Construction of Civic Identities (Baltimore, 2003): 58–85; Sezneva, “Converting History into ‘Cultural Treasure’ in Post-1991 Kaliningrad: Social Transitions and the Meaning of the Past,” in Klaus Eder and Willfried Spohn, eds., Collective Memory and European Identity: The Effects of Integration and Enlargement (Aldershot, 2005): 151–78; Sezneva, “We Have Never Been German: The Economy of Digging in Russian Kaliningrad,” in Craig Calhoun and Richard Sennett, eds., Practicing Culture (London, 2007): 13–34; Sezneva, “Locating Kaliningrad on the Map of Europe: ‘A Russia in Europe’ or ‘a Europe in Russia’?,” in John Czaplicka, Nida Gelazis, and Blair A. Ruble, eds., Cities after the Fall: European Integration and Urban History (Baltimore, 2009): 195–217; Sezneva, “Modalities of Self-understanding, Identification and Representation in the Post-1991 Kaliningrad: A Critical View,” in Stefan Berger, ed., In Kaliningrad in Europe: Perspectives from Inside and Outside (Lüneburg, 2010): 35–57; Ingmar Oldberg, “The Emergence of a Regional Identity in the Kaliningrad Oblast,” Cooperation and Conflict 3, no. 35 (2000): 269–88.

10. Anssi Paasi, Territories Boundaries and Consciousness: The Changing Geographies of the Finnish-Russian Border (New York, 1995).

11. “Polska Kronika Filmowa 1973, /29a,” YouTube video, posted by “bobcatpoland,” April 16, 2011 at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AfTwgBBbIWA (last accessed May 21, 2018).

12. Stanisław Srokowski, Prusy Wschodnie. Studium geograficzne, gospodarcze i społeczne (Gdańsk, 1945); Srokowski, Miasta i ludzie Prus Wschodnich (Warsaw, 1946); Srokowski, Prusy Wschodnie (Mazury, Warmia, Powiśle) (Warsaw, 1947).

13. Christopher M. Clark, Prusy. Powstanie i upadek. 1600–1947, trans. Jan Szkudliński (Warsaw, 2009), 349–56, 379–85.

14. Many photographs of Heldendenkmäler can be accessed on the website of Deutches Dokumentationszentrum für Kunstgeschichte (Bildarchiv Foto Marburg): www.fotomarburg.de (last accessed October 25, 2018).

15. See Robert Traba, Ostpreußen—die Konstruktion einer deutschen Provinz: Eine Studie zur regionalen und nationalen Identität 1914–1933 (Osnabrück, 2010).

16. Iurii Kostiashov, Sekretnaia istoriia Kaliningradskoi oblasti: Ocherki 1945-1956 gg. (Kaliningrad, 2009), 72.

17. Kostiashov, Iurii, Izgnanie prusskogo dukha: Kak formirovalos΄ istoricheskoe soznanie naseleniia Kaliningradskoi oblasti v poslevoennye gody (Kaliningrad, 2003), 7–80Google Scholar.

18. See Мikhaėl΄ Wieck, Zakat Kёnigsberga: Svidetel΄stvo nemetskogo evreia, trans. Jurij A. Volkov (Kaliningrad, 2015).

19. Igor΄ Rudnikov, “Kenigsberg i sobor. Simvol drevnego goroda ot rozrusheniia spasla mogila Immanuila Kanta,” Novie Kolesa, at http://www.rudnikov.com/article.php?ELEMENT_ID=12274 (last accessed May 21, 2018).

20. Kostiashov, Iurii, Sekretnaia istoriia Kaliningradskoi oblasti: Ocherki 1945–1956 gg. (Kaliningrad, 2009)Google Scholar.

21. “Kaliningradskii Arkhitekturnyi Festival΄ 2010 ‘Nesluchivshcheesia Budushchee’,” Rossiiskaia Arkhitektura at https://archi.ru/events/3714/kaliningradskii-arhitekturnyi-festival-2010-nesluchivsheesya-buduschee (last accessed May 21, 2018).

22. Iurii Kostiashov, Izgnanie prusskogo dukha: Kak formirovalos΄ istoricheskoe soznanie naseleniia Kaliningradskoi oblasti v poslevoennye gody (Kaliningrad, 2003), 7–80.

23. Mikhail Geller, Cogs in the Soviet Wheel: The Formation of Soviet Man (New York, 1988).

24. Olga Sezneva, “Converting History into ‘Cultural Treasure’” and “We Have Never Been German.”

25. “Mitropolit Kirill sovershil chin Velikogo osviashchenie malogo khrama Kafedral΄nogo sobora Khrista Spasitelia g. Kaliningrada—Khrama Voinskoi Slavy,” Khram Sv. Blagovernogo Kniazia Aleksandra Nevskogo, September 27, 2007 at http://www.ubrus.org/news-region-unit/?id=2299 (last accessed May 21, 2018).

26. Irina Sattarova (text), Aleksei Milovanov (photos) “‘Edinaia Rossiia—idite v Rossiiu’: fotoreportazh ‘Novogo Kaliningrada.ru’,” Novii Kaliningrad, December 12, 2009 at https://www.newkaliningrad.ru/news/foto/k994153.html (last accessed May 21, 2018); “UVD priznalo, chto na mitinge bylo 10 tys chelovek,” Novii Kaliningrad, January 30, 2010, at https://www.newkaliningrad.ru/news/incidents/k1017362.html (last accessed May 21, 2018).

27. Anna M. Karpenko, “Peredacha simvolicheski znachimykh pamiatnikov kul΄turnogo naslediia Kaliningradskoi oblasti v sobstvennost΄ RPTS: Sotsial΄nye i kul΄turnye aspekty konflikta,” Vestnik Rossiiskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta im. I. Kanta, 12 (2010): 92–95.

28. Foreign diplomat, interview, Kaliningrad, November 2015.

29. Vsemirnyi Russkii Sobor (VRNS). Opisanie, Russkaia Pravoslavnaia Tserkov΄, at http://www.patriarchia.ru/db/text/77467.html (last accessed May 21, 2018).

30. It is worth noting that the resolution points to the economic dimension of identity changes among the inhabitants of Kaliningrad oblast. By accusing the authorities of promoting imports, it clearly referred to the Special Economic Zone, which started operating in the final month of the Soviet Union. The aim of the zone was to stimulate the region’s economy. Yet, its legal status was mostly used by Russian entrepreneurs to purchase high quality products from abroad, bring them to Kaliningrad oblast with no customs fee, and then re-export them to other parts of Russia. The resolution seems to suggest that foreign companies are blamed for this malfunctioning. This was not the case, as the main beneficiaries were Russian enterprises and private individuals. It shows, however, how vivid the memory of the deep socioeconomic crisis of the early 1990s is and how it is still used in identity discourse.

31. Religions considered indigenous (in the official Russian nomenclature, the word “traditional” is used) for Russia are: Christianity (with particular emphasis on Orthodoxy), Islam, Judaism, and Buddhism.

32. “Rezoliutsia I Kaliningradskogo foruma Vsemirnogo russkogo narodnogo sobora,” Russkaia Pravoslavnaia Tserkov΄, March 14, 2015 at http://www.patriarchia.ru/db/text/4013534.html (last accessed May 21, 2018).

33. “Russkoe Sobranie Kaliningrada: Nashi zadachi,” Ia Rex, September 23, 2015, at http://www.iarex.ru/articles/52023.html (last accessed May 21, 2018).

34. Ukaz Prezidenta Rossiiskoi Federatsii ot 12 maia 2009 g. no 537 “O Strategii natsional΄noi bezopasnosti Rossiiskoi Federatsii do 2020 goda,” at http://kremlin.ru/acts/bank/29277; Ukaz Prezidenta Rossiiskoi Federatsii ot 31 dekabria 2015 goda no 683 “O Strategii natsional΄noi bezopasnosti Rossiiskoi Federatsii,” at http://kremlin.ru/acts/bank/40391; Postanovlenie Pravitel΄stva Rossiiskoi Federatsii ot 30 dekabria 2015 g. no 1493 o gosudarstvennoi programme “Patrioticheskoe vospitanie grazhdan Rossiiskoi Federatsii na 2016–2020 gody, at https://tinyurl.com/y8vy5qtn (last accessed November 6, 2018).”

35. Vladimir Putin, Rossiia sosredotochivaetsia—vyzovy, na kotorye my dolzhny otvetit΄, Izvestia, January 16, 2012 at http://izvestia.ru/news/511884 (last accessed August 19, 2016); Putin, “Rossiia: natsional΄nyi vopros,” Nezavisimaia, January 23, 2012 at http://www.ng.ru/politics/2012-01-23/1_national.html (last accessed May 21, 2018).

36. In Polish, it is informally called retrowersja, which might be directly translated as “retroversion.”

37. Another example of how the East Prussian architectural legacy was incorporated into the official narrative of the history of Poland was the town of Frombork (Frauenburg), located thirty kilometers northeast of Elbląg, founded during the Teutonic Knights’ rule over Prussia. Under the auspices of Polish the communist authorities, the town was revitalized in 1966–73 with the help of 40,000 scouts. The main rationale behind this otherwise surprising move was that Frombork was the place where Nicolaus Copernicus lived. Revitalization was a part of commemorating the 500th anniversary of Copernicus’ birth, who became a prominent figure in the official propaganda of the People’s Republic of Poland about the close ties between Poland and East Prussia. See: “Polska Kronika Filmowa 1973/29a,” YouTube video, posted by “bobcatpoland,” April 16, 2011 at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AfTwgBBbIWA (last accessed May 21, 2018).

38. Miłosz J. Zieliński, “National and Regional Identity in Kaliningrad oblast from the Cross-Border Perspective,” Lithuanian Foreign Policy Review, 34 (2015): 127.

39. Iuliia Paramonova, “Kant—lokh”? Rosbalt, April 10, 2015 at http://www.rosbalt.ru/kaliningrad/2015/04/10/1387526.html (last accessed May 21, 2018).

40. “Tsukanov: Poka v oblasti vmesto tserkvei stoiat kirkhy, sosedi dumaiut, chto eta zemlia mozhet pereiti drugomu gosudarstvu,” Rusbalt, April 6, 2015 at http://www.rosbalt.ru/kaliningrad/2015/04/06/1385387.html (last accessed May 21, 2018).

41. Obtained via Facebook fan page of the Dönhoff Fort.

42. Zieliński, Miłosz J., “Z Kaliningradu na Koenigsberg—zapotrzebowanie społeczne czy marzenie nielicznych? Społeczna inicjatywa zmiany nazwy miasta,” Sprawy Narodowościowe. Seria nowa, 43 (2013): 131–41Google Scholar.

43. The 1946 renaming campaign was not the first one of its kind on the territory of East Prussia. In 1938, the Nazi government decided to change all those toponyms that were not of German origin. See Peteshova, Olga, “K voprosu o toponimicheskom purizme v severo-vostochnoi Prussii pervoi poloviny xx veka,” in Vestnik Baltiiskogo universiteta im. Kanta, vol. 2 (2014): 68–73Google Scholar.

44. Per Broderzen, “Pozovi menia tikho po imeni . . .” : Kampaniia pereimenovanii v Kaliningradskoi oblasti v 1946–1950 gg. v kontekste kaliningradsko-moskovskikx otnoshenii poslevoennogo vremeni,” in Baltiiskii region v istorii Rossii i Evropy: Materialy mezhdunarodnoi konferentsii. Kaliningrad, 29–30 oktiabria 2004 g. (Kaliningrad, 2005): 201–10.

45. “Sotsiolog Efim Fidria: “My stali sil΄nee oshchushchat΄ sebia rossiianami,” Baltiiskii Federal’nii Universitet, October 2, 2015 at https://www.kantiana.ru/news/151/161935/ (last accessed May 21, 2018).

46. Anton Koval΄skii, Kazhdyi den΄ v Kaliningrade umirayet chastichka Kënigsberga, December 23, 2015 at http://imperative.eu/kaliningrad/kazhdy_den_v_kaliningrade_umiraet_chastichka_kenigsberga (last accessed May 21, 2018).

47. “Za 70 let prebyvaniia v sostave Rossii nemetskii gorodok prevratilsia v pomoiku (fotoreportazh),” Bramavu, April 13, 2015, at http://bramaby.com/ls/blog/history/2389.html (last accessed May 21, 2018).

48. See Sakson, Od Kłajpedy do Olsztyna: Współcześni mieszkańcy byłych Prus Wschodnich. Kraj Kłajpedzki, Obwód Kaliningradzki, Warmia i Mazury (Poznan, 2011).

49. Memorial΄naia doska Agnes Migel΄, Prussia39.ru, at http://www.prussia39.ru/sight/index.php?sid=1520 (last accessed May 21, 2018).

50. “Memorial΄naia doska Koloskovu A.A.,” Prussia39.ru, at http://www.prussia39.ru/sight/index.php?sid=1521 (last accessed May 21, 2018).

51. “V Kaliningrade demontirovana doska podpisantu ‘Kliatvy vernosti΄ Gitleru,” Regnum Infomatsionnoe Agentstvo, December 21, 2015 at http://regnum.ru/news/polit/2041244.html (last accessed May 21, 2018).

52. “Alikhanov: Vosstonavlivat΄ Korolevskii zamok my ne budem,” Kgd.ru, March 18, 2017, at https://kgd.ru/news/society/item/62005-alihanov-vosstanavlivat-korolevskij-zamok-my-ne-budem (last accessed May 21, 2018).

53. Foreign diplomat, interview, Kaliningrad, November 2015.

54. No major political forces from Germany, Lithuania, or Poland took part in this debate. They were of the opinion that any territorial changes in Europe need to be made with respect to international law and should not be subject to political science-fiction. Additionally, they treated the question of the future status of Kaliningrad oblast as a very delicate one, as there were still Soviet/Russian troops stationed all across central Europe. The last Russian soldier left Poland only in September 1993 (Russian technical personnel stayed until 1994).

55. It is not a coincidence that people of such origin constituted more than 90% of the post-war population of Kaliningrad oblast. They were perceived as ethnically Russian. Even though the Soviet Union declared itself as a multinational, ethnically-diverse state, many of its politicians and intellectuals demonstrated a Great Russian approach that had its roots in tsarist Russia. According to this view, Belarussians and Ukrainians were not considered as separate nations, but just a branch of the Great Russian nation. This phenomenon was described by Mykola Riabchuk, for example, in the online article Postkolonial΄nii Sindrom (Postcolonial Syndrome), available at https://day.kyiv.ua/uk/article/podrobici/postkolonialniy-sindrom (last accessed November 9, 2018).

56. Rasporiazhenie Prezidenta Rossiiskoi Federatsii ot 1 avgusta 2016 goda no 229-rp, at http://kremlin.ru/acts/bank/41173 (last accessed September 20, 2018).